Laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for transperitoneal pyeloplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Urology Annals

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 289-296

  Brandao, Luis Felipe ^a   Laydner, Humberto ^b   Zargar, Homayoun ^c   Torricelli, Fabio ^a   Andreoni, Cassio ^a   Kaouk, Jihad ^c   Autorino, Riccardo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparison; laparoendoscopic single site surgery; laparoscopy; meta analysis; pyeloplasty

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; MORPHINE;

AGE; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PYELOPLASTY; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETRACTOR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 84938542387     PISSN: 09747796     EISSN: 09747834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.156145     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Eden CG. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A critical analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;52:983-9.
2. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-9.
3. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1891-4.
4. Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology 2002;60:509-13.
5. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW, Yinghao S, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: Worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 2011;60:998-1005.
6. Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, Gettman M, Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: A critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2011;59:26-45.
7. Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, Pascal-Haber G, Desai MR, Mishra S, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: First clinical report. BJU Int 2008;101:83-8.
8. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Stein RJ. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: Initial report. BJU Int 2009;103:366-9.
9. Tugcu V, Sönmezay E, Ilbey YO, Polat H, Tasci AI. Transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: Initial experiences. J Endourol 2010;24:2023-7.
10. Best SL, Donnally C, Mir SA, Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA. Complications during the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2011;108:1326-9.
11. Chen Z, Chen X, Wu ZH, Luo YC, He Y, Li NN, et al. Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site dismembered pyeloplasty: A clinical report of 10 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:685-90.
12. Cestari A, Buffi NM, Lista G, Lughezzani G, Larcher A, Lazzeri M, et al. Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform. Eur Urol 2012;62:175-9.
13. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 2009;74:1029-34.
14. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle Ottawa 1 Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-analyses. Available from: http://www. ohri. ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford. asp. [Last accessed on 2014 Mar 03].
15. Clark HD, Wells GA, Huët C, McAlister FA, Salmi LR, Fergusson D, et al. Assessing the quality of randomized trials: Reliability of the Jadad scale. Control Clin Trials 1999;20:448-52.
16. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, et al. Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation. Oxford Centre for Evidence?Based Medicine-Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Available from: http://www. cebm. net/index. aspx?o=1025. [Last accessed on 2014 Mar 03].
17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
18. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.
19. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-48.
20. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.
21. Ju SH, Lee DG, Lee JH, Baek MK, Jeong BC, Jeon SS, et al. Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Pyeloplasty Using Additional 2 mm Instruments: A Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Korean J Urol 2011;52:616-21.
22. Stein RJ, Berger AK, Brandina R, Patel NS, Canes D, Irwin BH, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique. BJU Int 2011;107:811-5.
23. Naitoh Y, Kawauchi A, Yamada Y, Fujihara A, Hongo F, Kamoi K, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A matched pair analysis. Int J Urol 2014;21:793-6.
24. Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Sonmezay E, Aras B, Tasci AI. Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A prospective randomized study. Int J Urol 2013;20:1112-7.
25. Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, Guazzoni G, Buffi N, Peters CA, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2014;65:430-52.
26. Wu Y, Dong Q, Han P, Liu L, Wang L, Wei Q. Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22:658-62.
27. Rais-Bahrami S, Moreira DM, Hillelsohn JH, George AK, Rane A, Gross AJ, et al. Contemporary perspectives on laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urologic training and practice. J Endourol 2013;27:727-31.
28. Rais-Bahrami S, Rizkala ER, Cadeddu JA, Tugcu V, Derweesh IH, Abdel-Karim AM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: Outcomes of an international multi-institutional study of 140 patients. Urology 2013;82:366-72.
29. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, Fugita O, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002;167:1253-6.
30. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Yakoubi R, Rha KH, Stein RJ, White WM, et al. Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: Multi-institutional analysis of risk factors for conversion and postoperative complications. J Urol 2012;187:1989-94.
31. Harrow BR, Bagrodia A, Olweny EO, Faddegon S, Cadeddu JA, Gahan JC. Renal function after laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty. J Urol 2013;190:565-9.
32. Khanna R, Isac W, Laydner H, Autorino R, White MA, Hillyer S, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site reconstructive procedures in urology: Medium term results. J Urol 2012;187:1702-6.
33. Autorino R, Kaouk JH, Stolzenburg JU, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Tewari A, et al. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: A systematic review. Eur Urol 2013;63:266-80.
34. Olweny EO, Park SK, Tan YK, Gurbuz C, Cadeddu JA, Best SL. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty. Eur Urol 2012;61:410-4.