Renal function after laparoendoscopic single site pyeloplasty

Journal of Urology

Volumn 190, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 565-569

  Harrow, Brian R ^a   Bagrodia, Aditya ^a   Olweny, Ephrem O ^a   Faddegon, Stephen ^a   Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ^a   Gahan, Jeffrey C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

kidney; laparoscopy; robotics; treatment outcome; ureteral obstruction

Indexed keywords

DIURETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER REMOVAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE CYSTOSCOPE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATURIA; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELONEPHRITIS; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TROCAR; URETER OBSTRUCTION; URETERAL PELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; UROLITHIASIS;

C-LESS; CLP; CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; CONVENTIONAL LESS; DIURETIC RENOGRAM; DRG; EGFR; ESTIMATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HALF-TIME; KIDNEY; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE; LAPAROSCOPY; LESS; R-LESS; ROBOTIC LESS; ROBOTICS; T1/2; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPJO; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; URETERAL PELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FUNCTION TESTS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 84880038898     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.102     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. P.H. O'Reilly, P.J. Brooman, S. Mak The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty BJU Int 87 2001 287
2. R.C. Calvert, M.M. Morsy, B. Zelhof Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction Surg Endosc 22 2008 411
3. M.M. Desai, A.K. Berger, R. Brandina Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients Urology 74 2009 805
4. R.N. Chen, R.G. Moore, L.R. Kavoussi Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome Urol Clin North Am 25 1998 323
5. T.W. Jarrett, D.Y. Chan, T.C. Charambura Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases J Urol 167 2002 1253
6. C.R. Tracy, J.D. Raman, A. Bagrodia Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty Urology 74 2009 1029
7. E.O. Olweny, S.A. Mir, S.L. Best Importance of cosmesis to patients undergoing renal surgery: a comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS), laparoscopic and open surgery BJU Int 110 2012 268
8. S.L. Best, C. Donnally, S.A. Mir Complications during the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty BJU Int 108 2011 1326
9. R. Khanna, W. Isac, H. Laydner Laparoendoscopic single site reconstructive procedures in urology: medium term results J Urol 187 2012 1702
10. R.J. Stein, A.K. Berger, R. Brandina Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique BJU Int 107 2011 811
11. V. Tugcu, E. Sonmezay, Y.O. Ilbey Transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: initial experiences J Endourol 24 2010 2023
12. S.H. Ju, D.G. Lee, J.H. Lee Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty using additional 2 mm instruments: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty Korean J Urol 52 2011 616
13. E.O. Olweny, S.K. Park, Y.K. Tan Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty Eur Urol 61 2012 410
14. C.A. Seideman, Y.K. Tan, S. Faddegon Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: technique using the da Vinci Si robotic platform J Endourol 26 2012 971
15. S.M. Lucas, C.P. Sundaram, J.S. Wolf Jr Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group J Urol 187 2012 522
16. M.C. Ost, J.D. Kaye, M.J. Guttman Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction Urology 66 2005 47
17. J.M. Albani, M.M. Desai, I.S. Gill Repair of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the solitary kidney: effect on renal function Urology 68 2006 718
18. A.K. Wu, T.C. Tran, M.D. Sorensen Relative renal function does not improve after relieving chronic renal obstruction BJU Int 109 2012 1540
19. M.T. Gettman, R. Peschel, R. Neururer A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results Eur Urol 42 2002 453
20. R.E. Link, S.B. Bhayani, L.R. Kavoussi A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty Ann Surg 243 2006 486
21. A. Cestari, N.M. Buffi, G. Lista Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform Eur Urol 62 2012 175