Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 658-662

  Wu, Yunjian ^a   Dong, Qiang ^a   Han, Ping ^a   Liu, Liangren ^a   Wang, Li ^a   Wei, Qiang ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DATA ANALYSIS; EMBASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; PERITONEUM; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 84866998048     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2011.0508     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150:1795-1799 (Pubitemid 24350801)
2. Shoma AM, El Nahas AR, Bazeed MA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 2007;178:2020-2024 (Pubitemid 47538604)
3. Hafron J, Kaouk JH. Technical advances in urological laparoscopic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008;5: 145-151
4. Willis NS, Mitchell R, Craig JC. Renal group. In: Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2003
5. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 1996;47:311-316 (Pubitemid 26089506)
6. Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX Jr. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2005;48:973-977 (Pubitemid 41641648)
7. Abuanz S, Game X, Roche JB, Guillotreau J, Mouzin M, Sallusto F, Chaabane W, Malavaud B, Rischmann P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Comparison between retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal approach. Urology 2010; 76:877-881
8. Hemal AK, Goel R, Goel A. Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Single center experience. Int J Urol 2003;10: 563-568 (Pubitemid 37506129)
9. Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ. Which is better-retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?. J Urol 2007;178:1791-1795 (Pubitemid 47368519)
10. Qadri SJF, Khan M. Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Our experience. Urol Int 2010;85: 309-313
11. Juliano RV, Mendoca RR, Meyer F, Rubinstein M, Lasmar MTC, Korkes F, Tavares A, Pompeo ACL, Tobias-Machado M. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011;21:399-403
12. Chow K, Adeyoju AAB. National practice and outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the United Kingdom. J Endourol 2011;25:657-662
13. Jiang JH, Yan ZJ, Xie GH, Su XJ, Fang HW, Yang BB, Shen ZJ. The selection of different routes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Mod Practice Med 2010;22:928-929
14. Mei H, Pu JR, Yang CL, Zhang HY, Zheng LD, Tong QS. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2011;25:727-736
15. Braga LH, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol 2009;56:848-857.