Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Pyeloplasty Using Additional 2 mm Instruments: A comparison with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty

Korean Journal of Urology

Volumn 52, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 616-621

  Ju, Sung Ho ^a   Lee, Dong Gi ^a   Lee, Jun Ho ^a   Baek, Min Ki ^a   Jeong, Byong Chang ^a   Jeon, Seong Soo ^a   Lee, Kyu Sung ^a   Han, Deok Hyun ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive; Surgical procedure; Ureteral obstruction

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PYELOPLASTY; URETER STENT;

EID: 84930475798     PISSN: 20056737     EISSN: 20056745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.9.616     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Chamie K, Tanaka ST, Hu B, Kurzrock EA. Short stay pyeloplasty: variables affecting pain and length of stay. J Urol 2008;179:1549-52.
2. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993;150:1795-9.
3. Winfield HN. Management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction--is it time for a new gold standard? J Urol 2006; 176:866-7.
4. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 2009;55:1198-204.
5. Raybourn JH 3rd, Rane A, Sundaram CP. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for nephrectomy as a feasible alternative to traditional laparoscopy. Urology 2010;75:100-3.
6. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 2010;57:95-101.
7. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 2009;74: 1029-34.
8. White WM, Goel RK, Kaouk JH. Single-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery: initial operative experience and comparative outcomes. Urology 2009;73:1279-82.
9. Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, Pascal-Haber G, Desai MR, Mishra S, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 2008;101:83-8.
10. Stein RJ, Berger AK, Brandina R, Patel NS, Canes D, Irwin BH, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique. BJU Int 2011;107: 811-5.
11. Kim TH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Han DH. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy for large impacted ureteral stones: initial experiences. Korean J Urol 2010;51:403-8.
12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
13. Calvert RC, Morsy MM, Zelhof B, Rhodes M, Burgess NA. Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Surg Endosc 2008;22: 411-4.
14. Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 2008;26:539-47.
15. Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006;67:932-6.