Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A prospective randomized study

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1112-1117

  Tugcu, Volkan ^a   Ilbey, Yusuf Ozlem ^a   Sonmezay, Erkan ^a   Aras, Bekir ^a   Tasci, Ali Ihsan ^a  

^a BAKIRKOY DR SADI KONUK TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Laparascopy; Pyeloplasty; Single port; Single site surgery

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; PETHIDINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE PYELOPLASTY; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

LAPARASCOPY; PYELOPLASTY; SINGLE PORT; SINGLE-SITE SURGERY;

ADULT; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UROLOGIC DISEASES; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84886803905     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/iju.12126     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chamie K, Tanaka ST, Hu B etal. Short stay pyeloplasty: variables affecting pain and length of stay. J. Urol. 2008; 179: 1549-1552.
2. Schuessler WW, Grune M, Tecuanhuey LV etal. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J. Urol. 1993; 150: 1795-1799.
3. Winfield HN. Management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Is it time for a new gold standard? J. Urol. 2006; 176: 866-867.
4. Rané A, Rao P, Rao P. Single port laparoscopic nephrectomy using a novel laparoscopic port (R-Port). Urology 2008; 72: 260-263.
5. Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M etal. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 637-641.
6. Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M etal. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int. 2008; 101: 83-88.
7. Rane A, Rao P, Rao P. Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology 2008; 72: 260-264.
8. Tugcu V, Sönmezay E, Ilbey YO etal. Transperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: initial experiences. J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 2023-2027.
9. Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Polat H etal. Early experience with laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty in children. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2011; 7: 187-191.
10. Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Mutlu B etal. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study. J. Endourol. 2010; 24: 1315-1320.
11. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A etal. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 2009; 74: 1029-1034.
12. Stein RJ, Berger AK, Brandina R etal. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: a comparison with the standard laparoscopic technique. BJU Int. 2011; 107: 811-815.
13. Park SK, Olwenly EO, Best SL etal. Patient-reported body image and cosmetic outcomes following kidney surgery: comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, laparoscopic, and open surgery. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 1097-1104.
14. Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br. J. Urol 1949; 21: 209-214.
15. Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG etal. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Eur. UroL 2005; 48: 973-977.
16. Ju SH, Lee DG, Lee JH etal. Laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty using additional 2mm instruments: a comparison with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Korean J. Urol. 2011; 52: 616-621.
17. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Cadeddu JA etal. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: where have we been and where are we heading? Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 2008; 5: 561-568.
18. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M etal. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 95-101.
19. White WM, Goel RK, Kaouk JH. Single port laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery: initial operative experience and comparative outcomes. Urology 2009; 73: 1279-1282.
20. Raybourn JH III, Rane A, Sundaram CP. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for nephrectomy as a feasible alternative to traditional laparoscopy. Urology 2010; 75: 100-103.
21. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur. Urol. 2009; 55: 1198-1204.
22. Faddegon S, Tan YK, Olweny EO, Park SK, Best SL, Cadeddu JA. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty for horseshoe ureteropelvic junction obstruction. JSLS 2012; 16: 151-154.
23. Ganpule AP, Sharma R, Kurien A etal. Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in urology: a single centre experience. J. Minim Access Surg. 2012; 8: 79-84.