Reliability of measurements made on scanned cast models using the 3Shape R700 scanner

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Lemos, Larissa Santos ^a   Rebello, I M C R ^a   Vogel, C J ^a   Barbosa, M C ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental models; Orthodontics; Three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING PHANTOM; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84938520022     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: 1476542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140337     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Matsui RH, Ortolani CLF, Castilho JCM, Costa C. Analysis for orthodontics models through digitalized methods. [In Portuguese.] Rev Inst Ciênc Health 2007; 25: 285-90.
2. Hou HM, Wong RWK, Hägg EUO. The uses of orthodontic study models in diagnosis and treatment planning. Hong Kong Dent J 2006; 3: 107-15.
3. Oliveira DD, Ruellas ACO, Drummond MEL, Pantuzo MCG, Lanna AMQ. Reliability of three-dimensional digital casts as a diagnostic tool for orthodontic treatment planning: a pilot study. [In Portuguese.] Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial 2007; 12: 84-93.
4. de Almeida AM, Lauris RCMC, Peixoto AP, Gribel BF, Janson G, Garib DG. Digital models in orthodontics. [In Portuguese.] Pro-dental Orto 2011; 4: 55-80.
5. Gallão S. From gypsum models to tridimensional images. [In Portugese.] Araraquara: Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2010.
6. Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 263-74.
7. Paredes V, Gandia JL, Cibrián R. Digital diagnosis records in orthodontics. An overview. [In Spanish.] Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: 88-93.
8. Marcel TJ. Three-dimensional on-screen virtual models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 666-8.
9. Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's index. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 435-9. doi: 10.2319/083109-491.1
10. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
11. Lightheart KG, English JD, Kau CH, Akyalcin S, Bussa HI Jr, McGrory KR, et al. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.019
12. Kuo E, Miller RJ. Automated custom-manufacturing technology in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 578-81.
13. Joffe L. Current products and practices OrthoCAD™: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod 2004; 31: 344-7.
14. Mayers M, Firestone AR, Rashid R, Vig KW. Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 431-4.
15. Alcan T, Ceylanoʇlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 30-6. doi: 10.2319/100307-475.1
16. Sousa MV, Vasconcelos EC, Janson G, Garib D, Pinzan A. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.028
17. Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 140-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018
18. Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255-68.
19. McBride GB. A proposal for strength of agreement criteria for Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Hamilton, New Zealand: NIWA Client Report; 2005.
20. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 288-95.
21. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 382-90.
22. Grehs B. Analyses and comparison of linear measurements performed on plaster models and three-dimensional images. [In Portugese.] Araraquara: Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2009.
23. Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 2002; 3: 250-4.
24. Blos JML, Vargas IA, Closs LQ. Evaluation of computer-aided space analysis compared to conventional method. [In Portuguese.] Stomata 2005; 11: 13-19.
25. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 301-6.
26. Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U, Wong RW, Bendeus M, et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 589-95. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp159
27. Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM, Fischer JR Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 351-7.
28. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 298-303.
29. Rheude B, Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 300-4.
30. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 346-52.
31. Correia GD, Habib FA, Vogel CJ. Tooth-size discrepancy: a comparison between manual and digital methods. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 107-13.