Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 143, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 140-147

  Wiranto, Matthew G ^a   Engelbrecht, W Petrie ^a   Tutein Nolthenius, Heleen E ^a   Van Der Meer, W Joerd ^a   Ren, Yijin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGINIC ACID;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FACE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGINATES; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; FACE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; ODONTOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84871865056     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. P.S. Fleming, V. Marinho, and A. Johal Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review Orthod Craniofac Res 14 2011 1 16
2. A. Macchi, G. Carrafiello, V. Cacciafesta, and A. Norcini Three-dimensional digital modeling and setup Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 605 610
3. F.A. Rangel, T.J.J. Maal, S.J. Bergé, O.J.C. van Vlijmen, J.M. Plooij, and F. Schutyser Integration of digital dental casts in 3-dimensional facial photographs Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134 2008 820 826
4. A.P. Keating, J. Knox, R. Bibb, and A.I. Zhurov A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy J Orthod 35 2008 191 201
5. C.H. Kau, J. Littlefield, N. Rainy, J.T. Nguyen, and B. Creed Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's index Angle Orthod 80 2010 435 439
6. M. Santoro, S. Galkin, M. Teredesai, O.F. Nicolay, and T.J. Cangialosi Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 2003 101 105
7. M.L. Quimby, K.W. Vig, R.G. Rashid, and A.R. Firestone The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models Angle Orthod 74 2004 298 303
8. J.J. Tomassetti, L.J. Taloumis, J.M. Denny, and J.R. Fischer Jr. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method Angle Orthod 71 2001 351 357
9. M.F. Leifert, M.M. Leifert, S.S. Efstratiadis, and T.J. Cangialosi Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136 2009 16.e1 16.e4
10. S.R. Mullen, C.A. Martin, P. Ngan, and M. Gladwin Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 2007 346 352
11. O. Zilberman, J.Å.V. Huggare, and K.A. Parikakis Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models Angle Orthod 73 2003 301 306
12. D.R. Stevens, C. Flores-Mir, B. Nebbe, D.W. Raboud, G. Heo, and P.W. Major Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 794 803
13. P.A. Costalos, K. Sarraf, T.J. Cangialosi, and S. Efstratiadis Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 2005 624 629
14. M. Mayers, A.R. Firestone, R. Rashid, and K.W.L. Vig Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 2005 431 434
15. T.R. Okunami, B. Kusnoto, E. Begole, C.A. Evans, C. Sadowsky, and S. Fadavi Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 2007 51 56
16. J.L. Whetten, P.C. Williamson, G. Heo, C. Varnhagen, and P.W. Major Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 2006 485 491
17. A.J. White, D.W. Fallis, and K.S. Vandewalle Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137 2010 456.e1 456.e9
18. A.C. Veenema, C. Katsaros, S.C. Boxum, E.M. Bronkhorst, and A.M. Kuijpers-Jagtman Index of complexity, outcome and need scored on plaster and digital models Eur J Orthod 31 2009 281 286
19. G. Torassian, C.H. Kau, J.D. English, J. Powers, H.I. Bussa, and A.M. Salas-Lopez Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials Angle Orthod 80 2010 474 481
20. D. Naidu, J. Scott, D. Ong, and C.T. Ho Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses Aust Orthod J 25 2009 97 103
21. M. Sedda, A. Casarotto, A. Raustia, and A. Borracchini Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids J Contemp Dent Pract 9 2008 59 66
22. Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. Available at: http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3M/en-US/LavaCOS/3MESPE-LavaCOS/HowItWorks/. Accessed March 15, 2012.
23. B. Stegenga, and J.J.R. Huddleston Slater Klinische epidemiologie en biostatistiek 2008 RuG Groningen
24. W.C. Shellhart, D.W. Lange, G.T. Kluemper, E.P. Hicks, and A.L. Kaplan Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions Angle Orthod 65 1995 327 334
25. R.M. Coleman, J.H. Hembree Jr., and F.N. Weber Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material Am J Orthod 75 1979 438 446
26. W.R. Proffit Contemporary orthodontics 3rd ed. 2000 Mosby St Louis