Bacteria and osteoblast adhesion to chitosan immobilized titanium surface: A race for the surface

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Volumn 134, Issue , 2015, Pages 370-376

  Foss, Berit L ^a   Ghimire, Niranjan ^a   Tang, Ruogu ^b   Sun, Yuyu ^b   Deng, Ying ^a  

^a University of South Dakota   (United States)

^b University of Massachusetts Lowell   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti infective; Chitosan immobilized titanium; Co culture; Implant; Osteoblast

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BACTERIA; CHITIN; CHITOSAN; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MULTILAYERS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TITANIUM;

ANTI-INFECTIVE; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CO-CULTURES; IMPLANT-ASSOCIATED INFECTION; OSTEOBLAST ADHESION; QUANTIFICATION ANALYSIS; QUANTIFICATION ASSAYS; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

OSTEOBLASTS;

CHITOSAN; SULFURIC ACID; TITANIUM; BIOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; CELL ADHESION; CELL SPREADING; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DEVICE INFECTION; IMMOBILIZATION; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; COCULTURE; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CHITOSAN; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84938071201     PISSN: 09277765     EISSN: 18734367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rupp F., Scheideler L., Olshanska N., de Wild M., Wieland M., Geis-Gerstorfer J. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 76:323-334.
2. Le Guehennec L., Lopez-Heredia M.A., Enkel B., Weiss P., Amouriq Y., Layrolle P. Osteoblastic cell behaviour on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4:535-543.
3. Gahlert M., Gudehus T., Eichhorn S., Steinhauser E., Kniha H., Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2007, 18:662-668.
4. Gittens R.A., McLachlan T., Olivares-Navarrete R., Cai Y., Berner S., Tannenbaum R., Schwartz Z., Sandhage K.H., Boyan B.D. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3395-3403.
5. Wu Y., Zitelli J.P., TenHuisen K.S., Yu X., Libera M.R. Differential response of Staphylococci and osteoblasts to varying titanium surface roughness. Biomaterials 2011, 32:951-960.
6. Le Guehennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23:844-854.
7. Cooper L.F., Masuda T., Yliheikkila P.K., Felton D.A. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 1998, 13:163-174.
8. Li Y., Lee I.S., Cui F.Z., Choi S.H. The biocompatibility of nanostructured calcium phosphate coated on micro-arc oxidized titanium. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2025-2032.
9. Rosa M.B., Albrektsson T., Francischone C.E., Schwartz Filho H.O., Wennerberg A. The influence of surface treatment on the implant roughness pattern. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2012, 20:550-555. revista FOB.
10. Burgers R., Gerlach T., Hahnel S., Schwarz F., Handel G., Gosau M. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2010, 21:156-164.
11. Molin S., Tolker-Nielsen T. Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14:255-261.
12. WHO, Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance, Geneva World Health Organization (2014) 20142014.
13. Shi Z., Neoh K.G., Kang E.T., Poh C., Wang W. Bacterial adhesion and osteoblast function on titanium with surface-grafted chitosan and immobilized RGD peptide. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2008, 86:865-872.
14. Amoroso P.F., Adams R.J., Waters M.G., Williams D.W. Titanium surface modification and its effect on the adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis: an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2006, 17:633-637.
15. Zhao L., Chu P.K., Zhang Y., Wu Z. Antibacterial coatings on titanium implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 91:470-480.
16. Yuan Y., Chesnutt B.M., Wright L., Haggard W.O., Bumgardner J.D. Mechanical property, degradation rate, and bone cell growth of chitosan coated titanium influenced by degree of deacetylation of chitosan. J Biomed Mater Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008, 86:245-252.
17. Quirynen M., van der Mei H.C., Bollen C.M., Schotte A., Marechal M., Doornbusch G.I., Naert I., Busscher H.J., van Steenberghe D. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque. J. Dent. Res. 1993, 72:1304-1309.
18. Ghimire N., Luo J., Tang R., Sun Y., Deng Y. Novel anti-infective activities of chitosan immobilized titanium surface with enhanced osteogenic properties. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2014, 122:126-133.
19. Gristina A.G., Naylor P., Myrvik Q. Infections from biomaterials and implants: a race for the surface. Med. Prog. Technol. 1988, 14:205-224.
20. Liu C., Bayer A., Cosgrove S.E., Daum R.S., Fridkin S.K., Gorwitz R.J., Kaplan S.L., Karchmer A.W., Levine D.P., Murray B.E., Rybak M.J., Talan D.A., Chambers H.F. A infectious diseases society of, clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52:e18-e55.
21. Cramton S.E., Gerke C., Schnell N.F., Nichols W.W., Gotz F. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67:5427-5433.
22. Agley C.C., Velloso C.P., Lazarus N.R., Harridge S.D. An image analysis method for the precise selection and quantitation of fluorescently labeled cellular constituents: application to the measurement of human muscle cells in culture. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60:428-438.
23. Burns T.C., Stinner D.J., Mack A.W., Potter B.K., Beer R., Eckel T.T., Possley D.R., Beltran M.J., Hayda R.A., Andersen R.C., Keeling J.J., Frisch H.M., Murray C.K., Wenke J.C., Ficke J.R., Hsu J.R. Skeletal trauma research, microbiology and injury characteristics in severe open tibia fractures from combat. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012, 72:1062-1067.
24. Arens S., Schlegel U., Printzen G., Ziegler W.J., Perren S.M., Hansis M. Influence of materials for fixation implants on local infection. An experimental study of steel versus titanium DCP in rabbits. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1996, 78:647-651.
25. Wenke J.C., Guelcher S.A. Dual delivery of an antibiotic and a growth factor addresses both the microbiological and biological challenges of contaminated bone fractures. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2011, 8:1555-1569.
26. Neoh K.G., Hu X., Zheng D., Kang E.T. Balancing osteoblast functions and bacterial adhesion on functionalized titanium surfaces. Biomaterials 2012, 33:2813-2822.
27. Rabea E.I., Badawy M.E., Stevens C.V., Smagghe G., Steurbaut W. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4:1457-1465.
28. Kong M., Chen X.G., Xing K., Park H.J. Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: a state of the art review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 144:51-63.
29. Masuda H., Iwasaki H., Kawamoto A., Akimaru H., Ishikawa M., Ii M., Shizuno T., Sato A., Ito R., Horii M., Ishida H., Kato S., Asahara T. Development of serum-free quality and quantity control culture of colony-forming endothelial progenitor cell for vasculogenesis. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2012, 1:160-171.