Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonists differentially reduce the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 151, Issue , 2015, Pages 213-220

  Kraft, Tamar T ^a   Yakubov, Yakov ^b   Huang, Donald ^b   Fitzgerald, Gregory ^b   Natanova, Elona ^b   Sclafani, Anthony ^a,c   Bodnar, Richard J ^a,b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic variance; Naltrexone; Orosensory (flavor flavor) learning; SCH23390

Indexed keywords

8 CHLORO 2,3,4,5 TETRAHYDRO 3 METHYL 5 PHENYL 1H 3 BENZAZEPIN 7 OL HYDROGEN MALEATE; FRUCTOSE; NALTREXONE; SACCHARIN; SUCROSE; BENZAZEPINE DERIVATIVE; DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DRD1A PROTEIN, MOUSE; NARCOTIC ANTAGONIST;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; CHERRY; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLAVOR; GRAPE; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; SUGAR INTAKE; SWEETNESS; SWISS WEBSTER MOUSE; TASTE PREFERENCE; TRAINING; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRUG EFFECTS; FOOD DEPRIVATION; FOOD PREFERENCE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BENZAZEPINES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FOOD DEPRIVATION; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUCTOSE; MALE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; NALTREXONE; NARCOTIC ANTAGONISTS; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D1; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84938058357     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.028     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ackroff K., Touzani K., Peets T.K., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 72:691-703.
2. Azzara A.V., Bodnar R.J., Delamater A.R., Sclafani A. Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2000, 67:545-557.
3. Azzara A.V., Bodnar R.J., Delamater A.R., Sclafani A. D-1 but not D-2 dopamine receptor antagonism blocks the acquisition of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2001, 68:709-720.
4. Baker R.M., Li Y., Lee M., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Naltrexone does not prevent acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by fructose in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2004, 78:239-246.
5. Baker R.M., Shah M.J., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists reduce the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by fructose in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2003, 75:55-65.
6. Dym C.T., Kraft T.T., Bae V.S., Yakubov Y., Touzani K., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Double dissociation of D1 and opioid receptor antagonism effects on the acquisition of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012, 103:26-32.
7. Dym C.T., Pinhas A., Ginzberg M., Kest B., Bodnar R.J. Genetic variance contributes to naltrexone-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res. 2007, 1135:136-145.
8. Dym C.T., Pinhas A., Robak M., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Genetic variance contributes to dopamine D1 and D2 antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains. Brain Res. 2009, 1257:40-52.
9. Geary N., Smith G.P. Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1985, 22:787-790.
10. Glass M.J., Grace M., Cleary J.P., Billington C.J., Levine A.S. Potency of naloxone's anorectic effect in rats is dependent on diet preference. Am. J. Physiol. 1996, 271:R217-R221.
11. Huang D., Kraft T.T., Lolier L., Natanova E., LaMagna S., Warshaw D., Vaknin O., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice display differential preferences for nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 2014, 40.
12. Kirkham T.C., Cooper S.J. Naloxone attenuation of sham feeding is modified by manipulation of sucrose concentration. Physiol. Behav. 1988, 44:491-494.
13. Kraft T.T., Huang D., Natanova E., Lolier M., Yakubov Y., La Magna S., Warshaw D., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonist-induced reductions of fructose and saccharin intake in BALB/c and SWR inbred mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2015, 131:13-18.
14. Levine A.S., Murray S.S., Kneip J., Grace M., Morley J.E. Flavor enhances the antidipsogenic effect of naloxone. Physiol. Behav. 1982, 28:23-25.
15. Levine A.S., Weldon D.T., Grace M., Cleary J.P., Billington C.J. Naloxone blocks that portion of feeding driven by sweet taste in food-restricted rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1995, 268:R248-R252.
16. Mehiel R., Bolles R.C. Learned flavor preferences based on calories are independent of initial hedonic value. Anim. Learn. Behav. 1988, 16:383-387.
17. Muscat R., Willner P. Effects of selective dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference. Psychopharmacology 1989, 99:98-102.
18. Pinhas A., Aviel M., Koen M., Gurgov S., Acosta V., Israel M., Kakuriev L., Guskova E., Fuzailov I., Touzani K., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 105:451-459.
19. Reed D.R., Li S., Li X., Huang L., Tordoff M.G., Starling-Roney R., Taniguchi K., West D.B., Ohmen J.D., Beauchamp G.K., Bachmanov A.A. Polymorphisms in the taste receptor gene (Tas1r3) region are associated with saccharin preference in 30 mouse strains. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:938-946.
20. Rockwood G.A., Reid L.D. Naloxone modifies sugar-water intake in rats drinking with open gastric fistulas. Physiol. Behav. 1982, 29:1175-1178.
21. Schneider L.H., Gibbs J., Smith G.P. D-2 selective receptor antagonists suppress sucrose sham feeding in the rat. Brain Res. Bull. 1986, 17:605-611.
22. Sclafani A. How food preferences are learned - laboratory animal models. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1995, 54:419-427.
23. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 106:457-461.
24. Sclafani A., Aravich P.F., Xenakis S. Dopaminergic and endorphinergic mediation of a sweet reward. The Neural Basis of Feeding and Reward 1982, 507-515. Haer Institute, Brunswick, ME. B.G. Hoebel, D. Novin (Eds.).
25. Sclafani A., Cardieri C., Tucker K., Blusk D., Ackroff K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 1993, 265:R320-R325.
26. Sclafani A., Fanizza L.J., Azzara A.V. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose and fructose in rats. Physiol. Behav. 1999, 67:227-234.
27. Sclafani A., Glendinning J.I. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 289:R712-R720.
28. Sclafani A., Zukerman S., Ackroff K. Fructose and glucose conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar reward. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014, 307:R1448-R1457.
29. Yu W.-Z., Sclafani A., Delamater A.R., Bodnar R.J. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1999, 64:573-584.
30. Yu W.-Z., Silva R.M., Sclafani A., Delamater A.R., Bodnar R.J. Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of dopamine receptor antagonists. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2000, 65:635-647.
31. 2 dopamine receptors in the acquisition and expression of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2000, 67:537-544.
32. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 109:33-41.
33. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and non-metabolizable sugar analogs. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2013, 305:R840-R853.