Dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists reduce the acquisition and expression of flavor-preferences conditioned by fructose in rats

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 55-65

  Baker, Robert M ^a   Shah, Mamta J ^a   Sclafani, Anthony ^b   Bodnar, Richard J ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Flavor flavor learning; Raclopride; Saccharin; SCH23390; Sweet taste

Indexed keywords

8 CHLORO 2,3,4,5 TETRAHYDRO 3 METHYL 5 PHENYL 1H 3 BENZAZEPIN 7 OL HYDROGEN MALEATE; DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DRUG VEHICLE; FRUCTOSE; RACLOPRIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG MECHANISM; FLAVOR; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SWEETNESS; TASTE PREFERENCE; TRAINING;

EID: 0037959741     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00039-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Azzara A.V., Bodnar R.J., Delamater A.R., Sclafani A. Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor-preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 67:2000;545-557.
2. Azzara A.V., Bodnar R.J., Delamater A.R., Sclafani A. D-1 but not D-2 dopamine receptor antagonism blocks the acquisition of a flavor-preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 68:2001;709-720.
3. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev. 28:1998;309-369.
4. Breslin P.A.S., Davidson T.L., Grill H.J. Conditioned reversal of reactions to normally avoided tastes. Physiol. Behav. 47:1990;535-538.
5. Capaldi E.D. Why we eat what we eat. 1996;American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
6. 1 dopaminergic mechanisms in conditioned taste aversion. Brain Res. 729:1996;234-245.
7. Coons E.E., White H.A. Tonic properties of orosensation and the modulation of intracranial self-stimulation: the CNS weighting of external and internal factors governing reward. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 290:1977;158-179.
8. Ettenberg A., White N. Pimozide attenuates conditioned taste preferences induced by self-stimulation in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15:1981;915-919.
9. 1 receptors of the nucleus accumbens shell in conditioned taste aversion learning. J. Neurosci. 21:2001;6897-6904.
10. Geary N., Smith G.P. Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 22:1985;787-790.
11. Holman E.W. Immediate and delayed reinforcers for flavor-preferences in the rat. Learn. Motiv. 6:1975;91-100.
12. Hsiao S., Smith G.P. Raclopride reduces sucrose preference in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 50:1995;121-125.
13. Ikemoto S., Panksepp J. The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res. Rev. 31:1999;6-41.
14. Muscat R., Willner P. Effects of selective dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference. Psychopharmacology. 99:1989;98-102.
15. Ono T., Sasaki K., Nakamura K., Norgren R. Integrated lateral hypothalamic neural responses to natural and artificial rewards and cue signals in the rat. Brain Res. 327:1985;303-306.
16. Salamone J.D., Cousins M.S., Snyder B.J. Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21:1997;341-359.
17. Schneider L.H. Orosensory self-stimulation by sucrose involves brain dopaminergic mechanisms. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 575:1989;307-319.
18. Sclafani A. Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity: an overview. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 11:1987;131-153.
19. Sclafani A. How food preferences are learned: laboratory animal models. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 54:1995;419-427.
20. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Glucose- and fructose-conditioned flavor-preferences in rats: taste versus post-ingestive conditioning. Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;399-405.
21. Sclafani A., Mann S. Carbohydrate taste preferences in rats: sucrose, maltose, fructose and polycose compared. Physiol. Behav. 40:1987;563-568.
22. Sclafani A., Cardieri C., Tucker K., Blusk D., Ackroff K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor-preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 265:1993;R320-R325.
23. Sclafani A., Nissenbaum J.W., Ackroff K. Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety. Physiol. Behav. 56:1994;331-337.
24. Sclafani A., Fanizza L.J., Azzara A.V. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose and fructose in rats. Physiol. Behav. 67:1999;227-234.
25. Smith G.P. Dopamine and food reward. Fluharty S., Morrison A.M., Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology. vol. 16:1995;83-144 Academic Press, New York.
26. Warwick Z.S., Weingarten H.P. Flavor-postingestive consequence associations incorporate the behaviorally opposing effects of positive reinforcement and anticipated satiety: implications for interpreting two-bottle tests. Physiol. Behav. 60:1996;711-715.
27. Weingarten H.P., Watson S.D. Sham feeding as a procedure for assessing the influence of diet palatability on food intake. Physiol. Behav. 28:1982;401-407.
28. Xenakis S., Sclafani A. The effects of pimozide on the consumption of a palatable saccharin-glucose solution in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15:1981;435-442.
29. Yu W.-Z., Sclafani A., Delamater A.R., Bodnar R.J. Pharmacology of flavor-preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 64:1999;573-584.
30. Yu W.-Z., Silva R.M., Sclafani A., Delamater A.R., Bodnar R.J. Pharmacology of flavor-preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of dopamine receptor antagonists. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 65:2000;635-647.
31. 2 dopamine receptors in the acquisition and expression of flavor-preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 67:2000;537-544.