Information for decision-making is ubiquitous: Revisiting the reverse engineering mode in breadmaking technology

Proceedings - International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science

Volumn 2015-June, Issue June, 2015, Pages 250-261

  Thomopoulos, Rallou ^a,b   Chadli, Ahmed ^a   Croitoru, Madalina ^b   Abecassis, Joel ^a   Brochoire, Gerard ^c   Chiron, Hubert ^d  

^a UMR IATE   (France)

^b LIRMM   (France)

^c INBP   (France)

^d INRA   (France)

Author keywords

Collaborative Analysis and Decision; Conceptual Modelling and Ontologies; Decision Information Systems; Food Science and Technology Application; Multi Source Information

Indexed keywords

BREADMAKING; REVERSE ENGINEERING;

COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; DECISION INFORMATION SYSTEM; FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; MULTI-SOURCE INFORMATIONS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84937937567     PISSN: 21511349     EISSN: 21511357     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RCIS.2015.7128886     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. R. Thomopoulos, B. Charnomordic, B. Cuq, and J. Abécassis, "Artificial intelligence-based decision support system to manage quality of durum wheat products," Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 179-190, September 2009
2. H. Brunelière, J. Cabot, G. Dupé, and F. Madiot, "Modisco: A model driven reverse engineering framework," Information and Software Technology, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1012-1032, 2014
3. N. Perrot, I. Trelea, C. Baudrit, G. Trystram, and P. Bourgine, "Modelling and analysis of complex food systems: State of the art and new trends," Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 304-314, 2011
4. D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade, Decision-making process-Concepts and Methods. Wiley, 2009
5. P. M. Dung, "On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games," Artificial Intelligence Journal, vol. 77, pp. 321-357, 1995
6. P. Besnard and A. Hunter, Elements of Argumentation. The MIT Press, 2008
7. I. Rahwan and G. Simari, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 2009
8. L. Amgoud and H. Prade, "Using arguments for making and explaining decisions," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 173, no. 3-4, pp. 413-436, 2009
9. T. J. Bench-Capon, "Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks," Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 429-448, 2003
10. J. Tremblay and I. Abi-Zeid, "Value-based argumentation for policy decision analysis: methodology and an exploratory case study of a hydroelectric project in quÃl'bec," Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1-21, 2015
11. Z. Assaghir, A. Napoli, M. Kaytoue, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, "Numerical information fusion: Lattice of answers with supporting arguments," in ICTAI, 2011, pp. 621-628
12. A. Calì, G. Gottlob, T. Lukasiewicz, B. Marnette, and A. Pieris, "Datalog+/-: A family of logical knowledge representation and query languages for new applications," in LICS, 2010, pp. 228-242
13. F. Baader, S. Brandt, and C. Lutz, "Pushing the el envelope," in Proc of IJCAI 2005, 2005
14. D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati, "Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The dl-lite family," J. Autom. Reasoning, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 385-429, 2007
15. M. Chein and M.-L. Mugnier, Graph-based Knowledge Representation and Reasoning-Computational Foundations of Conceptual Graphs, ser. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, 2009
16. M. Chein, M.-L. Mugnier, and M. Croitoru, "Visual reasoning with graph-based mechanisms: the good, the better and the best." The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 28, pp. 249-271, 2013
17. M. Croitoru and S. Vesic, "What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?" in Proc of SUM 2013 (to appear), 2013
18. A. J. García and G. R. Simari, "Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach," Theory and practice of logic programming, vol. 4, pp. 95-138, 2004
19. P. Besnard and A. Hunter, "Practical first-order argumentation," in Proc of AAAI, 2005, pp. 590-595
20. J. Muller and A. Hunter, "An argumentation-based approach for decision making," in Proc of ICTAI, 2012, pp. 564-571
21. J.-M. Bourre, A. Bégat, M.-C. Leroux, V. Mousques-Cami, N. Pérandel, and F. Souply, "Valeur nutritionnelle (macro et micro-nutriments) de farines et pains français," Médecine et Nutrition, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 49-76, 2008
22. J. Slavin and H. Green, "Diatery fibre and satiety," British Nutrition Foundation, vol. 32(1), pp. 32-42, 2007
23. S. Dubuisson-Quellier, "De la routine à la délibération. les arbitrages des consommateurs en situation d'achat," Réseaux, vol. 135/136, pp. 253-284, 2006
24. E. Ginon, Y. Lohérac, C. Martin, P. Combris, and S. Issanchou, "Effect of fibre information on consumer willingness to pay for french baguettes," Food Quality and Preference, vol. 20, pp. 343-352, 2009
25. T. Layat, "Place du pain dans l'équilibre alimentaire," Pratiques en nutrition, vol. 7, no. 26, pp. 45-50, 2011
26. PNNS (documents statutaires), http://www.sante.gouv.fr/htm/pointsur/nutrition/pol-nutri4.htm, 2010
27. M. Dean, R. Sheperd, A. Arvola, P. Lampila, L. Lahteenmaki, M. Vassalo, A. Saba, E. Claupein, and M. Winkelmann, "Report on consumer expectations of health benefits of modified cereal products," University of Surrey, UK, Tech. Rep., 2007
28. HEALTHGRAIN, http://www.healthgrain.org, 2009
29. DINABIO, "Proceedings of dinabio développement et innovation en agriculture biologique," http://www.inra.fr/ciag/revue-innovations- agronomiques/volume-4-janvier-2009, INRA, 2008
30. CADINNO, "Information, choix, consommateurs responsables des leviers pour un développement durable ?" http://www.melissa. ens-Cachan.fr/IMG/pdf/Colloque-CadInno-FR.pdf, 2008
31. AQUANUP, http://www.inra.fr/inra-cepia/vous-recherchez/des- projets/France/aquanup, 2009
32. FCN, "Fibres, céréales et nutrition," http://www.inra.fr/content/view/full/24670029, 2009
33. J.-F. Baget and E. Salvat, "Rules dependencies in backward chaining of conceptual graphs rules," in Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application, 14th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ser. LNCS, vol. 4068. Springer, 2006, pp. 102-116
34. M. Konig, M. Leclere, M.-L. Mugnier, and M. Thomazo, "A sound and complete backward chaining algorithm for existential rules," in Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, M. Krotzsch and U. Straccia, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012, vol. 7497, pp. 122-138
35. S. Klarman, U. Endriss, and S. Schlobach, "Abox abduction in the description logic alc," J. Autom. Reasoning, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 43-80, 2011
36. M. Caminada and L. Amgoud, "On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 171, no. 5, pp. 286-310, 2007
37. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol, "A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments," Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 197-216, 2002
38. T. J. M. Bench-Capon, "Persuasion in practical argument using valuebased argumentation frameworks," Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 429-448, 2003
39. S. Kaci and L. van der Torre, "Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values," International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 730-751, 2008
40. L. Amgoud, S. Parsons, and L. Perrussel, "An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal and Applied and Practical Reasoning, 2000, pp. 59-67
41. J.-R. Bourguet, R. Thomopoulos, M.-L. Mugnier, and J. Abécassis, "An artificial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality in a public health policy," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 4539-4546, September 2013