An artificial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality in a public health policy

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 4539-4546

  Bourguet, Jean Rémi ^a,b   Thomopoulos, Rallou ^a,b   Mugnier, Marie Laure ^b   Abécassis, Joël ^a  

^a UMR IATE   (France)

^b De Robotique et de Mi croélectronique de Montpellier   (France)

Author keywords

Arbitration; Argumentation; Artificial intelligence; Benefit risk analysis; Case study; Decision support; Knowledge representation; Nutrition; Preferences

Indexed keywords

ARBITRATION; ARGUMENTATION; BENEFIT-RISK ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORTS; PREFERENCES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DISEASE CONTROL; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; NUTRITION; PUBLIC HEALTH;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84876039511     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.059     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. L. Amgoud, and C. Cayrol A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34 2002 197 216
2. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., & Perrussel, L. (2000). An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences. In Proceedings of the international conference on formal and applied and practical reasoning (FAPR'00). (pp. 59-67).
3. L. Amgoud, and H. Prade Using arguments for making and explaining decisions Artificial Intelligence 173 3-4 2009 413 436
4. L. Amgoud, and H. Prade Using arguments for making and explaining decisions Artificial Intelligence 173 3-4 2009 413 436
5. AQUANUP. (2009). .
6. P. Baroni, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida Scc-recursiveness: A general schema for argumentation semantics Artificial Intelligence Journal 168 1-2 2005 162 210
7. T.J.M. Bench-Capon Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks Journal of Logic and Computation 13 3 2003 429 448
8. J. Bentahar, B. Moulin, and M. Bélanger A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation Artificial Intelligence Review 33 3 2010 211 259
9. P. Besnard, and A. Hunter Elements of argumentation 2008 The MIT Press
10. Bonet, B., & Geffner, H. (1996). Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In Proceedings of the 12th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI'96) (pp. 98-105).
11. J.-R. Bourguet, L. Amgoud, and R. Thomopoulos Contribution aux comparaisons formelles des modèles de préférences en argumentation Journées Francophones des Modèles formels de l'intéraction (MFI) 2009 81 92
12. Bourguet, J.-R., Amgoud, L., & Thomopoulos, R. (2010). Towards a unified model of preference-based argumentation. In International symposium of foundations of information and knowledge systems (FoIKS) (pp. 326-344).
13. J.-M. Bourre, A. Bégat, M.-C. Leroux, V. Mousques-Cami, N. Pérandel, and F. Souply Valeur nutritionnelle (macro et micro-nutriments) de farines et pains français Médecine et Nutrition 44 2 2008 49 76
14. D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, M. Pirlot, and H. Prade Decision-making process-concepts and methods 2009 Wiley
15. CADINNO (2008). Information, choix, consommateurs responsables: des leviers pour un développement durable? .
16. Dean, M., Sheperd, R., Arvola, A., Lampila, P., Lahteenmaki, L., Vassalo, M., Saba, A., Claupein, E., & Winkelmann, M. (2007). Report on consumer expectations of health benefits of modified cereal products. Tech. rep., University of Surrey, UK.
17. DINABIO (2008). In Proceedings of dinabio développement et innovation en agriculture biologique. .
18. S. Dubuisson-Quellier De la routine à la délibé ration. les arbitrages des consommateurs en situation d'achat Réseaux 135/136 2006 253 284
19. P.M. Dung On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games Artificial Intelligence Journal 77 1995 321 357
20. FCN (2009). Fibres, céréales et nutrition. .
21. J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys 2005 Springer-Verlag
22. J. Fox, and S. Das Safe and sound Artificial intelligence in hazardous applications 2000 AAAI Press, The MIT Press
23. E. Ginon, Y. Lohérac, C. Martin, P. Combris, and S. Issanchou Effect of fibre information on consumer willingness to pay for french baguettes Food Quality and Preference 20 2009 343 352
24. J. Gottsegen Using argumentation analysis to assess stakeholder interests in planning debates Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 22 4 1998 365 379
25. HEALTHGRAIN (2009). .
26. S. Kaci, and L. van der Torre Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48 3 2008 730 751
27. S. Kraus, K. Sycara, and A. Evenchik Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation Journal of Artificial Intelligence 104 1998 1 69
28. L.A. Maguire, and L.G. Boiney Resolving environmental disputes: A framework incorporating decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques Journal of Environmental Management 42 1 1994 31 48
29. PNNS (statutory documents). (2005). .
30. PNNS. (2005). .
31. I. Rahwan, and G. Simari Argumentation in artificial intelligence 2009 Springer
32. J. Slavin, and H. Green Diatery fibre and satiety British Nutrition Foundation 32 1 2007 32 42
33. K. Sycara Persuasive argumentation in negotiation Theory and Decision 28 1990 203 242