Perfusion measurement in brain gliomas with intravoxel incoherent motion MRI

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 256-262

  Federau, Christian ^a   Meuli, R ^a   O'Brien, K ^b   Maeder, P ^a   Hagmann, P ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894115669     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3686     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States. http://www. cbtrus.org. Accessed November 11, 2012
2. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. National Cancer Institute. www.seer.cancer.gov. Accessed November 11, 2012
3. Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191: 41-51
4. Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24: 1989-98
5. Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, et al. Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2008;247: 490-98
6. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, et al. Robbins&Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 7th ed. Paris, France: Elsevier Saunders; 2005
7. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168: 497-505
8. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42: 288-92
9. Le Bihan D, Turner R. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1992;27: 171-78
10. Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, et al. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motionMRimaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors. Radiology 2012;263: 770-77
11. Lemke A, Laun FB, Klauss M, et al. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters. Invest Radiol 2009;44: 769-75
12. Chandarana H, Kang SK, Wong S, et al. Diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of renal tumors with histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol 2012;47: 688-96
13. Sigmund EE, Cho GY, Kim S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer. Magn Reson Med 2011;65: 1437-47
14. Henkelman RM, Neil JJ, Xiang QS. A quantitative interpretation of IVIM measurements of vascular perfusion in the rat brain. Magn Reson Med 1994;32: 464-69
15. Turner R, Le Bihan D, Maier J, et al. Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology 1990;177: 407-14
16. Neil JJ, Bosch CS, Ackerman JJ.Anevaluation of the sensitivity of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) method of blood flow measurement to changes in cerebral blood flow. Magn Reson Med 1994;32: 60-65
17. Chenevert TL, Pipe JG, Williams DM, et al. Quantitative measurement of tissue perfusion and diffusion in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1991;17: 197-212
18. Le Bihan D, Moonen CT, van Zijl PC, et al. Measuring random microscopic motion of water in tissues with MR imaging: a cat brain study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15: 19-25
19. Wirestam R, Brockstedt S, Lindgren A, et al. The perfusion fraction in volunteers and in patients with ischaemic stroke. Acta Radiol 1997;38: 961-64
20. Federau C, Maeder P, O'Brien K, et al. Quantitative measurement of brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 2012;265: 874-81
21. Seber GA, Wild CJ. Nonlinear Regression. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience; 2003
22. Le Bihan D, Turner R, MacFall JR. Effects of intravoxel incoherent motions (IVIM) in steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging: applications to molecular diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1989;10: 324-37
23. Wirestam R, Borg M, Brockstedt S, et al. Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique. Acta Radiol 2001;42: 123-28
24. Andreou A, Koh DM, Collins DJ, et al. Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur Radiol 2013;23: 428-34
25. Federau C, O'Brien K, Meuli R, et al. Measuring brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): initial clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013. In press
26. Federau C, O'Brien K, Müller M, et al. Pulsatile microvascular perfusion demonstrated in the human brain with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. April 20-26, 2013
27. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusionweighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9: 53-60
28. Higano S, Yun X, Kumabe T, et al. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis. Radiology 2006;241: 839-46
29. Murakami R, Sugahara T, Nakamura H, et al. Malignant supratentorial astrocytoma treated with postoperative radiation therapy: prognostic value of pretreatment quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2007;243: 493-99
30. Scatliff JH, Radcliffe WB, Pittman HH, et al. Vascular structure of glioblastomas. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nuclear Med 1969;105: 795-805
31. Jain RK, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, et al. Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8: 610-22
32. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke: assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use. Stroke 2002;33: 1146-51
33. Knutsson L, Stahlberg F, Wirestam R. Absolute quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: pitfalls and possibilities. MAGMA 2010;23: 1-21
34. Petersen ET, Zimine I, Ho YC, et al. Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. Br J Radiol 2006;79: 688-701