Liposome-based semen extender is suitable alternative to egg yolk-based extender for cryopreservation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen

Animal Reproduction Science

Volumn 159, Issue , 2015, Pages 38-45

  Kumar, Pradeep ^a   Saini, Monika ^a   Kumar, Dharmendra ^a   Balhara, A K ^a   Yadav, S P ^a   Singh, P ^b   Yadav, P S ^a  

^a CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON BUFFALOES   (India)

^b NATIONAL DAIRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Buffalo; CASA; Cryopreservation; In vitro assessment; Semen quality

Indexed keywords

BUBALUS BUBALIS;

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; LIPOSOME;

ACROSOME; ANIMAL; BUFFALO; CRYOPRESERVATION; DRUG EFFECTS; EGG YOLK; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; VETERINARY;

ACROSOME; ANIMALS; BUFFALOES; CRYOPRESERVATION; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; EGG YOLK; LIPOSOMES; MALE; SEMEN; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM MOTILITY;

EID: 84937520366     PISSN: 03784320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aires V.A., Hinsch K.D., Mueller-Schloesser F., Bogner K., Mueller-Schloesser S., Hinsch E. In vitro and in vivo comparison of egg yolk-based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of bovine semen. Theriogenology 2003, 60:269-279.
2. Akhter S., Ansari M.S., Rakha B.A., Andrabi S.M.H., Iqbal S., Ullah N. Cryopreservation of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen in Bioxcells extender. Theriogenology 2010, 74:951-955.
3. Amirat L., Anton M., Tainturier D., Chatagnon G.R., Battut I., Courtens J.L. Modifications of bull spermatozoa induced by three extenders: Biociphos, low density lipoprotein and Triladyl, before, during and after freezing and thawing. Reproduction 2005, 129:535-543.
4. Amirat L., Tainturier D., Jeannaau L., Thorin C., Gerard O., Counters J.L., Anton M. Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation using egg yolk LDL: a comparison with Optidyl, a commercial egg yolk extender. Theriogenology 2004, 61:895-907.
5. Andrabi S.M.H. Factors affecting the quality of cryopreserved buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) bull spermatozoa. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2009, 44:552-569.
6. ++ influx in bovine spermatozoa. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 74:53-58.
7. Barlow P., Delvigne A., Van Dromme J. Predictive value of classical and automated sperm analysis for in vitro fertilization. Hum. Reprod. 1991, 6:119-124.
8. Bergeron A., Manjunath P. New insights towards understanding the mechanisms of sperm protection by egg yolk and milk. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2006, 73:1338-1344.
9. Budworth P.R., Ammann R.P., Hamerstedt R.H. A microcomputer-photographic method for evaluation of motility and velocity in bull sperm. J. Dairy Sci. 1987, 70:1927-1936.
10. Celeghini E.C.C., Arruda R.P., Andrade A.F.C., Nascimento J., Raphael C.F., Rodrigues P.H.M. Effects that bovine sperm cryopreservation using two different extenders has on sperm membranes and chromatin. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 104:119-131.
11. Chan S.Y.W., Wang C., Chan S.T.H., Ho P.C., So W.W.K., Chan Y.F., Ma H.K. Predictive value of sperm morphology and movement characteristics in the outcome of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. J. Vitro Fert. Embryo Transf. 1989, 6:142-148.
12. Courtens J.L., Ekwall H., Paquignon M., Ploen L. Preliminary study of water and some element contents in boar spermatozoa, before, during and after freezing. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1989, 87:613-626.
13. Crespilho A.M., Filho M.F., Aqua J.A., Nichi M., Monteiro G.C., Avanzi B.R., Martins A., Papa F.O. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extenders. Livestock Sci. 2012, 149:1-6.
14. David G., Serres C., Jouannet P. Kinematics of human spermatozoa. Gamete Res. 1981, 4:83-95.
15. Del Valle I., Gomez-Duran A., Holt W.V., Muino-Blanco T., Cebrian-Perez J.A. Soya lecithin interferes with mitochondrial function in frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. J. Androl. 2012, 33:717-725.
16. Fiser P.S. Interactions of cooling velocity, warming velocity and glycerol on the survival of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Reprod. Domest. Anim. Suppl. 1991, 1:123-137.
17. Forouzanfar M., Sharafi M., Hosseini S.M., Ostadhosseini S., Hajian M., Hosseini L., Abedi P., Nili N., Rahmani H.R., Nasr-Esfahani M.H. In vitro comparison of egg yolk-based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of ram semen. Theriogenology 2010, 73:480-487.
18. Gadea J., Sellés E., Marco M.A. The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2004, 39:303-308.
19. Gil M.C., García-Herreros M., Barón F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., García-Marín L.J. Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology 2009, 71:254-263.
20. Graham J.K., Foote R.H. Effect of several lipids, fatty acyl chain length, and degree of unsaturation on the motility of bull spermatozoa after cold shock and freezing. Cryobiology 1987, 24:42-52.
21. Holt W.V., Moore H.D.M., Hillier S.G. Computer-assisted measurement of sperm swimming speed in human semen: Correlation with in vitro fertilization assays. Fertil. Steril. 1985, 44:112-119.
22. Januskauskas A., Johannisson A., Rodríguez-Martínez H. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull semen in relation to sperm viability, chromatin structure and field fertility. Theriogenology 2003, 60:743-758.
23. Jones R.C., Stewart D.L. The effects of cooling to 5°C and freezing and thawing on the ultrastructure of bull spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1979, 56:233-238.
24. Katkov I.I., Lulat A.G. Do conventional CASA parameters reflect recovery of kinematics after freezing? "CASA paradox" in the analysis of recovery of spermatozoa after cryopreservation. Cryo Lett. 2000, 21:141-148.
25. Kjaestad H., Ropstad E., Andersen Berg K. Evaluation of spermatological parameters used to predict the fertility of frozen bull semen. Acta Vet. Scand. 1993, 34:299-303.
26. Kremer J. A simple sperm penetration test. Int. J. Fertil. 1965, 10:209-215.
27. Kumar D., Kumar P., Singh P., Yadav S.P., Yadav P.S. Assessment of sperm acrosome, plasma membrane, mitochondrial potential and DNA integrity by fluorescent probes in fresh, equilibrated and frozen-thawed buffalo semen. Cytotechnology 2014, 10.1007/s10616-014-9798-9.
28. Kumar P., Kumar D., Sikka P., Singh P. Sericin supplementation improves semen freezability of buffalo bulls by minimizing oxidative stress during cryopreservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 152:26-31.
29. Lipar J.L., Ketterson E.D., Nolan, Casto J.M. Egg yolk layers vary in the concentration of steroid hormones in two avian species. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1999, 115:220-227.
30. Matousek J., Riha J., Srsen V., Veselsky L., Lounda F. Penetration of cervical mucus and other body fluid by bull sperm in capillary tubes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1989, 18:161-166.
31. Mutalik S., Salian S.R., Avadhani K., Menon J., Joshi H., Hegde A.R., Kumar P., Kalthur G., Adiga S.K. Liposome encapsulated soy lecithin and cholesterol can efficiently replace chicken egg yolk in human semen cryopreservation medium. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2014, 60:183-188.
32. Pace M.M., Graham E.F. Components in egg yolk which protect bovine spermatozoa during freezing. J. Anim. Sci. 1974, 39:1144-1149.
33. Phillips P.H., Lardy H.A. Yolk-buffer pabulum for the preservation of bull semen. J. Dairy Sci. 1940, 23:399-404.
34. Pillet E., Labbe C., Batellier F., Duchamp G., Beaumal V., Anton M., Desherces S., Schmitt E., Magistrini M. Liposomes as an alternative to egg yolk in stallion freezing extender. Theriogenology 2012, 77:268-279.
35. Popov Y.N. Diagnosis of occult endometritis in cows (using white side test on cervical mucus). Vet. Moscow 1969, 4:85-87.
36. Rasul Z., Ahmad N., Anzar M. Changes in motion characteristics, plasma membrane integrity, and acrosome morphology during cryopreservation of buffalo spermatozoa. J. Androl. 2001, 22:278-283.
37. Röpke T., Oldenhof H., Leiding C., Sieme H., Bollwein H., Wolkers W.F. Liposomes for cryopreservation of bovine sperm. Theriogenology 2011, 76:1465-1472.
38. Sansone G., Nastri M.J.F., Fabbrocini A. Storage of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 62:55-76.
39. Sellés E., Gadea J., Romar R., Matas C., Ruiz S. Analysis of in vitro fertilizing capacity to evaluate the freezing procedures of boar semen and to predict the subsequent fertility. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2003, 38:66-72.
40. Serres C., Feneux D., Jouannet P., David G. Influence of the flagellar wave development and propagation on the human sperm movement in seminal plasma. Gamete Res. 1984, 9:183-193.
41. Singh P., Kumar D., Kumar P., Singh I., Yadav P.S. Cryopreservation and quality assessment of buffalo bull semen collected from farmer's doorstep. Agric. Res. 2013, 2:148-152.
42. Stålhammar E.M., Janson L., Philpsson J. The impact of sperm motility on non-return rate in preselected dairy bulls. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1994, 34:37-45.
43. Stradaioli G., Noro T., Sylla L., Monaci M. Decrease in glutathione (GSH) content in bovine sperm after cryopreservation: comparison between two extenders. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2007, 67:1249-2155.
44. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 2002, 57:149-179.
45. Vianna F.P., Papa F.O., Zahn F.S., Melo C.M., Dell'aqua J.A. Thermoresistance sperm tests are not predictive of potential fertility for cryopreserved bull semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 113:279-282.
46. Viviana A.A., Hinsch K.D., Mueller-Schloesser K.S., Bogner F., Mueller-Schloesser S., Hinsch E. In vitro and in vivo comparison of egg yolk based and soybean lecithin-based extenders for cryopreservation of bovine semen. Theriogenology 2003, 60:269-279.
47. Watson P.F. Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1995, 7:871-891.
48. Yildiz C., Bozkurt Y., Yavas I. An evaluation of soybean lecithin as an alternative to avian egg yolk in the cryopreservation of fish sperm. Cryobiology 2013, 67:91-94.