The impact of feedback of intraoperative technical performance in surgery: A systematic review

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Trehan, Abhishek ^a   Barnett Vanes, Ashton ^b   Carty, Matthew J ^c   McCulloch, Peter ^d   Maruthappu, Mahiben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANGIOPLASTY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COLON RESECTION; DATA BASE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOB PERFORMANCE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING CURVE; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SKILL; SURGEON; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; GENERAL SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ERROR; OPERATION DURATION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PRODUCTIVITY; STANDARDS; TEACHING;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EFFICIENCY; FEEDBACK; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL ERRORS; OPERATIVE TIME; TEACHING;

EID: 84937231363     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006759     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Tavare A. Where are we with transparency over performance of doctors and institutions? BMJ 2012; 345:e4464.
2. Breen KJ, Hogan AM, Mealy K. The detrimental impact of the implementation of the European working time directive (EWTD) on surgical senior house officer (SHO) operative experience. Ir J Med Sci 2013; 182:383-7.
3. Kairys JC, McGuire K, Crawford A.G., et al. Cumulative operative experience is decreasing during general surgery residency: a worrisome trend for surgical trainees? J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:804-11; discussion 811-3
4. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch J.M., et al. The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann Surg 1998; 228:320-30.
5. Carty MJ, Chan R, Huckman R., et al. A detailed analysis of the reduction mammaplasty learning curve: a statistical process model for approaching surgical performance improvement. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:706-14.
6. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers A.E., et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2117-27.
7. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, et al. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1434-42.
8. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Howdieshell T.R., et al. The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skill training. Am J Surg 2000; 179:341-3.
9. Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick R.K., et al. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am J Surg 2007; 193:105-10.
10. Van Sickle K.R., Gallagher AG, Smith CD The effect of escalating feedback on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:220-4.
11. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M., et al. Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2013; 257:839-44.
12. Harewood GC, Murray F, Winder S., et al. Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: the EFFECT trial. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 177:253-6.
13. Boyle E, Al-Akash M, Gallagher A.G., et al. Optimising surgical training: use of feedback to reduce errors during a simulated surgical procedure. Postgrad Med J 2011; 87:524-8.
14. Boyle E, O'Keeffe DA, Naughton PA, et al The importance of expert feedback during endovascular simulator training. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54:240-248 e1.
15. Grantcharov TP, Schulze S, Kristiansen VB The impact of objective assessment and constructive feedback on improvement of laparoscopic performance in the operating room. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:2240-3.
16. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L., et al. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008; 95:1088-97.
17. Dawe SR, Windsor JA, Broeders J.A., et al. A systematic review of surgical skills transfer after simulation-based training: laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopy. Ann Surg 2014; 259:236-48.
18. Gofton WT, Dudek NL, Wood T.J., et al. The Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE): a tool to assess surgical competence. Acad Med 2012; 87:1401-7.
19. van Hove P.D., Tuijthof GJ, Verdaasdonk E.G., et al. Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Br J Surg 2010; 97:972-87.
20. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Fraser S.A., et al. Evaluating intraoperative laparoscopic skill: direct observation versus blinded videotaped performances. Surg Innov 2007; 14:211-16.
21. Middaugh DJ. The 2-minute warning part v: conduct a post-game analysis and press conference. Medsurg Nurs 2012; 21:177-8.
22. Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra S.L., et al. Effects of virtual reality simulator training method and observational learning on surgical performance. World J Surg 2011; 35:245-52.
23. O'Connor A., Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CG How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc 2008; 22:1614-19.
24. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Heniford BT, et al. Limited feedback and video tutorials optimize learning and resource utilization during laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 2007; 142:202-6.
25. Ahmed M, Arora S, Russ S., et al. Operation debrief: a SHARP improvement in performance feedback in the operating room. Ann Surg 2013; 258:958-63.
26. Sender Liberman A., Liberman M, Steinert Y., et al. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach 2005; 27:470-2.
27. Jensen AR, Wright AS, Kim S, et al Educational feedback in the operating room: a gap between resident and faculty perceptions. Am J Surg 2012; 204:248-55.