Evaluation of formal feedback on endoscopic competence among trainees: The EFFECT trial

Irish Journal of Medical Science

Volumn 177, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 253-256

  Harewood, G C ^a   Murray, F ^a   Winder, S ^a   Patchett, S ^a  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Endoscopy training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTESTINE POLYP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FEEDBACK; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; IRELAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 48549098869     PISSN: 00211265     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-008-0161-z     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Harewood GC, Lieberman DA (2004) Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(1):72-77
2. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG (2001) One-time screening for colorectal cancer with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Eng J Med 345(8):555-556
3. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C et al (2004) A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: Are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53(2):277-283
4. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JJ, Greenlaw RL (2006) Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355(24):2533-2541
5. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, Li C, He J, Rabenek L (2004) Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: A population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 127(2):452-456
6. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH et al (2006) Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: Implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24(6):965-971
7. Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH (2006) Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: An introduction. Am J Gastroenterol 101(4):866-872
8. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: Recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97(6):1296-1308
9. Rex DK (2006) Quality in colonoscopy: Cecal intubation first, then what? Am J Gastroenterol 101:732-734
10. Harewood GC, Petersen BT, Ott BJ (2006) Prospective assessment of the impact of feedback on colonoscopy performance. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24(2):313-318
11. Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, O'Connor JB (2005) A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 61(1):72-75
12. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, deGarmo P (2003) Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 58(1):76-79