Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 46, Issue , 2015, Pages 318-330

  Budday, Silvia ^a   Nay, Richard ^b   de Rooij, Rijk ^c   Steinmann, Paul ^a   Wyrobek, Thomas ^b   Ovaert, Timothy C ^d   Kuhl, Ellen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b Bruker Corporation   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Gray matter; Indentation; Viscoelasticity; White matter

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; MAMMALS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; TISSUE; VISCOELASTICITY;

FLAT PUNCH INDENTATION; GRAY MATTER; INDIVIDUAL FEATURES; MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS; MECHANICAL ENVIRONMENT; NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS; STRUCTURAL DEGRADATION; WHITE MATTER;

INDENTATION;

ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BOVINE; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICS; WHITE MATTER;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CATTLE; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 84936948745     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bayly P.V., Taber L.A., Kroenke C.D. Mechanical forces in cerebral cortical folding: a review of measurements and models. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 29:568-581.
2. Blum M.M., Ovaert T.C. Experimental and numerical tribological studies of a boundary lubricant functionalized poro-viscoelastic PVA hydrogel in normal contact and sliding. J. Mech. Beh. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 14:248-258.
3. Böl M., Kruse R., Ehret A.E. On a staggered iFEM approach to account for friction in compression testing of soft materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 27:204-213.
4. Böl M., Ehret A.E., Leichsenring K., Weigert C., Kruse R. On the anisotropy of skeletal muscle tissue under compression. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10:3225-3234.
5. Budday S., Raybaud C., Kuhl E. A mechanical model predicts morphological abnormalities in the developing human brain. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:5644.
6. Budday S., Steinmann P., Kuhl E. The role of mechanics during brain development. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2014, 72:75-92.
7. Chatelin S., Constantinesco A., Willinger R. Fifty years of brain tissue mechanical testing: from in vitro to in vivo investigations. Biorheology 2010, 47:255-276.
8. Chen S., Bilston L.E. Unconfined compression of white matter. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:117-124.
9. Christ A.F., Franze K., Gautier H., Moshayedi P., Fawcett J., Franklin R.J.M., Karadottir R.T., Guck J. Mechanical difference between white and gray matter in the rat cerebellum measured by scanning force microscopy. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:2986-2992.
10. Elkin B.S., Morrison B. Viscoelastic properties of the P17 and adult rat brain from indentation in the coronal plane. J. Biomech. Eng. 2013, 135:114507.
11. Fallenstein G.T., Hulce V.D., Melvin J.W. Dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue. J. Biomech. 1969, 2:217-226.
12. Feng Y., Clayton E.H., Chang Y., Okamoto R.J., Bayly P.V. Viscoelastic properties of the ferret brain measured in vivo at multiple frequencies by magnetic resonance elastography. J. Biomech. 2013, 46:863-870.
13. Fountoulakis M., Hardmeier R., Höger H., Lubec G. Postmortem changes in the level of brain proteins. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 167:86-94.
14. Franceschini G., Bigoni D., Regitnig P., Holzapfel G.A. Brain tissue deforms similar to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory. .J Mech. Phys. Solids 2006, 54:2592-2620.
15. Franze K., Janmey P.A., Guck J. Mechanics in neuronal development and repair. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 15:227-251.
16. Galford J.E., McElhaney J.H. A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain, and dura. J. Biomech. 1970, 3:211-221.
17. Garcia J.A., Pena J.M., McHugh S., Jérusalem A. A model of the spatially dependent mechanical properties of the axon during its growth. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2012, 1:1-22.
18. Garo A., Hrapko M., van Dommelen J.A.W., Peters G.W.M. Towards a reliable characterization of the mechanical behavior of brain tissue. the effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation. Biorheology 2007, 44:51-58.
19. Gefen A., Margulies S.S. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1339-1352.
20. Goriely, A., Geers, M.G.D., Holzapfel, G.A., Jayamohan, J., Jerusalem, A., Sivaloganathan, S., Squier, W., van Dommelen, J.A.W., Waters, S., Kuhl, E., 2015. Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. doi:10.1007/s10237-015-0662-4.
21. Green M.A., Bilston L.E., Sinkurs R. In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 2008, 21:755-764.
22. Gupta S., Carrillo F., Li C., Pruitt L., Puttlitz C. Adhesive forces significantly affect elastic modulus determination of soft polymeric materials in nanoindentation. Mater. Lett. 2007, 61:448-451.
23. Hamhaber U., Sack I., Papazoglou S., Rump J., Klatt D., Braun J. Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Acta Biomater. 2007, 3:127-137.
24. Holland, M.A., Miller, K.E., Kuhl, E., 2015. Emerging brain morphologies from axonal elongation. Ann. Biomed. Eng., in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1312-9.
25. Holzapfel G.A., Ogden R.W. Elasticity of biopolymer filaments. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9:7320-7325.
26. Hutchinson B.L., Hutchinson L.A.D., Thompson J.M.D., Mitchell E.A. Plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in the first two years of life. a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics 2004, 114:970-980.
27. Jérusalem A., Dao M. Continuum modeling of a neuronal cell under blast loading. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8:3360-3371.
28. Kaster T., Sack I., Samani A. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of ex vivo brain tissue slices. J. Biomech. 2011, 44:1158-1163.
29. Kohn J.C., Ebenstein D.M. Eliminating adhesion errors in nanoindentation of compliant polymers and hydrogels. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 20:316-326.
30. Kruse S.A., Rose G.H., Glaser K.J., Manduca A., Felmlee J.P., Jack C.R., Ehman R.L. Magentic resonance elastography of the brain. NeuroImage 2008, 39:231-237.
31. Lang G.E., Stewart P.S., Vella D., Waters S.L., Goriely A. Is the Donnan effect sufficient to explain swelling in brain tissue slices?. J. R. Soc. Interface 2014, 11:20140123.
32. Liu K., VanLandingham M.R., Ovaert T.C. Mechanical characterization of soft viscoelastic gels via indentation and optimization-based inverse finite element analysis. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 2:355-363.
33. Metz H., McElhancy J., Ommaya A.K. A comparison of the elasticity of live, dead, and fixed brain tissue. J. Biomech. 1970, 3:453-458.
34. Miller K., Chinzei K. Constitutive modelling of brain tissue. experiment and theory. J. Biomech. 1997, 30:1115-1121.
35. Miller K. Biomechanics of the Brain 2011, Springer, New York.
36. Moore D.F., Jérusalem A., Nyein M., Noels L., Jaffee M.S., Radovitzky R.A. Computational biology - modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system. NeuroImage 2009, 47:T10-T20.
37. Oliver W.C., Pharr G.M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation. advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 2004, 19:3-20.
38. Pervin F., Chen W.W. Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression. J. Biomech. 2009, 42:731-735.
39. Prange M.T., Margulies S.S. Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124:244-252.
40. Prevost T.P., Balakrishnan A., Suresh S., Socrate S. Biomechanics of brain tissue. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:83-95.
41. Raybaud C., Widjaja E. Development and dysgenesis of the cerebral cortex. malformations of cortical development. Neuroimag. Clin. N. Am. 2011, 21:483-543.
42. Richman D.P., Stewart R.M., Hutchinson J.W., Caviness V.S. Mechanical model of brain convolutional development. Science 1975, 189:18-21.
43. Sun T., Hevner R.F. Growth and folding of the mammalian cerebral cortex. from molecules to malformations. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 15:217-231.
44. Tamura A., Hayashi S., Watanabe I., Nagayama K., Matsumoto T. Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in high-rate compression. J. Biomech. Sci. Eng. 2007, 2:115-126.
45. van Dommelen J.A.W., van der Sande T.P.J., Hrapko M., Peters G.W.M. Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation. interregional variation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 3:158-166.
46. Xu G., Knutsen A.K., Dikranian K., Kroenke C.D., Bayly P.V., Taber L.A. Axons pull on the brain, but tension does not drive cortical folding. J. Biomech Eng. 2010, 132:071013.
47. Zhang J., Michalenko M.M., Kuhl E., Ovaert T.C. Characterization of indentation response and stiffness reduction of bone using a continuum damage model. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 3:189-202.
48. Zilles K., Palomero-Gallagher N., Amunts K. Deveopment of cortical folding during evolution and ontogeny. Trends Neurosci. 2013, 36:275-284.