Fifty years of brain tissue mechanical testing: From in vitro to in vivo investigations

Biorheology

Volumn 47, Issue 5-6, 2010, Pages 255-276

  Chatelin, Simon ^a   Constantinesco, André ^a,b   Willinger, Rémy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

Author keywords

Literature review; magnetic resonance elastography; rheology

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN TISSUE; ELASTOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REVIEW; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; HAPLORHINI; HUMANS; MICE; RHEOLOGY; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 79952756961     PISSN: 0006355X     EISSN: 18785034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/BIR-2010-0576     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. K.B. Arbogast and S.S. Margulies, Regional differences in mechanical properties of the porcine central nervous system, in: Proc. 41stStapp Car Crash Conference, 1997, pp. 293-300 (No. SAE 973336).
2. K.B. Arbogast and S.S. Margulies, Material characterization of the brainstem from oscillatory shear tests, J. Biomech. 31 (1998), 801-807. (Pubitemid 28474682)
3. K.B. Arbogast and D.F. Meaney, Biomechanical characterization of the constitutive relationship of the brainstem, in: Proc. Soc. AutomotiveEngineers, 1995, pp. 153-159.
4. S.M. Atay, C.D. Kroenke and A. Sabet, Measurement of the dynamic shear modulus of mouse brain tissue in vivo by magnetic resonance elastography, J. Biomech. Eng. 130 (2008), 021013.
5. L.E. Bilston, Z. Liu and N. Phan-Thien, Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear, Biorheology 34 (1997), 377-385. (Pubitemid 28219059)
6. L.E. Bilston, Z. Liu and N. Phan-Thien, Large strain behaviour of brain tissue in shear: some new experimental data and differential constitutive model, Biorheology 38 (2001), 335-345. (Pubitemid 34014653)
7. D.W.A. Brands, P.H. Bovendeerd and G.W.M. Peters, Comparison of the dynamic behaviour of brain tissue and two model materials, in: Proc. 43rdStapp Car Crash Conference, 1999, pp. 313-320.
8. D.W.A. Brands, P.H. Bovendeerd and G.W.M. Peters, The large shear strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and a silicone gel model material, in: Proc. 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 2000, pp. 249-260.
9. J. Braun, G. Buntkowsky, J. Bernarding et al., Simulation and analysis ofmagnetic resonance elastography wave images using coupled harmonic oscillators and Gaussian local frequency estimation, Magn. Reson. Imag. 19 (2001), 703-713. (Pubitemid 32751602)
10. S. Cheng and L.E. Bilston, Unconfined compression ofwhite matter, J. Biomech. 40 (2007), 117-124.
11. S. Cheng, E.C. Clarke and L.E. Bilston, Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: a review, Med. Eng. Phys. 30 (2008), 1318-1337.
12. A.F. Christ, K. Franze, H. Gautier et al., Mechanical difference between white and gray matter in the rat cerebellum measured by scanning force microscopy, J. Biomech. 43 (2010), 2986-2992.
13. K.K. Darvish and J.R. Crandall, Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue, Med. Eng. Phys. 23 (2001), 633-645. (Pubitemid 34072901)
14. A. Di Ieva, F. Grizzi, E. Rognone et al., Magnetic resonance elastography: a general overview of its current and future applications in brain imaging, Neurosurg. Rev. 33 (2010), 137-145.
15. E. Diguet, E. van Houten, M. Green and R. Sinkus, High resolution MR Elastography mouse brain study: towards a mechanical atlas, in: Proc. 17th ISMRM Conference, 2009, p. 714.
16. M.C.H. Dodgson, Colloidal structure ofbrain, Biorheology 1 (1962), 21-30.
17. B.R. Donnelly, Brain tissue material properties: A comparison ofresults, in: Biomechanical Research: Experimental and Computational, Vol. 6, 1998, pp. 47-57.
18. M.S. Estes and J.H. McElhaney, Response of brain tissue to compressive loading, in: Proc. 4th ASME Biomechanics Conference, 1970.
19. G.T. Fallenstein, V.D. Hulce and J.W. Melvin, Dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue, J. Biomech. 2 (1969), 217-226.
20. G. Franceschini, D. Bigoni, P. Regitnig and G.A. Holzapfel, Brain tissue deforms similarly to filled elastomers and follows consolidation theory, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 54 (2006), 2592-2620. (Pubitemid 44566485)
21. J.E. Galford and J.H. McElhaney, A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain and dura, J. Biomech. 3 (1970), 211-221.
22. A. Garo, M. Hrapko, J.A.W. van Dommelen and G.W.M. Peters, Towards a reliable characterization of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: The effects of post-mortem time and sample preparation, Biorheology 44 (2007), 51-58. (Pubitemid 46706554)
23. A. Gefen, N. Gefen, Q. Zhu et al., Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat, J. Neurotrauma 20 (2003), 1163-1177. (Pubitemid 37467280)
24. A. Gefen and S.S. Margulies, Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?, J. Biomech. 37 (2004), 1339-1352. (Pubitemid 38953243)
25. M. Green, L. Bilston and R. Sinkus, High resolution 3D brain MR-elastography, in: Proc. International Societyfor Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 14, 2006.
26. M. Green, L. Bilston and R. Sinkus, In vivo brain viscoelastic properties measured by magnetic resonance elastography, NMR Biomed. 21 (2008), 755-764.
27. U. Hamhaber, I. Sack, S. Papazoglou et al., Three-dimensional analysis of shear wave propagation observed by in vivo magnetic resonance elastography of the brain, Acta Biomater. 3 (2007), 127-137. (Pubitemid 44804302)
28. M. Hrapko, J.A. van Dommelen, G.W. Peters and J.S.H.M. Wismans, The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modeling, Biorheology 43 (2006), 623-636. (Pubitemid 44580897)
29. M. Hrapko, J.A. van Dommelen, G.W. Peters and J.S.H.M. Wismans, The influence of test conditions on characterization ofthemechanicalproperties of brain tissue, J. Biomech. Eng. 130 (2008), 031003.1-031003.10.
30. D. Klatt, P. Asbach, J. Rump et al., In vivo determination of hepatic stiffness using steady-state free precession magnetic resonance elastography, Invest. Radiol. 41 (2006), 841-848. (Pubitemid 44747111)
31. J.B. Koenman, Viscoelastic properties of brain tissue, Unpublished MS thesis, Case Institute of Technology, 1966.
32. S.A. Kruse, G.H. Rose, K.J. Glaser et al., Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain, Neuroimage 39 (2007), 231-237. (Pubitemid 350102204)
33. C.J. Lewa, Magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of mechanical waves, Spectrosc. Lett. 24 (1991), 55-67.
34. (See also: in: IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proc., 1994, pp. 691-694 and J. Mag. Reson. Imag. 6 (1996), 652-656.
35. S.-C. Lin, S.-J. Shieh and M.J. Grimm, Ultrasonic measurements of brain tissue properties, in: Proc. Symposium Centers forDisease Control andPrevention, 1997, pp. 27-31.
36. A. Manduca, T.E. Oliphant, M.A. Dresner et al., Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping oftissue elasticity, Med. Image Anal. 5 (2001), 237-254. (Pubitemid 35282809)
37. P.J. McCracken, A. Manduca, J.P. Felmlee and R.L. Ehman, Mechanical transient-based magnetic resonance elastography, Magn. Reson. Med. 53 (2005), 628-639. (Pubitemid 40332284)
38. J.H. McElhaney, J.W. Melvin, V.L. Roberts and H.D. Portnoy, Dynamic characteristics of the tissues of the head, in: Perspectives in Biomedical Engineering, MacMillan Press, London, 1973, pp. 215-222.
39. H. Metz and D. Weber, Interpretations of impact responses of a 3-year-old child dummy relative to child injury potential, in: Proc. 9th International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, 1982.
40. K. Miller, Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures, J. Biomech. 32 (1999), 531-537. (Pubitemid 29199986)
41. K. Miller and K. Chinzei, Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory, J. Biomech. 30 (1997), 1115-1121. (Pubitemid 28026501)
42. K. Miller and K. Chinzei, Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension, J. Biomech. 35 (2002), 483-490. (Pubitemid 34273640)
43. K. Miller, K. Chinzei, G. Orssengo and P. Bednarz, Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation, J. Biomech. 33 (2000), 1369-1376. (Pubitemid 30625094)
44. R. Muthupillai, D. Lomas, P. Rossman, J.F. Greenleaf, A. Manduca and R.L. Ehman, Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization ofpropagating acoustic strain waves, Science269 (1995), 1854-1857.
45. S. Nicolle, M. Lounis and R. Willinger, Shear properties of brain tissue over a frequency range relevant for automotive impact situations: new experimental results, Stapp Car Crash J. 48 (2004), 239-258.
46. S. Nicolle, M. Lounis, R. Willinger and J.-F. Palierne, Shear linear behavior of brain tissue over a large frequency range, Biorheology 42 (2005), 209-223. (Pubitemid 40719240)
47. X. Ning, Q. Zhu, Y. Lanir and S.S. Margulies, A transversely isotropic viscoelastic constitutive equation for brainstem undergoing finite deformation, J. Biomech. Eng. 128 (2006), 925-933 (Pubitemid 46144923)
48. T.E. Oliphant, A. Manduca, R.L. Ehman and J.F. Greenleaf, Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation, Magn. Reson. Med. 45 (2001), 299-310. (Pubitemid 32119014)
49. A.K. Ommaya, Mechanicalproperties oftissues of the nervous system, J. Biomech. 1 (1968), 127-138.
50. F. Pervin and W.W. Chen, Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression, J. Biomech. 42 (2009), 731-735.
51. F. Pervin and W.W. Chen, Effect of inter-species, gender, and breeding on the mechanical behavior of brain tissue, NeuroImage 54(1) (2010), S98-S102.
52. G.W.M. Peters, J.H. Meulman and A.A.HJ. Sauren, The applicability of the time/temperature superposition principle to the brain tissue, Biorheology 34 (1997), 127-138. (Pubitemid 27360143)
53. M.T. Prange and S.S. Margulies, Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation, J. Biomech. Eng. 124 (2002), 244-252. (Pubitemid 34407069)
54. M.T. Prange, D.F. Meaney and S.S. Margulies, Defining brain mechanical properties: effects of region, direction and species, in: Proc. 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 2000, pp. 205-213.
55. T.P. Prevost, A. Balakrishnan, S. Suresh and S. Socrate, Biomechanics of brain tissue, Acta Biomater. 7 (2010), 83-95.
56. A.J. Romano, P.B. Abraham, P.J. Rossman et al., Determination and analysis of guided wave propagation using Magnetic Resonance Elastography, Magn. Reson. Med. 54 (2005), 893-900. (Pubitemid 41457061)
57. A.J. Romano, J.J. Shirron and A.J. Bucaro, On the noninvasive determination ofmaterial parameters from a knowledge of elastic displacements: theory and numerical simulation, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferro. Freq. Control 45 (1998), 751-759. (Pubitemid 128748734)
58. I. Sack, B. Beierbach, U. Hamhaber et al., Noninvasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography, NMR Biomed. 21 (2008), 265-271. (Pubitemid 351513674)
59. I. Sack, B. Beierbach, J. Wuerfel et al., The impact of aging and gender on brain viscoelasticity, Neuroimage 46 (2009), 652-657.
60. I. Sack, C.K. Mcgowan, A. Samani, C. Luginbuhl, W. Oaken and D.B. Plewes, Observation of non linear shear wave propagation using magnetic resonance elastography, Magn. Reson. Med. 52 (2004), 842-850. (Pubitemid 39314987)
61. F. Shen, T.E. Tay, J.Z. Li et al., Modified Bilston nonlinear viscoelastic model for finite element head injury studies, ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 128 (2006), 797-801. (Pubitemid 44622811)
62. L.Z. Shuck and S.H. Advani, Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear, ASME J. Basic Eng. 94 (1972), 905-911.
63. L.Z. Shuck, R.R. Haynes and J.L. Fogle, Determination of viscoelastic properties of human brain tissue, ASME paper, No. 70-BHF-12, 1970.
64. R. Sinkus, M. Tanter, S. Catheline et al., Imaging anisotropic and viscous properties of breast tissue by Magnetic Resonance Elastography, Magn. Reson. Med. 53 (2005), 372-387. (Pubitemid 40171052)
65. E.O. Stejskal and J.E. Tanner, Spin diffusion measurements: spin-echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient, J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1965), 288-292.
66. E.G. Takhounts, J.R. Crandall and K.K. Darvish, On the importance of brain tissue under large deformations, in: Proc. Stapp Car Crash Conference, 2003, pp. 79-92.
67. L.E. Thibault and T.A. Gennarelli, Biomechanics and craniocerebral trauma, central nervous system trauma, Status report, National Institutes of Health 24 (1985), 379-389.
68. K.L. Thibault and S.S. Margulies, Age-dependant material properties of the porcine brain cerebrum: effect on pediatric inertial head injury criteria, J. Biomech. 31 (1998), 1119-1126. (Pubitemid 29005180)
69. K. Uffmann, S. Maderwald, W. Ajaj et al., In vivo elasticity measurements of extremity skeletal muscle with MR elastography, NMR Biomed. 17 (2004), 181-190. (Pubitemid 39089245)
70. J.A.W. van Dommelen, T.P.J. van der Sande, M. Hrapko and G.W.M. Peters, Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: interregional variation, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 3 (2010), 158-166.
71. J. Vappou, E. Breton, P. Choquet et al., Magnetic resonance elastography compared with rotational rheometry for in vitro brain tissue viscoelasticity measurement, Magma 20 (2007), 273-278.
72. J. Vappou, E. Breton, P. Choquet et al., Assessment of in vivo and post mortem mechanical behavior of brain tissue using magneticresonance elastography, J. Biomech. 41 (2008), 2954-2959.
73. J. Vappou, R. Willinger, E. Breton et al., Dynamic viscoelastic shear properties of soft matter by magnetic resonance elastography using a low-field dedicated system, J. Rheol. 50 (2006), 531-541. (Pubitemid 44447610)
74. F. Velardi, F. Fraternali and M. Angelillo, Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 5 (2006), 53-61. (Pubitemid 43261230)
75. H.C. Wang and A.S. Wineman, A mathematical model for the determination of viscoelastic behavior of brain in vivo, J. Biomech. 5 (1972), 431-446.