Application of enhanced sampling Monte Carlo methods for high-resolution protein-protein docking in Rosetta

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2015, Pages

  Zhang, Zhe ^a   Schindler, Christina E M ^a   Lange, Oliver F ^a   Zacharias, Martin ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMODYNAMICS; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOFTWARE; WORKFLOW;

PROTEIN;

MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84936870616     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125941     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Stumpf MPH, Thorne T, de Silva E, Stewart R, An HJ, Lappe M, et al. Estimating the size of the human interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105: 6959-6964. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708078105 PMID: 18474861
2. Garma L, Mukherjee S, Mitra P, Zhang Y. How Many Protein-Protein Interactions Types Exist in Nature? PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e38913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038913 PMID: 22719985
3. Baker D. Protein folding, structure prediction and design. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014; 42: 225-229. doi: 10.1042/BST20130055 PMID: 24646222
4. Parmeggiani F, Huang P- S, Vorobiev S, Xiao R, Park K, Caprari S, et al. A general computational approach for repeat protein design. J Mol Biol. 2015; 427: 563-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.005 PMID: 25451037
5. London N, Ambroggio X. An accurate binding interaction model in de novo computational protein design of interactions: if you build it, they will bind. J Struct Biol. 2014; 185: 136-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.03.012 PMID: 23558036
6. Baker D. Prediction and design of macromolecular structures and interactions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2006; 361: 459-463. PMID: 16524834
7. Kortemme T, Joachimiak LA, Bullock AN, Schuler AD, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004; 11: 371-379. PMID: 15034550
8. Huang S-Y. Search strategies and evaluation in protein-protein docking: principles, advances and challenges. Drug Discov Today. 2014; 19: 1081-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.02.005 PMID: 24594385
9. Vajda S, Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2009; 19: 164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.008 PMID: 19327983
10. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992; 89: 2195-2199. PMID: 1549581
11. Lawrence MC, Colman PM. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 1994; 234: 946-950.
12. Zacharias M. Protein-protein docking with a reduced protein model accounting for side-chain flexibility. Protein Sci. 2003; 12: 1271-1282. PMID: 12761398
13. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, et al. Protein-Protein Docking with Simultaneous Optimization of Rigid-body Displacement and Side-chain Conformations. J Mol Biol. 2003; 331: 281-299. PMID: 12875852
14. Zhang Z, Lange OF. Replica Exchange Improves Sampling in Low-Resolution Docking Stage of RosettaDock. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(8): e72096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072096 PMID: 24009670
15. Lorenzen S, Zhang Y. Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization. Protein Sci. 2007; 16: 2716-2725. PMID: 17965193
16. Fernández Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2003; 52: 113-117. PMID: 12784376
17. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AMJJ. HADDOCK: A Protein-Protein Docking Approach Based on Biochemical or Biophysical Information. J Am Chem Soc. 2003; 125: 1731-1737. PMID: 12580598
18. Gray JJ. High-resolution protein-protein docking. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2006; 16: 183-193. PMID: 16546374
19. London N, Schueler-Furman O. Funnel hunting in a rough terrain: learning and discriminating native energy funnels. Structure. 2008; 16: 269-279. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.11.013 PMID: 18275818
20. Dill KA, Chan HS. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels. Nat Struct Biol 1997; 4: 10-19. PMID: 8989315
21. Camacho CJ, Weng Z, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Biophys J. 1999; 76: 1166-1178. PMID: 10049302
22. Swendsen RH, Wang JS. Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin-glasses. Phys Rev Lett. 1986; 57: 2607-2609. PMID: 10033814
23. Hansmann UHE. Parallel tempering algorithm for conformational studies of biological molecules. Chem Phys Lett. 1996; 281: 140-150.
24. Falcioni M, Deem MW. A biased Monte Carlo scheme for zeolite structure solution. J Chem Phys 1999; 110, 1754.
25. Sugita Y, Okamoto Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett. 1999; 314: 141-151.
26. Fukunishi H, Watanabe O, Takada S. On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. J Chem Phys. 2002; 116: 9058.
27. Hritz J, Oostenbrink C. Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics using soft-core interactions. J Chem Phys. 2008; 128: 144121. doi: 10.1063/1.2888998 PMID: 18412437
28. Luitz MP, Zacharias M. Protein-ligand docking using hamiltonian replica exchange simulations with soft core potentials. J Chem Inf Model. 2014; 54: 1669-1675. doi: 10.1021/ci500296f PMID: 24855894
29. Dantas G, Corrent C, Reichow SL, Havranek JJ, Eletr ZM, Isern NG, et al. High-resolution structural and thermodynamic analysis of extreme stabilization of human procarboxypeptidase by computational protein design. J Mol Biol. 2007; 366: 1209-1221. PMID: 17196978
30. Yanover C, Schueler-Furman O, Weiss Y. Minimizing and learning energy functions for side-chain prediction. J Comput Biol. 2008; 15: 899-911. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2007.0158 PMID: 18707538
31. Yan Q, de Pablo JJ. Hyper-parallel tempering Monte Carlo: Application to the Lennard-Jones fluid and the restricted primitive model. J Chem Phys. 1999; 111: 9509.
32. Yan Q, de Pablo JJ. Hyperparallel tempering Monte Carlo simulation of polymeric systems. J Chem Phys. 2000; 113: 1276-1282.
33. Earl DJ, Deem MW. Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2005; 7: 3910. PMID: 19810318
34. Rathore N, Chopra M, de Pablo JJ. Optimal allocation of replicas in parallel tempering simulations. J Chem Phys. 2005; 122: 024111. PMID: 15638576
35. Katzgraber HG, Trebst S, Huse DA, Troyer M. Feedback-optimized parallel tempering Monte Carlo. J Stat Mech. 2006: P03018-P03018.
36. Ostermeir K, Zacharias M. Advanced replica-exchange sampling to study the flexibility and plasticity of peptides and proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013; 1834: 847-853. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.12.016 PMID: 23298543
37. Barducci A, Bonomi M, Parrinello M. Metadynamics. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2011; 1: 826-843.
38. Laio A, Gervasio FL. Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science. Rep Prog Phys. 2008; 71: 126601.
39. Bonomi M, Parrinello M. Enhanced sampling in the well-tempered ensemble. Phys Rev Lett. 2010; 104: 190601. PMID: 20866953
40. Deighan M, Bonomi M, Pfaendtner J. Efficient Simulation of Explicitly Solvated Proteins in the Well- Tempered Ensemble. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012; 8: 2189-2192.
41. Chaudhury S, Berrondo M, Weitzner BD, Muthu P, Bergman H, Gray JJ. Benchmarking and Analysis of Protein Docking Performance in Rosetta v3.2. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e22477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022477 PMID: 21829626
42. Gray JJ, Moughon SE, Kortemme T, Schueler-Furman O, Misura KMS, Morozov AV, et al. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. 2003; 52: 118-122. PMID: 12784377
43. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Meth Enzymol. 2004; 383: 66-93. PMID: 15063647
44. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines. J Chem Phys. 1953; 21: 1087-1092.
45. Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL Jr. A Smoothed Backbone-Dependent Rotamer Library for Proteins Derived from Adaptive Kernel Density Estimates and Regressions. Structure. 2011; 19: 844-858. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.03.019 PMID: 21645855
46. Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M. Well-Tempered Metadynamics: A Smoothly Converging and Tunable Free-Energy Method. Phys Rev Lett. 2008; 100: 020603. PMID: 18232845
47. Hwang H, Vreven T, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0. Proteins. 2010; 78: 3111-3114. doi: 10.1002/prot.22830 PMID: 20806234
48. Hwang H, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins. 2008; 73: 705-709. doi: 10.1002/prot.22106 PMID: 18491384
49. Méndez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins. 2003; 52: 51-67. PMID: 12784368
50. Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009. Proteins. 2010; 78: 3073-3084. doi: 10.1002/prot.22818 PMID: 20806235