What Do We Mean by Performativity in Organizational and Management Theory? The Uses and Abuses of Performativity

International Journal of Management Reviews

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 440-463

  Gond, Jean Pascal ^a   Cabantous, Laure ^a   Harding, Nancy ^b   Learmonth, Mark ^c  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BRADFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (United Kingdom)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84936802835     PISSN: 14608545     EISSN: 14682370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12074     Document Type: Review

References (127)

1. Alvesson, M. and Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: the case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65, pp. 367–390.
2. Ashcraft, K.L., Kuhn, T.R. and Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: ‘materializing’ organizational communication. In Walsh, J.P. and Brief, A.P. (eds), The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 3. London: Routledge, pp. 1–64.
3. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Ball, S. (2003). The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18, pp. 215–228.
5. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, pp. 801–831.
6. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7. Barnes, B. (1983). Social life as bootstrapped induction. Sociology, 17, pp. 524–545.
8. Beunza, D., Hardie, I. and MacKenzie, D. (2006). A price is a social thing: towards a material sociology of arbitrage. Organization Studies 27, pp. 721–745.
9. Boje, D.M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: a postmodern analysis of Disney at ‘Tamara-Land’. Academy of Management Journal, 38, pp. 997–1035.
10. Borgerson, J. (2005). Judith Butler: on organizing subjectivities. Sociological Review, 53(S1), pp. 63–79.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Boxenbaum, E. and Rouleau, L. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 36, pp. 272–296.
14. Brown, A.D. and Lewis, M.A. (2011). Identities, discipline and routines. Organization Studies, 32, pp. 871–895.
15. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
18. Butler, J. (1999a). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
19. Butler, J. (1999b). Perfomativity's social magic. In Shusterman, R. (ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 113–128.
20. Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, pp. 147–161.
21. Cabantous, L. and Gond, J.-P. (2011). Rational decision-making as a ‘performative praxis’: explaining rationality's eternel retour. Organization Science, 22, pp. 573–586.
22. Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P. and Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010). Decision theory as practice: crafting rationality in organization. Organization Studies, 31, pp. 1531–1566.
23. Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P., Harding, N. and Learmonth, M. (forthcoming). Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations, doi:10.1177/0018726715584690.
24. Callon, M. (1998). The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Callon, M. and Muniesa, F. (2005). Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26, pp. 1229–1250.
27. Christensen, L.T., Morsing, M. and Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 10, pp. 372–393.
28. Cochoy, F., Giraudeau, M. and McFall, L. (2010). Performativity, economics and politics: an overview. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, pp. 139–146
29. Cooper, R. and Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: an introduction. Organization Studies, 9, pp. 91–112.
30. Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: how texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11, pp. 373–393.
31. Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J.P. and Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: an overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32, pp. 1149–1170.
32. Corvellec, H. (2003). Narratives of organizational performances. In Czarniawka, B. and Gagliardi, P. (eds), Narratives We Organize By. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 115–134.
33. Cowen, R. (1996). Performativity, post-modernity and the university. Comparative Education, 32, pp. 245–258.
34. Crary, A. (2002). The happy truth? J.L. Austin's How to Do Things with Words. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 45, pp. 59–80.
35. Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11, pp. 773–791.
36. Czarniawka, B. and Gagliardi, P. (eds) (2003). Narratives We Organize By. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. D'Adderio, L. (2008). The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37, pp. 769–789.
38. D'Adderio, L. and Pollock, N. (2014). Performing modularity: competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization. Organization Studies, 35, pp. 1813–1833.
39. Darr, A. and Pinch, T. (2013). Performing sales: material scripts and the social organization of obligation. Organization Studies, 34, pp. 1601–1621.
40. Denis, J. (2006). Preface: les nouveaux visages de la performativité. Études de Communication, 29, pp. 8–24.
41. Derrida, J. (1979). Signature event context. Glyph, 1, pp. 172–197.
42. Dey, P. and Steyaert, C. (2007). The troubadours of knowledge: passion and invention in management education. Organization, 14, pp. 437–461.
43. Didier, E. (2007). Do statistics ‘perform’ the economomy? In MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 276–310.
44. Diedrich, A., Eriksson-Zetterquist, U., Ewertsson, L., Hagberg, J., Hallin, A., Lavén, F., Lindberg, K., Raviola, E., Rindzeviciute, E. and Walter, L. (2013). Exploring the performativity turn in management studies. GRI-rapport 2013:2, Gothenburg Research Institute.
45. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edn. Oxford: Routledge.
46. Feldman, M.S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11, pp. 611–629.
47. Feldman, M.S. and Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, pp. 94–118.
48. Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J. and Sutton, R.I. (2005). Economic language and assumptions: how theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30, pp. 8–24.
49. Forguson, L.W. 2011 [1969]. Has Ayer vindicated the sense-datum theory? In Fan, K.T. (ed.), Symposium on JL Austin. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 309–341.
50. Fotaki, M. (2011). The sublime object of desire (for knowledge): sexuality at work in business and management schools in England. British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 42–53.
51. Ford, J. and Ford, L. (1995). The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 20, pp. 541–570.
52. Fourcade, M. (2007). Theories of markets, theories of society. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, pp. 1015–1034.
53. Fournier, V. and Grey, C. (2000). ‘At the critical moment’: conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53, pp. 7–32.
54. Friesl, M. and Larty, J. (2013). Replication of routines in organizations: existing literature and new perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 106–122.
55. Gehman, J., Trevino, L.K. and Garud, R. (2013). Values work: a process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56, pp. 84–112.
56. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
57. Grey, C. and Willmott, H. (eds) (2005). Critical Management Studies: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Guérard, S., Langley, A. and Seidl, D. (2013). From performance to performativity in strategy research. M@n@gement, 16, pp. 264–276.
59. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Hansen, N. (2012). J.L. Austin and literal meaning. European Journal of Philosophy. 22, pp. 617–632.
61. Harding, N. (2003). The Social Construction of Management. London: Routledge.
62. Harding, N., Lee, H., Ford, J. and Learmonth, M. (2011). Leadership and charisma: a desire that cannot speak its name? Human Relations, 64, pp. 927–949.
63. Hardy, C., Palmer, I. and Phillips, N. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53, pp. 1227–1248.
64. Hassard, J. and Cox, J.W. (2013). Can sociological paradigms still inform organizational analysis? A paradigm model for post-paradigm times. Organization Studies, 34, pp. 1701–1728.
65. Hodgson, D. (2005). ‘Putting on a professional performance’: performativity, subversion and project management. Organization, 12, pp. 51–68.
66. Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context. Organization Science, 16, pp. 618–636.
67. Jones, C. (2003). Theory after the postmodern condition. Organization, 10, pp. 503–525.
68. Kautz, K. and Jensen, T.B. (2013). Sociomateriality at the royal court of IS: a jester's monologue. Information and Organization, 23, pp. 15–27.
69. Keevers, L., Treleaven, L., Sykes, C. and Darcy, M. (2012). Made to measure: taming practices with results-based accountability. Organization Studies, 33, pp. 97–120.
70. Kenny, K. (2010). Beyond ourselves: passion and the dark side of identification in an ethical organization. Human Relations, 63, pp. 857–873.
71. Kieser, A., Nicolai, A. and Seidl, D. (2015). The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Academy of Management Annals, 9, pp. 1–115.
72. King, D. (2015) The possibilities and perils of critical performativity: Learning from four case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management 31, pp. 255–265.
73. Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011). Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030. Strategic Organization, 9, pp. 136–162.
74. Labatut, J., Aggeri, F. and Girard, N. (2012). Discipline and change: how technologies and organizational routines interact in new practice creation. Organization Studies, 33, pp. 39–69.
75. Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A.H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, pp. 1–13.
76. Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 264–280.
77. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Latour, B. (1996). Que peuvent apporter l'histoire et la sociologie des sciences aux sciences de la gestion? (The use of science studies to renew a few questions of organization theory). Paper presented at the XIII° Journées nationales des IAE, Toulouse.
79. Latour, B. (2005). Re-assembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Law, J. (2008). Actor-network theory and material semiotics. In Turner, B.S. (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 141–158.
81. Learmonth, M. (2005). Doing things with words: the case of management and administration. Public Administration, 83, pp. 617–637.
82. Leca, B., Gond, J. and Barin-Cruz, L. (2014). Building critical performativity engines for deprived communities. The construction of popular cooperative incubators in Brazil. Organization, 21, pp. 683–712.
83. Leonardi, P.M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, pp. 147–167.
84. Lyotard, J.-F. 1984 [1979]. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
85. MacKenzie, D. (2006). An Engine, Not a Camera. Cambridgr, MA: MIT Press.
86. MacKenzie, D. (2007). Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets. In MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. and Siu, L. (eds), Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 54–86.
87. MacKenzie, D. and Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing a theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Review of Sociology, 109, pp. 107–145.
88. Marshall, J.D. (1999). Performativity: Lyotard and Foucault through Searle and Austin. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18, pp. 309–317.
89. Marti, E. and Scherer, A. (2015). Financial regulation and social welfare: the critical contribution of management theory. Academy of Management Review, doi: 10.5465/amr.2013.0469.
90. McKinlay, A. (2010a). Performativity and the politics of identity: putting Butler to work. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, pp. 232–242.
91. McKinlay, A. (2010b). Performativity: From J.L. Austin to Judith Butler. In Armstrong, P. and Lightfoot, G. (eds), ‘The Leading Journal in the Field’. Destabilizing Authority in the Social Sciences of Management. London: MayFly Books, pp. 119–142.
92. Merton, R.K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, pp. 193–210.
93. Mesny, A. and Mailhot, C. (2012). Control and traceability of research impact on practice: reframing the ‘relevance gap’ debate in management. M@n@gement, 15, pp. 180–207.
94. Miller, J.H. (2009). For Derrida. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
95. Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
96. Muniesa, F. (2014). The Provoked Economy. Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. London: Routledge.
97. Mutch, A. (2013). Sociomateriality – taking the wrong turning? Information and Organization, 23, pp. 28–40.
98. Nyberg, D. (2009). Computers, customer service operatives and cyborgs: intra-actions in call centres. Organization Studies, 30, pp. 1181–1199.
99. Nyberg, D. and Wright, C. (2015). Performative and political: corporate constructions of climate change risk. Organization, doi: 10.1177/1350508415572038.
100. Orlikowski, W.J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, pp. 1435–1448.
101. Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2008). Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2, pp. 433–474.
102. Orlikowski, W.J. and Scott, S.V. (2014). What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organization Science, 25, pp. 868–891.
103. Oswick, C., Fleming, P. and Hanlon, G. (2011). From borrowing to blending: rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36, pp. 318–337.
104. Ozturk, M.B. and Rumens, N. (2014). Gay male academics in UK business and management schools: negotiating heteronormativities in everyday work life. British Journal of Management, 25, pp. 503–517.
105. Parker, M. (2001). Fucking management: queer, theory and reflexivity. Ephemera, 1, pp. 36–53.
106. Parker, M. and Jary, D. (1995). The mcuniversity: organisation, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2, pp. 319–338.
107. Parker Ryan, S. (2010). Reconsidering ordinary language philosophy: Malcolm's (Moore's) ordinary language argument. Essays in Philosophy, 11, pp. 123–149.
108. Pentland, B.T. and Rueter, H.H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp. 484–510.
109. Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
110. Rittenhofer, I. and Gatrell, C. (2012). Gender mainstreaming and employment in the European Union: a review and analysis of theoretical and policy literatures. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 201–216.
111. Rorty, R. (ed.) (1967). The Linguistic Turn, Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
112. Rumens, N. (2010). Workplace friendships between men: gay men's perspectives and experience. Human Relations, 63, pp. 1541–1152.
113. Schatzki, T.R. (2002). The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
114. Schoeneborn, D. and Scherer, A.G. (2012). Clandestine organizations, al Qaeda, and the paradox of (in)visibility: a response to Stohl and Stohl. Organization Studies, 33, pp. 963–971.
115. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. Spicer, A., Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62, pp. 537–560.
117. Stohl, C. and Stohl, M. (2011). Secret agencies: the communicative constitution of a clandestine organization. Organization Studies, 32, pp. 1197–1215.
118. Sutton, R.I. (2010). Sociomateriality: more academic jargon monoxyde [web log comment]. Available at: http://bobsutton.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/10/sociomateriality-more-academic-jargon-monoxide.html (accessed 8 June 2015).
119. Taylor, J.R. (1993). Rethinking the Theory of Organizational Communication: How to Read an Organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
120. Taylor, J.R. and Van Every, E.J. (2000). The Emergent Organization: Communication as its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121. Tyler, M. and Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31, pp. 175–198.
122. Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010). On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organization, 17, pp. 685–702.
123. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, pp. 409–421.
124. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 26, pp. 613–634.
125. Wickert, C. and Schaefer, S.M. (2015). Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68, pp. 107–130.
126. Wright, A. (2014). Organizational routines as embodied performatives: a communication as constitutive of organization perspective. Organization, doi: 10.1177/1350508414533165.
127. Zbaracki, M.J. and Bergen, M. (2010). When truces collapse: a longitudinal study of price-adjustment routines. Organization Science, 21, pp. 955–972.