Discipline and change: How technologies and organizational routines interact in new practice creation

Organization Studies

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 39-69

  Labatut, Julie ^a   Aggeri, Franck ^b   Girard, Nathalie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

disciplinary effects; institutional change; organizational routines; practice; technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 83755183883     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840611430589     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aggeri F.,Hatchuel A.'Socioeconomic orders' and the polarization of research in agriculture: For a critique of the relations between science and society.Sociologie du travail. 2003;45:113-133.
2. BardiniT. (1991). Modèle technique et modernisation: Le cas du lait de brebis dans le Rayon de Roquefort, 1950-1985. PhD thesis, Université Paris X.
3. Barillet F.The genetics of sheep. Piper L.Ruvinsky A., ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1997:539-564.
4. Barillet F.,Flamant J.-C.Principes de la sélection laitière, application à l'espèce ovine.Pâtre. 1977; (special issue 246): 21-31.
5. Barillet F.,Marie C.,Jacquin M.,Lagriffoul G.,Astruc J.-M.The French Lacaune dairy sheep breed: use in France and abroad in the last 40 years.Livestock Production Science. 2001;71:17-29.
6. Barley S. R.Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1986;31:78-108.
7. Barley S. R.Image of imaging: notes on doing longitudinal field work.Organization Science. 1990;1 (3): 220-247.
8. Barley S.R.,Tolbert P.S.Institutionalization and structuration: studying the links between action and institution.Organization Studies. 1997;18:93-117.
9. Barnard C.I.The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1938:.
10. Becker M.,Lazaric N.,Nelson R.R.,Winter S.G.Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005;14:775-791.
11. Callon M.,Muniesa F.Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices.Organization Studies. 2005;26:1229-1250.
12. Chapman C.S.,Cooper D.J.,Miller P.B.Accounting, organizations, and institutions. Chapman C.S.Cooper D.J.Miller P.B., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009:1-29.
13. Chesbrough H.,Spohrer J.A research manifesto for services science.Communication of the ACM. 2006;49 (7): 35-39.
14. Chia R.,Holt R.Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective.Organization Studies. 2006;25:635-655.
15. Cohen M.D.Reading Dewey: reflections on the study of routine.Organization Studies. 2007;28:773-786.
16. Cook S.D.,Brown J.S.Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing.Organization Science. 1999;10:381-400.
17. Cooper Robert,Burrell Gibson.Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: an introduction.Organization Studies. 1988;9:91-112.
18. Czarniawska B.Emerging institutions: pyramids or anthills?.Organization Studies. 2009;30:423-441.
19. D'Adderio L.The performativity of routines: theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics.Research Policy. 2008;37:769-789.
20. D'Adderio L.Organizational routines: Advancing empirical research. Becker M.C.Lazaric N., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2009:185-222.
21. DeSanctis G.,Poole M.S.Capturing the complexity in advanced technology used: adaptative structuration theory.Organization Science. 1994;5:141-147.
22. Eisenhardt K.M.Building theories from case study research.Academy Management Review. 1989;14:532-550.
23. Eisenhardt K.M.,Graebner M.E.Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:25-32.
24. Feldman M.S.Organizational routines as a source of continuous change.Organization Science. 2000;11:611-629.
25. Feldman M.S.A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2003;12:727-752.
26. Feldman M.S.,Orlikowski W.J.Theorizing practice and practicing theory.Organization Science. 2011;22:1240-1253.
27. Feldman M.S.,Pentland B.T.Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003;48:94-118.
28. Flamant J.-C.Histoire de races animales, histoires de sociétés humaines.Les cahiers de la Mission d'Animation des Agrobiosciences. 2002;1:1-17.
29. Garud R.,Rappa M.A.A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: the case of cochlear implants.Organization Science. 1994;5:344-362.
30. Grasseni C.Developing skill, developing vision: Practices of locality at the foot of the Alps. New York: Berghahn Books; 2009:.
31. Hacking I.Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983:.
32. Hasselbladh H.,Kallinikos J.The project of rationalization: a critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies.Organization Studies. 2000;21:697-720.
33. Hatchuel A.,Molet H.Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decision-making: about two cases studies.European Journal of Operational Research. 1986;24:178-186.
34. Hatchuel A.,Weil B.Experts in organizations: A knowledge-based perspective on organizational change. Paris: De Gruyter; 1995:.
35. Hatchuel A.,Pezet E.,Starkey K.Gouvernement, organisation et gestion, l'heritage de Michel Foucault. Quebec: Les Presses de l'Universite de Laval; 2005a:.
36. Hatchuel A.,Pezet E.,Starkey K.,Lenay O.Gouvernement, organisation et gestion: l'héritage de Michel Foucault. Hatchuel A.Pezet E.Starkey K., ed. Quebec, Les Presses de l'Université de Laval; 2005b:1-18.
37. Hopwood A.G.On trying to study accounting in contexts in which it operates.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1983;8:287-305.
38. Hopwood A.G.The archeology of accounting systems.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1987;12:207-234.
39. Hopwood A.G.,Miller P.Accounting as a social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994:.
40. Howard-Grenville J.A.The persistence of flexible organizational routines: the role of agency and organizational context.Organization Science. 2005;16:618-636.
41. Jarzabkowski P.,Seidl D.The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy.Organization Studies. 2008;29:1391-1426.
42. Joerges B.,Czarniawska B.The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world.Organization Studies. 1998;19:363-385.
43. Kaghan W.N.,Lounsbury M.Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism. Rafaeli A.Pratt M.G., ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006:259-275.
44. Labatut J.,Girard N.,Astruc J.M.,Bibé B.,Boisseau E.From individual practices to cooperation modes in a collective breeding organization: the case of local breed management in Western Pyrenees. European Symposium of the International Farming System Association; 2008Clermont Ferrand; 2008.
45. Lanzara G.F.,Patriotta G.The institutionalization of knowledge in an automotive factory: templates, inscriptions, and the problem of durability.Organization Studies. 2007;28:635-660.
46. Leonardi P.M.,Barley S.R.Materiality and change: challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing.Information and Organization. 2008;18:159-176.
47. Lounsbury M.A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:289-307.
48. Lounsbury M.Institutional rationality and practice variation: new directions in the institutional analysis of practice.Accounting, Organization and Society. 2008;33:349-361.
49. Lounsbury M.,Crumley E.T.New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation.Organization Studies. 2007;28:993-1012.
50. MacKenzie D.An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics.Social studies of science. 2003;33 (6): 831-868.
51. MacKenzie D.,Millo Y.Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of financial derivatives exchange.American Journal of Sociology. 2003;109:107-145.
52. Foucault, management and organization theory: From panopticon to technologies of self. McKinlay A.Starkey K., ed. London: Sage; 1998a:.
53. McKinlay A.,Starkey K.Foucault, management and organization theory: From panopticon to technologies of self. McKinlay A.Starkey K., ed. London: Sage; 1998b:230-241.
54. Meyer J.W.,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83:340-363.
55. Miller P.,O'Leary T.Mediating instruments and making markets: capital budgeting, science and the economy.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2007;32:701-734.
56. Moisdon J.-C.Du mode d'existence des outils de gestion. Paris: Seli Arslan; 1997:.
57. Moisdon J.-C.Gouvernement, organisation et gestion: l'héritage de Michel Foucault. Hatchuel A.Pezet E.Starkey K.Lenay O., ed. Laval: Les presses de l'université de Laval; 2006:.
58. Nelson R.R.,Nelson K.Technology, institutions, and innovation systems.Research Policy. 2002;31:265-272.
59. Nicolini D.Zooming in and out: studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections.Organization Studies. 2009;30:1391-1418.
60. Nowotny H.,Scott P.,Gibbons M.Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity; 2001:.
61. Orlikowski W.J.Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1435-1448.
62. Orlikowski W.J.,Barley S.R.Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?.MIS Quarterly. 2001;25:145-165.
63. Pentland B.T.,Feldman M.Organizational routines as a unit of analysis.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005;14:793-815.
64. Pentland B.T.,Feldman M.Narrative networks: patterns of technology and organization.Organization Science. 2007;18:781-795.
65. Pentland B.T.,Feldman M.Designing routines: on the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action.Information and Organization. 2008;18:235-250.
66. Pentland B.T.,Rueter H.R.Organizational routines as grammars of action.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1994;39:484-510.
67. Poly J.Talk delivered at the Rural Economic Society. 1959 1959;:.
68. Power M.Making things auditable.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1996;21:289-315.
69. Rerup C.,Feldman M.S.Routines as a source of change in organizational schema: the role of trial-and-error learning.Academy of Management Journal. 2011;54:577-610.
70. Salvato C.,Rerup C.Beyond collective entities: multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities.Journal of Management. 2011;37:468-490.
71. Schneiberg M.,Lounsbury M.The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage Publications Ltd. Greenwood R.Oliver C.Sahlin K.Suddaby R., ed. 2008:650-672.
72. Industrializing organisms, introducing evolutionary history. Schrepfer S.R.Scranton P., ed. New York and London: Routledge; 2003:.
73. Scott R.W.The adolescence of institutional theory.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1987;32:493-511.
74. Steyaert P.The Maraîchine breed: a biological object mediating various forms of knowledge.International Social Science Journal. 2006;58/187:87-96.
75. Townley B.Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management.Academy of Management Review. 1993;18:518-545.
76. Townley B.Foucault, management and organization theory: From Panopticon to technologies of self. McKinlay A.Starkey K., ed. London: Sage; 1998:191-210.
77. Utterback J.M.Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1994:.
78. Vissac B.Les vaches de la République. Paris: INRA Editions; 2002:.
79. Whittington R.Completing the practice turn in strategy research.Organization Studies. 2006;27:613-634.