Performing Modularity: Competing Rules, Performative Struggles and the Effect of Organizational Theories on the Organization

Organization Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1813-1843

  D’Adderio, Luciana ^a   Pollock, Neil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

ethnography; materiality; modularity; performativity; practices; reliability; routines

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912042808     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840614538962     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adler P. S.,Goldoftas B.,Levine D. I.Flexibility or efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system.Organization Science. 1999;10:43-67
2. Akrich M.Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Bijker W.E.Law J., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992:205-224.
3. The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Appadurai A., ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1986:
4. Austin J.How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1962:
5. Baldwin C. Y.,Clark K. B.Managing in an age of modularity.Harvard Business Review. 1997;75 (5): 84-93
6. Baldwin C. Y.,Clark K. B.Design rules: Volume 1. The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000:
7. Balogun J.,Johnson G.Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking.The Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:523-549
8. Barad K.Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.Signs. 2003;28:801-831
9. Barad K.Meeting the university halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2007:
10. Bechky B. A.Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor.Organization Science. 2003;14:312-330
11. Berg M.,Timmermans S.Orders and their others: On the constitution of universalities in medical work.Configurations. 2000;8:31-61
12. Beunza D.,Stark D.Tools of the trade: The sociotechnology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2004;13:369-400
13. Beunza D.,Hardie I.,MacKenzie D.A price is a social thing: Towards a material sociology of arbitrage.Organization Studies. 2006;27:721-745
14. Boland R. J.,Tenkasi R. V.Perspective-making and perspective-taking in communities of knowing.Organization Science. 1995;6:350-372
15. Brusoni S.,Prencipe A.Making design rules: A multidomain perspective.Organization Science. 2006;17:179-189
16. Brusoni S.,Prencipe A.,Pavitt K.Knowledge specialization, organization coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make?.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2001;46:597-625
17. Butler J.Bodies that matter. London, UK: Routledge; 1993:
18. Cabantous L.,Gond P.Rational decision making as performative praxis: Explaining rationality’s éternel retour.Organization Science. 2011;22:573-586
19. Cabantous L.,Gond J. P.,Johnson-Cramer M.Decision theory as practice: Crafting rationality in organizations.Organization Studies. 2010;31:1531-1566
20. CabantousL.GondJ.MilloY. (2014, July). Performativity as Politics: Rethinking Performativity and Power Dynamics. Call for papers for Sub-theme 43 for the 30th EGOS Colloquium, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1368706054887&subtheme_id=1334581237539
21. Callon M.Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge. Law J., ed. London, UK: Routledge; 1986:196-229.
22. Callon M.The laws of the markets. Callon M., ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1998:244-269.
23. Callon M.Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. MacKenzie D.Muniesa F.Siu L., ed. Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press; 2007:311-357.
24. Callon M.,Caliskan C.Economization, part 2: A research programme on the study of marketization.Economy and Society. 2010;39:1-32
25. Callon M.,Muniesa F.Economic markets as calculative collective devices.Organization Studies. 2005;26:1129-1250
26. Campagnolo D.,Camuffo A.The concept of modularity within the management studies: A literature review.International Journal of Management Reviews. 2009;12 (3): 259-283
27. Carlile P.Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries.Organization Science. 2004;15:555-568
28. Chandler A. D.The visible hand. Cambridge, UK: Belknap; 1977:
29. Chesbrough H.The business of systems integration. Prencipe A.Davies A.Hobday M., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003:174-198.
30. ChesbroughH.KusunokiK. (2001). The modularity trap: Innovation, technology phase shifts and the resulting limits of virtual organizations. In NonakaI.TeeceD. (Eds.), Managing industrial knowledge: Creation, transfer and utilization. (pp. 202–231). London, UK: Sage. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217573.n11
31. D’Adderio L.The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routine dynamics.Research Policy. 2008;37 (5): 769-789
32. Darr A.,Pinch T.Performing sales: Material scripts and the social organization of obligation.Organization Studies. 2013;34 (11): 1601-1621
33. Dougherty D.Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms.Organization Science. 1992;3:179-202
34. Feldman M. S.,Orlikowski W.Theorizing practice and practicing theory.Organization Science. 2011;22:1240-1253
35. Ferraro F.,Pfeffer J.,Sutton R. I.Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling.Academy of Management Review. 2005;30:8-24
36. Fleming L.,Sorenson O.The dangers of modularity.Harvard Business Review. 2001;79:20-21
37. Gibson C. B.,Birkinshaw J.The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity.The Academy of Management Journal. 2004;47:209-226
38. Glaser B.,Strauss A.The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research. London, UK: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson; 1967:
39. Greenwood R.,Raynard M.,Kodeih F.,Micelotta E. R.,Lounsbury M.Institutional complexity and organizational responses.The Academy of Management Annals. 2011;5:317-371
40. Henderson R. M.,Clark K. B.Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990;35:9-30
41. Hobday M.,Davies A.,Prencipe A.Systems integration: A core capability of the modern corporation.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005;14:1109-1143
42. Krippendorff K.Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004:
43. Langley A.Strategies for theorizing from process data.The Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:691-710
44. Langley A.,Tsoukas H.Process, sensemaking, and organizing. Hernes T.Maitlis S., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:1-26.
45. Langlois R. N.Modularity in technology and organization.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2002;49 (1): 19-37
46. Langlois R. N.The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2003;12:351-385
47. LaPorte T. R.,Consolini P.Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges in high reliability organizations.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1991;1:19-47
48. Latour B.Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987:
49. MacKenzie D.An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006:
50. MacKenzie D.Material markets: How economic agents are constructed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009:
51. MacKenzie D.,Millo Y.Constructing a market, performing a theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange.American Review of Sociology. 2003;109:107-145
52. Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. MacKenzie D.Muniesa F.Siu L., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:
53. March J.,Simon H.Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley; 1958:
54. Marengo L.,Pasquali C.,Valente M.Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of complex natural systems. Callebaut W.Rasskin-Gutman D., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:835-897.
55. Mol A.The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2005:
56. Narduzzo A.,Rocco E.,Warglien M.The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Dosi G.Nelson R. R.Winter S. G., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2000:27-50.
57. Nag R.,Corley K. G.,Gioia D. A.The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50:821-847
58. Nelson R. R.,Winter S. G.An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 1982:
59. Orlikowski W. J.,Scott S. V.Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization.The Academy of Management Annals. 2008;2:433-474
60. Orr J. E.Collective remembering: Memory in society. Middleton D. S.Edwards D., ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1990:
61. Orton J. D.,Weick K. E.Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization.Academy of Management Review. 1990;15:203-223
62. Parnas D. L.,Clements P. C.,Weiss D. M.The modular structure of complex systems.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 1985;11:259-266
63. Pentland B. T.Organizing moves in software support hotlines.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1992;37:527-548
64. Pentland B. T.,Feldman M.Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action.Information and Organizations. 2008;18:235-250
65. Pickering A.The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1995:
66. Pollock N.,Williams R. A.Software and organisations: The biography of the enterprise-wide system or how SAP conquered the world. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2009:
67. Poole M. S.,Van de Ven A.Using paradox to build management and organizational theory.Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:562-578
68. Purdy J. M.,Gray B.Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields.Academy of Management Journal. 2009;52:355-380
69. Rerup C.,Feldman M.Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning.Academy of Management Journal. 2011;54 (3): 577-610
70. Roberts K. H.Characteristics of one type of high reliability organization.Organization Science. 1990;1:160-176
71. Rousseau D. M.,Sitkin S. B.,Burt R. S.,Camerer C.Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust.Academy of Management Review. 1998;23:393-404
72. Russell A. L.Modularity: An interdisciplinary history of an ordering concept.Information and Culture. 2012;47 (3): 257-287
73. Sanchez R.,Mahoney J. T.Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design.Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17:63-76
74. The practice turn in contemporary theory. Schatzki T. R.Knorr Cetina K.von Savigny E., ed. London, UK: Routledge; 2001:
75. Schilling M.Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity.Academy of Management Review. 2000;25:312-335
76. Siggelkow N.Persuasion with case studies.Academy of Management Journal. 2007;50 (1): 20-24
77. Simon H.The architecture of complexity.Proceedings of the American Philosophy Society. 1962;106:467-482
78. Simon H.The sciences of the artificial. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: MIT Press.Boston, MA: MIT Press; 1996:
79. Soanes C.,Stevenson A.Oxford dictionary of English. (2005). Oxford dictionary of English (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005:
80. Suddaby R.What grounded theory is not.Academy of Management Journal. 2006;49:633-642
81. Strauss A.,Corbin J.Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990:
82. Sturgeon T. J.Modular production networks: A new American model of industrial organization.Industrial and Corporate Change. 2002;11:451-496
83. Suchman L.Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machine interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1987:
84. Takeishi A.Knowledge partitioning in the inter-firm division of labor: The case of automotive product development.Organization Science. 2002;13:321-338
85. Ulrich K. T.,Eppinger S. D.Product design and development. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1995:
86. Van Maanen J.The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979;24:539-550
87. Vaughan D.The Challenger launch decision. Chicago: University of Illinois Press; 1996:
88. Weick K. E.The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1979:
89. Weick K. E.,Roberts K. H.Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1993;38:357-381
90. Weick K. E.,Sutcliffe K. M.Managing the unexpected. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001:
91. Weick K. E.,Sutcliffe K. M.,Obstfeld D.Research in organizational behavior. Staw B. M.Sutton R., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1999:81-123.
92. West J.How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies.Research Policy. 2003;32:1259-1285
93. Womack J. P.,Jones D. T.Lean thinking. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1996: