Robot Form and Motion Influences Social Attention

ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

Volumn 2015-March, Issue , 2015, Pages 43-50

  Li, Alvin X ^a   Florendo, Maria ^a   Miller, Luke E ^a   Ishiguro, Hiroshi ^b   Saygin, Ayse P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

experimental psychology; humanlikeness; robot design; social attention; spatial attention

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; HUMAN REACTION TIME; MACHINE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL ROBOTS; VISUAL SERVOING;

EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN LIKENESS; ROBOT DESIGNS; SOCIAL ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84934951762     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21672148     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2696454.2696478     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Coradeschi, S., Ishiguro, H., Asada, M., Shapiro, S. C., Thielscher, M., Breazeal, C., Mataric, M. J. and Ishida, H. Human-inspired robots. Ieee Intelligent Systems, 21, 4 (Jul-Aug 2006), 74-85.
2. Breazeal, C. Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 3-4 (Mar 31 2003), 167-175.
3. Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y. and Ishiguro, H. Analysis of humanoid appearances in human-robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 3 2008), 725-735.
4. Seyama, J. and Nagayama, R. The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 162007), 337-351.
5. Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F. and Kageki, N. The uncanny valley [from the field]. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, 19, 2 2012), 98-100.
6. Mori, M. The uncanny valley. Energy, 7, 4 1970), 33-35.
7. Piwek, L., McKay, L. S. and Pollick, F. E. Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition, 130, 3 (Mar 2014), 271-277.
8. White, G., McKay, L. and Pollick, F. Motion and the uncanny valley. Journal of Vision, 7, 9 2007), 477-477.
9. MacDorman, K. F. and Ishiguro, H. The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7, 3 2006), 297-337.
10. Takano, E., Matsumoto, Y., Nakamura, Y., Ishiguro, H. and Sugamoto, K. The Psychological Effects of Attendance of an Android on Communication. Spr Tra Adv Robot, 542009), 221-228.
11. Hanson, D., Olney, A., Prilliman, S., Mathews, E., Zielke, M., Hammons, D., Fernandez, R. and Stephanou, H. Upending the uncanny valley. Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London; AAAI Press; MIT Press; 1999, City, 2005.
12. Bartneck, C., Croft, E., Kulic, D. and Zoghbi, S. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 1 2009), 71-81.
13. Adair, J. G. and Spinner, B. Subjects Access to Cognitive-Processes-Demand Characteristics and Verbal Report. J Theor Soc Behav, 11, 1 1981), 31-52.
14. Sardar, A., Joosse, M., Weiss, A. and Evers, V. Don't stand so close to me: users' attitudinal and behavioral responses to personal space invasion by robots. ACM, City, 2012.
15. MacDorman, K. F., Minato, T., Shimada, M., Itakura, S., Cowley, S. and Ishiguro, H. Assessing human likeness by eye contact in an android testbed. City, 2005.
16. Mutlu, B., Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. and Hagita, N. Nonverbal leakage in robots: communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. ACM, City, 2009.
17. Minato, T., Shimada, M., Itakura, S., Lee, K. and Ishiguro, H. Evaluating the human likeness of an android by comparing gaze behaviors elicited by the android and a person. Advanced Robotics, 20, 10 2006), 1147.
18. Cheetham, M., Pavlovic, I., Jordan, N., Suter, P. and Jancke, L. Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data. Frontiers in Psychology, 42013).
19. Seyama, J. i. and Nagayama, R. Probing the uncanny valley with the eye size aftereffect. Presence, 18, 5 2009), 321-339.
20. Cheetham, M., Suter, P. and Jancke, L. The human likeness dimension of the "Uncanny Valley Hypothesis": Behavioral and functional MRI findings. Front Hum Neurosci, 52011), 126.
21. Urgen, B. A., Plank, M., Ishiguro, H., Poizner, H. and Saygin, A. P. EEG theta and Mu oscillations during perception of human and robot actions. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 72013), 19.
22. Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J. and Frith, C. The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 7, 4 (Apr 2012), 413-422.
23. Tinwell, A., Grimshaw, M. and Williams, A. Uncanny behaviour in survival horror games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 2, 1 2010), 3-25.
24. Birmingham, E. and Kingstone, A. Human social attention. Prog Brain Res, 1762009), 309-320.
25. Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J. and Müller, H. J. I see what you mean: how attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PloS one, 7, 9 2012), e45391.
26. Mutlu, B., Shiwa, T., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. and Hagita, N. Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues. ACM, City, 2009.
27. Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J. and Hodgins, J. A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. IEEE, City, 2006.
28. Friesen, C. K. and Kingstone, A. The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 51998), 490-495.
29. Driver, J., Davis, G., Riccardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E. and Baron-Cohen, S. Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6, 5 1999), 509-540.
30. Posner, M. I. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 321980), 3-25.
31. Hietanen, J. K. Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation. Psychol Res, 66, 3 (Aug 2002), 174-179.
32. Hietanen, J. K. Does your gaze direction and head orientation shift my visual attention? Neuroreport, 10, 16 (Nov 8 1999), 3443-3447.
33. Admoni, H., Bank, C., Tan, J., Toneva, M., & Scassellati, B. Robot gaze does not reflexively cue human attention. . Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, USA 2011), 1983-1988.
34. Chaminade, T. and Okka, M. M. Comparing the effect of humanoid and human face for the spatial orientation of attention. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 72013), 12.
35. Thompson, J. C., Trafton, J. G. and McKnight, P. The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents. Perception, 40, 6 2011), 695-704.
36. Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P. and Tipper, S. P. Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychol Bull, 133, 4 (Jul 2007), 694-724.
37. Quadflieg, S., Mason, M. F. and Macrae, C. N. The owl and the pussycat: gaze cues and visuospatial orienting. Psychon Bull Rev, 11, 5 (Oct 2004), 826-831.
38. Langton, S. R. and Bruce, V. You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 26, 2 (Apr 2000), 747-757.
39. Langton, S. R. The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 53, 3 (Aug 2000), 825-845.
40. Hietanen, J. K. and Leppanen, J. M. Does facial expression affect attention orienting by gaze direction cues? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 29, 6 (Dec 2003), 1228-1243.
41. Farroni, T., Massaccesi, S., Pividori, D. and Johnson, M. H. Gaze following in newborns. Infancy, 5, 1 2004), 39-60.
42. Moore, C., Angelopoulos, M. and Bennett, P. The role of movement in the development of joint visual attention. Infant Behav Dev, 20, 1 (Jan-Mar 1997), 83-92.
43. Rohlfing, K. J., Longo, M. R. and Bertenthal, B. I. Dynamic pointing triggers shifts of visual attention in young infants. Developmental Science, 15, 3 (May 2012), 426-435.
44. Naccache, L., Blandin, E. and Dehaene, S. Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 5 2002), 416-424.
45. Wiese, E., Wykowska, A. and Müller, H. J. What we observe is biased by what other people tell us: Beliefs about the reliability of gaze behavior modulate attentional orienting to gaze cues. PloS one, 9, 4 2014), e94529.
46. Abrams, R. A. and Christ, S. E. Motion onset captures attention: A rejoinder to Franconeri and Simons (2005). Perception & psychophysics, 68, 1 2006), 114-117.
47. Parkhurst, D., Law, K. and Niebur, E. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42, 1 (Jan 2002), 107-123.
48. Langton, S. R. H., Law, A. S., Burton, A. M. and Schweinberger, S. R. Attention capture by faces. Cognition, 107, 1 (Apr 2008), 330-342.