Corrigendum to "Evaluation of bar, barnase, and barstar recombinant proteins expressed in genetically engineered Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) for potential risks of food allergy using bioinformatics and literature searches" [Food Chem. Toxicol. 83 (2015) 93-102] DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.06.003;Evaluation of Bar, Barnase, and Barstar recombinant proteins expressed in genetically engineered Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) for potential risks of food allergy using bioinformatics and literature searches

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 83, Issue , 2015, Pages 93-102

  Siruguri, Vasanthi ^a   Bharatraj, Dinesh Kumar ^a   Vankudavath, Raju Naik ^a   Rao Mendu, Vishnu Vardhana ^a   Gupta, Vibha ^b   Goodman, Richard E ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NUTRITION   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELHI   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergenicity; Bar; Barnase; Barstar; Bioinformatics; GM crops

Indexed keywords

RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN BAR; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN BARNASE; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN BARSTAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ACYLTRANSFERASE; ALLERGEN; BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS RIBONUCLEASE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; BARSTAR PROTEIN, BACILLUS AMYLOLIQUEFACIENS; PHOSPHINOTHRICIN N-ACETYLTRANSFERASE; PLANT ANTIGEN; PROTEIN INTAKE; RIBONUCLEASE;

ALLERGENICITY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BRASSICA JUNCEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; DNA SEQUENCE; FOOD ALLERGY; GENE INSERTION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MALE; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSGENE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BACILLUS; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ENZYMOLOGY; FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; GENETICS; HUMAN; INDIA; METABOLISM; MUSTARD; PLANT SEED; POLLINATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN INTAKE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STREPTOMYCES; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

BRASSICA JUNCEA;

ACETYLTRANSFERASES; ALLERGENS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANTIGENS, PLANT; BACILLUS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DIETARY PROTEINS; FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; HUMANS; INDIA; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUSTARD PLANT; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; POLLINATION; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; RIBONUCLEASES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEEDS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STREPTOMYCES;

EID: 84934922001     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: 18736351     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.09.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Aalberse R.C. Structural biology of allergens. J.Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2000, 106:228-238.
2. Beyer K., Eckermann O., Hompes S., Grabenhenrich L., Worm M. Anaphylaxis in an emergency setting - elicitors, therapy and incidence of severe allergic reactions. Allergy 2012, 67(11):1451-1456.
3. Bisht N.C., Jagannath A., Burma P.K., Pradhan A.K., Pental D. Retransformation of a male sterile barnase line with the barstar gene as an efficient alternative method to identify male sterile-restorer combinations for heterosis breeding. Plant Cell. Rep. 2007, 26:727-733.
4. Burks W. Current understanding of food allergy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 964:1-12.
5. Caballero M.L., Gómez M., González-Muñoz M., Reinoso L., Rodríguez-Pérez R., Alday E., Moneo I. Occupational sensitization to fungal enzymes used in animal feed industry. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2007, 144:231-239.
6. Codex Alimentarius Commission Alinorm 03/34: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Twenty-Fifth Session, Rome, Italy 30 June-5 July, 2003. Appendix III, Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from -DNA plants and Appendix IV, Annex on the assessment of possible allergenicity 2003, 47-60.
7. DBT Protocols for Food and Feed Safety Assessment of GE Crops 2008, Department of Biotechnology, GOI, New Delhi.
8. EFSA Scientific opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed. EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel). EFSA J. 2010, 8:1700.
9. Gieras A., Cejka P., Blatt K., Focke-Tejki M., Linhart B., Flicker S., Stoeckinger A., Marth K., Drescher A., Thalhamer J., Valent P., Majdic O., Valenta R. Mapping of conformational IgE epitopes with peptide-specific monoclonal antibodies reveals simultaneous binding of different antibodies to a surface patch on the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1. J.Immunol. 2011, 186(9):5333-5344.
10. Goodman R.G. Practical and predictive bioinformatics methods for the identification of potentially cross-reactive protein matches. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2006, 50:655-660.
11. Goodman R.E., Taylor S.L., Yamamura J., Kobayashi T., Kawakami H., Kruger C.L., Thompson G.P. Assessment of the potential allergenicity of a Milk Basic Protein fraction. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45:1787-1794.
12. Goodman R.E., Vieths S., Sampson H.A., Hill D., Ebisawa M., Steve L., Taylor S.L., van Ree R. Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops-what makes sense?. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:73-81.
13. Goodman R.E. Performing IgE serum testing due to bioinformatics matches in the allergenicity assessment of GM crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46:S24-S34.
14. Henikoff S., Henikoff J.G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89:10915-10919.
15. Henikoff J.G., Henikoff S. Blocks database and its applications. Methods Enzymol. 1996, 266:88-105.
16. ICMR Guidelines for Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Genetically Engineered Plants 2008, Indian Council of Medical Research. GOI, New Delhi.
17. Jagannath A., Bandyopadhyay P., Arumugam N., Gupta V., Burma P.K., Pental D. The use of spacer DNA fragment insulated the tissue specific expression of a cytotoxic gene (barnase) and allows high-frequency generation of transgenic male sterile lines in Brassica juncea L. Mol. Breed. 2001, 8:11-23.
18. Jagannath A., Arumugam N., Gupta V., Pradhan A., Burma P.K., Pental D. Development of transgenic barstar lines and identification of a male sterile (barnase)/restorer (barstar) combination for heterosis breeding in Indian oilseed mustard (Brassica juncea). Curr. Sci. 2002, 82:46-52.
19. Ladics G.S., Holsapple M.P., Astwood J.D., Kimber I., Knippels L.M.J., Helm R.M., Dong W. Workshop overview: approaches to the assessment of the allergenic potential of food from genetically modified crops. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 73:8-16.
20. Lehrer S.B., Ayuso R., Reese G. Current understanding of food allergens. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 964:69-85.
21. Metcalfe D.D., Astwood J.D., Townsend R., Sampson H.A., Taylor S.L., Fuch R.L. Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically modified crop plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996, 36:165-186.
22. Metcalfe D.D. Introduction: what are the issues in addressing the allergenic potential of genetically modified foods?. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111:1110-1113.
23. Mikkola R., Andersson M.A., Teplova V., Grigoriev P., Kuehn T., Loss S., Tsitko I., Apetroaie C., Saris N.E., Veijalainen P., Salkinoja-Salonen M.S. Amylosin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, a K+ and Na+ channel-forming toxic peptide containing a polyene structure. Toxicon 2007, 49:1158-1171.
24. Nordlee J.A., Taylor S.L., Townsend J.A., Thomas L.A., Bush R.K. Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybean. N.Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334:688-692.
25. Ofori-Anti A.O., Ariyarathna H., Chen L., Lee H.L., Pramod S.N., Goodman R.E. Establishing objective detection limits for the pepsin digestion assay used in the assessment of genetically modified foods. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2007, 52(2):94-103.
26. Pearson W.R., Lipman D.J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988, 85:2440-2448.
27. Pearson W.R. Flexible sequence similarity searching with the FASTA3 program package. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 132:185-219.
28. Peeters K.A.B.M., Koppelman S.J., van Hoffen E., van der Tas C.W.H., den Hartog Jager C.F., Penninks A.H., Hefle S.L., Bruihnzeel-Koomen C.A.F.M., Knol E.F., Knulst A.C. Does skin prick test reactivity to purified allergens correlate with clinical severity of peanut allergy?. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2007, 37:108-115.
29. Porterfield H.S., Murray K.S., Schlichting D.G., Chen X., Hansen K.C., Duncan M.W., Dreskin S.C. Effector activity of peanut allergens: a critical role for Ara h 2, Ara h 6, and their variants. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2009, 39(7):1099-1108.
30. Reese J.T., Pearson W.R. Empirical determination of effective gap penalties for sequence comparison. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:1500-1507.
31. Saris N.E., Andersson M.A., Mikkola R., Andersson L.C., Teplova V.V., Grigoriev P.A., Salkinoja-Salonen M.S. Microbial toxin's effect on mitochondrial survival by increasing K+ uptake. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2009, 25:441-446.
32. Sicherer S.H., Sampson H.A. Food allergy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. J.Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133:291-307.
33. Silvanovich A., Bannon G., McClain S. The use of E-scores to determine the quality of protein alignments. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 54:526-531.
34. Thomas K., Bannon G., Hefle S., Herouet C., Holsapple M., Ladics G., MacIntosh S., Laura Privalle L. In silico methods for evaluating human allergenicity to novel Proteins: International bioinformatics workshop meeting report, 23-24 February 2005. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 88:307-310.
35. Thomas K., MacIntosh S., Bannon G., Herouet-Guicheney C., Holsapple M. Scientific advancement of novel protein allergenicity evaluation: an overview of work from the HESI Protein Allergenicity Technical Committee (2000-2008). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2009, 47:1041-1050.
36. Valentine L. Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the plant: the David and Goliath of modern genetics. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133:948-955.