Affinity maturation of single-domain antibodies by yeast surface display

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 911, Issue , 2012, Pages 431-443

  Koide, Akiko ^a   Koide, Shohei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibody engineering; Combinatorial libraries; Molecular recognition; Phage display

Indexed keywords

NANOBODY;

ANTIBODY AFFINITY; ANTIBODY ENGINEERING; ARTICLE; COMBINATORIAL LIBRARY; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PHAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; YEAST SURFACE DISPLAY;

EID: 84934442832     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-968-6_26     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Muyldermans S (2001) Single domain camel antibodies: current status. J Biotechnol 74:277-302
2. Muyldermans S, Cambillau C, Wyns L (2001) Recognition of antigens by single-domain antibody fragments: the super fluous luxury of paired domains. Trends Biochem Sci 26:230-235
3. De Genst E, Silence K, Decanniere K, Conrath K, Loris R, Kinne J, Muyldermans S, Wyns L (2006) Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:4586-4591
4. Decanniere K, Desmyter A, Lauwereys M, Ghahroudi MA, Muyldermans S, Wyns L (1999) A single-domain antibody fragment in complex with RNase A: non-canonical loop structures and nanomolar affinity using two CDR loops. Structure 7:361-370
5. Desmyter A, Transue TR, Ghahroudi MA, Thi MH, Poortmans F, Hamers R, Muyldermans S, Wyns L (1996) Crystal structure of a camel single-domain VH antibody fragment in complex with lysozyme. Nat Struct Biol 3:803-811
6. Sidhu SS, Koide S (2007) Phage display for engineering and analyzing protein interaction interfaces. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:481-487
7. Sidhu SS, Lowman HB, Cunningham BC, Wells JA (2000) Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. Methods Enzymol 328:333-363
8. Boder ET, Wittrup KD (2000) Yeast surface display for directed evolution of protein expression, affinity, and stability. Methods Enzymol 328:430-444
9. VanAntwerp JJ, Wittrup KD (2000) Fine affinity discrimination by yeast surface display and flow cytometry. Biotechnol Prog 16:31-37
10. Koide A, Tereshko V, Uysal S, Margalef K, Kossiakoff AA, Koide S (2007) Exploring the capacity of minimalist protein interfaces: interface energetics and affinity maturation to pico-molar KD of a single-domain antibody with a flat paratope. J Mol Biol 373:941-953
11. Clackson T, Wells JA (1995) A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 267:383-386
12. Weiss GA, Watanabe CK, Zhong A, Goddard A, Sidhu SS (2000) Rapid mapping of protein functional epitopes by combinatorial alanine scanning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 8950-8954
13. Fellouse FA, Wiesmann C, Sidhu SS (2004) Synthetic antibodies from a four-amino-acid code: a dominant role for tyrosine in antigen recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 12467-12472
14. Koide A, Koide S (2007) Monobodies: antibody mimics based on the scaffold of the fibronectin type III domain. Methods Mol Biol 352:95-109
15. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH (2007) High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2:31-34
16. Gietz RD, Woods RA (2002) Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol 350:87-96
17. Ma H, Kunes S, Schatz PJ, Botstein D (1987) Plasmid construction by homologous recombination in yeast. Gene 58:201-216
18. Boder ET, Wittrup KD (1998) Optimal screening of surface-displayed polypeptide libraries. Biotechnol Prog 14:55-62