Prediction of physicochemical properties

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 929, Issue , 2012, Pages 93-138

  Dearden, John C ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aqueous solubility; Boiling point; Henry's law constant; Melting point; Partition coefficient; Physicochemical properties; pKa; Prediction; Prediction software; QSPR; QSPR guidelines; Quantitative structure property relationships; Vapor pressure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; MELTING POINT; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; SOLUBILITY; VAPOR PRESSURE;

EID: 84934435781     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-50-2_6     Document Type: Article

References (247)

1. van de Waterbeemd H (2009) Improving compound quality through in vitro and in silico profiling. Chem Biodivers 6:1760-1766
2. Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (2004) Calculation of physicochemical properties. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (eds) Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 31-40
3. Fisk PR, McLaughlin L, Wildey RJ (2004) Good practice in physicochemical property prediction. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (eds) Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 41-59
4. Webb TH, Morlacci LA (2010) Calculation of physic-chemical and environmental fate properties. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 118-147
5. Dearden JC (2004) QSAR modeling of bioaccumulation. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (eds) Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 333-355
6. Dearden JC (2004) QSAR modeling of soil sorption. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (eds) Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 357-371
7. Schuurmann G, Ebert R-U, Nendza M et al (2007) Predicting fate-related physicochemical properties. In: van Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire TG (eds) Risk assessment of chemicals: an introduction, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 375-426
8. Abraham MH, Chadha HS, Mitchell RC (1994) Hydrogen bonding. 32. An analysis of water-octanol and water-cyclohexane partitioning and the Dlog P parameter of Seiler. J Pharm Sci 83:1085-1100
9. Mannhold R, Poda GI, Ostermann C et al (2009) Calculation of molecular lipophilicity: state-of-the-art and comparison of log P methods on more than 96,000 compounds. J Pharm Sci 98:861-893
10. Dearden JC (2006) In silico prediction of aqueous solubility. Exp Opin Drug Discov 1:31-52
11. Livingstone DJ (2004) Building QSAR models: a practical guide. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ (eds) Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 151-170
12. SMILES: www.daylight.com/dayhtml-tutorials/languages/smiles/index.html
13. Nendza M, Aldenberg T, Benfenati E et al (2010) Data quality assessment for in silico methods: a survey of approaches and needs. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 59-117
14. Leonard JT, Roy K (2006) On selection of training and test sets for the development of predictive QSAR models. QSAR Comb Sci 25:235-251
15. Golbraikh A, Shen M, Xiao Z et al (2003) Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models. J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:241-253
16. Aquasol: www.pharmacy.arizona.edu/outreach/aquasol/
17. Tripos: www.tripos.com
18. Chemical & Physical Properties Database. www.dep.state.pa.us/ physicalproperties/CPP- search.htm
19. Chemical Database Service: cds.dl.ac.uk
20. ChemSpider: www.chemspider.com
21. Crossfire: info.crossfiredatabases.com
22. OCHEM: www.ochem.eu
23. OECD eChemPortal: www.echemportal.org
24. OECD QSAR Toolbox: www.qsartoolbox. org
25. OSHA: www.osha.gov/web/dep/chemicaldata/
26. PhysProp: www.syrres.com/what-we-d0/product.aspx?id?133
27. Wagner AB (2001) Finding physical properties of chemicals: a practical guide for scientists, engineers, and librarians. Sci Technol Lib 21(3/4):27-45
28. Oyarzabal J, Pastor J, Howe TJ (2009) Optimizing the performance of in silico ADMET general models according to local requirements: MARS approach. Solubility estimations as case study. J ChemInfModel 49:2837-2850
29. Dearden JC (1990) Physico-chemical descriptors. In: Karcher W, Devillers J (eds) Practical applications of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in environmental chemistry and toxicology. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 25-59
30. Maran U, Sild S, Tulp I et al (2010) Molecular descriptors from two-dimensional chemical structure. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 148-192
31. Ran YQ, Jain N, Yalkowsky SH (2001) Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds by the general solubility equation (GSE). J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41: 1208-1217
32. ADAPT: research.chem.psu.edu/pcjgroup/adapt.html
33. Molecular Discovery: www.moldiscovery.com
34. SemiChem: www.semichem.com
35. Biobyte: www.biobyte.com
36. Accelrys: www.accelrys.com
37. Dragon: www.talete.mi.it/products/dragon- description.htm
38. eDragon: www.vcclab.org/lab/edragon/
39. ChemComp: www.chemcomp.com
40. EduSoft: www.edusoft-lc.com/molconn/
41. vLifeSciences: www.vlifesciences.com
42. Livingstone D (1995) Data analysis for chemists. Oxford University Press, Oxford
43. Rowe PH (2010) Statistical methods for continuous measured endpoints in in silico toxicology. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 228-251
44. SimulationsPlus: www.simulations-plus.com
45. FQS Poland: www.fqs.pl
46. VCCLAB: www.vcclab.org
47. MSI: www.msi.umn.edu/sw/cerius2
48. VSN International: www.vsni.co.uk/software/genstat/
49. MathWorks: www.mathworks.com
50. Minitab: www.minitab.com
51. NCSS: www.ncss.com
52. IDBS: www.idbs.com
53. ProChemist: pro.chemist.online.fr
54. GNU: www.gnu.org/software/pspp/
55. SAS: www.sas.com
56. Scigress Explorer: www.scigress-explorer.software. informer.com
57. SPSS: www.spss.com
58. StatSoft: www.statsoft.com
59. Schrodinger: www.schrodinger.com
60. Tetko IV, Bruneau P, Mewes H-W et al (2006) Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions? Drug Disc Today 11:700-707
61. Walker JD, Dearden JC, Schultz TW et al (2003) QSARs for new practitioners. In: Walker JD (ed) Quantitative structure-activity relationships for pollution prevention, toxicity screening, risk assessment, and web applications. SETAC, Pensacola, FL, pp 3-18
62. Eriksson L, Jaworska J,Worth AP et al (2003) Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs. Environ Health Perspect 111:1361-1375
63. Dearden JC (2003) Quantitative structure-property relationships for prediction of boiling point, vapor pressure, and melting point. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1696-1709
64. Dearden JC, Schuurmann G (2003) Quantitative structure-property relationships for predicting Henry?s law constant from molecular structure. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1755-1770
65. QMRF Database: qsardb.jrc.it/qmrf/
66. Danish QSAR Database: www.130.226.165. 14/index.html
67. ACD/Labs: www.acdlabs.com
68. ChemAxon: www.chemaxon.com
69. CambridgeSoft: www.cambridgesoft.com
70. UFZ: www.ufz.de/index.php?en=6738
71. ChemSilico: www.chemsilico.com
72. Daylight: www.daylight.com
73. Episuite: www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm
74. ChemSW: www.chemsw.com
75. Molinspiration: www.molinspiration.com
76. Chemistry Database Software: www.chemdbsoft. com
77. CompuDrug: www.compudrug.com
78. G & P Engineering Software. www.gpengineeringsoft.com
79. MW Software: www.mwsoftware.com/dragon
80. ProPred: www.capec.kt.dtu.dk
81. SPARC: ibmlc2.chem.uga.edu/sparc
82. TerraBase: www.terrabase-inc.com
83. Optibrium: www.optibrium.com
84. Dearden JC (1985) Partitioning and lipophilicity in quantitative structure-activity relationships. Environ Health Perspect 61:203-228
85. Hansch C, Maloney PP, Fujita T et al (1962) Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature 194:178-180
86. Nendza M(1998) Structure-activity relationships in environmental sciences. Chapman & Hall, London
87. Reinhard M, Drefahl A (1999) Estimating physicochemical properties of organic compounds. Wiley, New York, NY
88. Leo A (2000) Octanol/water partition coefficients. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 89-114
89. Mannhold R, van de Waterbeemd H (2001) Substructure and whole molecule approaches for calculating log P. Comput Aided Mol Des 15:337-354
90. Livingstone DJ (2003) Theoretical property predictions. Curr Top Med Chem 3: 1171-1192
91. Klopman G, Zhu H (2005) Recent methodologies for the estimation of n-octanol/water partition coefficients and their use in the prediction of membrane transport properties of drugs. Mini Rev Med Chem 5:127-133
92. Fujita T, Iwasa J, Hansch C (1964) A new substituent constant, p, derived from partition coefficients. J Am Chem Soc 86:5175-5180
93. Nys GG, Rekker RF (1973) Statistical analysis of a series of partition coefficients with special reference to the predictability of folding of drug molecules. Introduction of hydrophobic fragmental constants (f values). Chim Ther 8:521-535
94. Rekker RF (1977) The hydrophobic fragmental constant. Elsevier, Amsterdam
95. Leo A, Jow PYC, Silipo C et al (1975) Calculation of hydrophobic constant (log P) from p and f values. J Med Chem 18:865-868
96. Bodor N, Gabanyi NZ, Wong C-K (1989) A new method for the estimation of partition coefficient. J Am Chem Soc 111:3783-3786
97. Klopman G, Wang S (1991) A computer automated structure evaluation (CASE) approach to calculation of partition coefficient. J Comput Chem 12:1025-1032
98. Ghose AK, Pritchett A, Crippen GM (1988) Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships: III. Modeling hydrophobic interactions. J Comput Chem 9:80-90
99. Liu R, Zhou D (2008) Using molecular fingerprint as descriptors in the QSPR study of lipophilicity. J Chem Inf Model 48:542-549
100. Chen H-F (2009) In silico log P prediction for a large data set with support vector machines, radial basis neural networks and multiple linear regression. Chem Biol Drug Des 74:142-147
101. Tetko IV, Tanchuk VYu, Villa AEP (2001) Prediction of n-octanol/water partition coefficients from PHYSPROP database using artificial neural networks and E-state indices. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:1407-1421
102. Hall LH, Kier LB (1999) Molecular structure description: the electrotopological state. Academic, New York, NY
103. Dearden JC, Netzeva TI, Bibby R (2003) A comparison of commercially available software for the prediction of partition coefficient. In: Ford M, Livingstone D, Dearden J et al (eds) Designing drugs and crop protectants: processes, problems and solutions. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 168-169
104. Sakuratani Y, Kasai K, Noguchi Y et al (2007) Comparison of predictivities of log P calculation models based on experimental data for 134 simple organic compounds. QSAR Comb Sci 26:109-116
105. COSMOlogic: www.cosmologic.de
106. Varnek A, Fourches D, Solov?ev VP et al (2004) "In silico" design of new uranyl extractants based on phosphoryl-containing podands: QSPR studies, generation and screening of virtual combinatorial library, and experimental tests. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:1365-1382
107. Dearden JC, Cronin MTD, Schultz TW et al (1995) QSAR study of the toxicity of nitrobenzenes to Tetrahymena pyriformis. Quant Struct Act Relat 14:427-432
108. Katritzky AR, Wang Y, Sild S et al (1998) QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of air-water partition coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:720-725
109. Yalkowsky SH, Banerjee S (1992) Aqueous solubility: methods of estimation for organic compounds. Dekker, New York, NY
110. Mackay D (2000) Solubility in water. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals: environmental and health sciences. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 125-139
111. Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (1993) Environmental organic chemistry. Wiley, New York, NY
112. Johnson SR, Zheng W (2006) Recent progress in the computational prediction of aqueous solubility and absorption. AAPS J 8: E27-E40
113. ECETOC Technical Report No. 89 (2003) (Q)SARs: evaluation of the commercially available software for human health and environmental endpoints with respect to chemical management applications. ECETOC, Brussels
114. Hansch C, Quinlan JE, Lawrence GL (1968) The linear free energy relationship between partition coefficients and aqueous solubility of organic liquids. J Org Chem 33:347-350
115. Yalkowsky SH, Valvani SC (1980) Solubility and partitioning I: solubility of nonelectrolytes in water. J Pharm Sci 69:912-922
116. Hughes LD, Palmer DS, Nigsch F et al (2008) Why are some properties more difficult to predict than others? A study of QSPR models of solubility, melting point, and log P. J Chem Inf Model 48:220-232
117. Sanghvi T, Jain N, Yang G et al (2003) Estimation of aqueous solubility by the general solubility equation (GSE) the easy way. QSAR Comb Sci 22:258-262
118. Abraham MH, Le J (1999) The correlation and prediction of the solubility of compounds in water using an amended solvation energy relationship. J Pharm Sci 88:868-880
119. Votano J.R., Parham M, Hall LH et al (2004) Prediction of aqueous solubility based on large datasets using several QSPR models utilizing topological structure representation. Chem Biodivers 11:1829-1841
120. Raevsky OA, Raevskaja OE, Schaper K-J (2004) Analysis of water solubility data on the basis of HYBOT descriptors. Part 3. Solubility of solid neutral chemicals and drugs. QSAR Comb Sci 23:327-343
121. Klopman G, Zhu H (2001) Estimation of the aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:439-445
122. Palmer DS, O?Boyle NM, Glen RC et al (2007) Random forest models to predict aqueous solubility. J Chem Inf Model 47: 150-158
123. Lind P, Maltseva T (2003) Support vector machines for the estimation of aqueous solubility. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1855-1859
124. Duchowicz PR, Talevi A, Bruno-Blanch LE et al (2008) New QSPR study for the prediction of aqueous solubility of drug-like compounds. Bioorg Med Chem 16:7944-7955
125. Duchowicz PR, Castro EA (2009) QSPR studies on aqueous solubilities of drug-like compounds. Int J Mol Sci 10:2558-2577
126. Huuskonen J, Livingstone DJ, Manallack DT (2008) Prediction of drug solubility from molecular structure using a drug-like training set. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:191-212
127. Yang G-Y, Yu J, Wang Z-Y et al (2007) QSPR study on the aqueous solubility (lgS(w)) and n-octanol/water partition coefficients (lgK(ow)) of polychlorinated dibenzo-pdioxins (PCDDs). QSAR Comb Sci 26: 352-357
128. Wei X-Y, Ge Z-G, Wang Z-Y et al (2007) Estimation of aqueous solubility (lgS(w)) of all polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners by density function theory and position of Cl substitution (N-PCS) method. Chinese J Struct Chem 26:519-528
129. Dearden JC, Netzeva TI, Bibby R (2003) A comparison of commercially available software for the prediction of aqueous solubility. In: Ford M, Livingstone D, Dearden J et al (eds) Designing drugs and crop protectants: processes, problems and solutions. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 169-171
130. Dearden JC. Unpublished information
131. Harris JC, Hayes MJ (1990) Acid dissociation constant. In: Lyman WJ, Reehl WF, Rosenblatt DH (eds) Handbook of chemical property estimation methods. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 6.1-6.28
132. Brown TN, Mora-Diez N (2006) Computational determination of aqueous pKa values of protonated benzimidazoles (Part 2). J Phys Chem B 110:20546-20554
133. Kaschula CH, Egan TJ, Hunter R et al (2002) Structure-activity relationships in 4- aminoquinoline antiplasmodials. The role of the group at the 7-position. J Med Chem 45:3531-3539
134. Soriano E, Cerdan S, Ballesteros P (2004) Computational determination of pK(a) values. A comparison of different theoretical approaches and a novel procedure. J Mol Struct Theochem 684:121-128
135. Klopman G, Fercu D (1994) Application of the multiple computer automated structure evaluation methodology to a quantitative structure-activity relationship study of acidity. J Comput Chem 15:1041-1050
136. Klamt A, Eckert F, Diedenhofen M et al (2003) First principles calculations of aqueous pK(a) values for organic and inorganic acids using COSMO-RS reveal an inconsistency in the slope of the pK(a) scale. J Phys Chem A 107:9380-9386
137. Eckert F, Klamt A (2006) Accurate prediction of basicity in aqueous solution with COSMORS. J Comput Chem 27:11-19
138. Lee AC, Yu J-Y, Crippen GM (2008) pKa prediction of monoprotic small molecules the SMARTS way. J Chem Inf Model 48:2042-2053
139. Milletti F, Storchi L, Sforna G et al (2007) New and original pKa prediction method using GRID molecular interaction fields. J Chem Inf Model 47:2172-2181
140. Cruciani G, Milletti F, Storchi L et al (2009) In silico prediction and ADME profiling. Chem Biodivers 6:1812-1821
141. Parthasarathi R, Padmanabhan J, Elango M et al (2006) pKa prediction using group philicity. J Phys Chem A 110:6540-6544
142. Tsantili-Kakoulidou A, Panderi I, Csizmadia F et al (1997) Prediction of distribution coefficient from structure 2. Validation of PrologD, an expert system. J Pharm Sci 86: 1173-1179
143. Hilal SH, Karickhoff SW, Carreira LA (1995) A rigorous test for SPARC?s chemical reactivity models: estimation of more than 4300 ionisation pKa?s. Quant Struct Act Relat 14: 348-355
144. Lee PH, Ayyampalayam SN, Carreira LA et al (2007) In silico prediction of ionization constants of drugs. Mol Pharm 4:498-512
145. Kuhne R, Ebert R-U, Schuurmann G (2006) Model selection based on structural similarity- method description and application to water solubility prediction. J Chem Inf Model 46:636-641
146. Dearden JC, Cronin MTD, Lappin DC (2007) A comparison of commercially available software for the prediction of pKa. J Pharm Pharmacol 59(suppl 1):A-7
147. Liao C, Nicklaus MC (2009) Comparison of nine programs predicting pKa values of pharmaceutical substances. J Chem Inf Model 49:2801-2812
148. MelounM, Bordovska S (2007) Benchmarking and validating algorithms that estimate pKa values of drugs based on their molecular structure. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1267-1281
149. Balogh GT, Gyarmati B, Nagy B et al (2009) Comparative evaluation of in silico pKa prediction tools on the Gold Standard dataset. QSAR Comb Sci 28:1148-1155
150. Manchester J,Walkup G, Rivin O et al (2010) Evaluation of pKa estimation methods on 211 druglike compounds. J Chem Inf Model 50:565-571
151. Dearden JC (1991) The QSAR prediction of melting point, a property of environmental relevance. Sci Total Environ 109(110):59-68
152. Horvath AL (1992) Molecular design: chemical structure generation from the properties of pure organic compounds. Elsevier, Amsterdam
153. Dearden JC (1999) The prediction of melting point. In: Charton M, Charton B (eds) Advances in quantitative structure-property relationships, vol 2. JAI Press, Stamford, CT, pp 127-175
154. Tesconi M, Yalkowsky SH (2000) Melting point. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 3-27
155. Mills EJ (1884) On melting point and boiling point as related to composition. Phil Mag 17:173-187
156. Katritzky AR, Maran U, Karelson M et al (1997) Prediction of melting points for the substituted benzenes. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:913-919
157. Abramowitz R, Yalkowsky SH (1990) Estimation of aqueous solubility and melting point of PCB congeners. Chemosphere 21:1221-1229
158. Tsakanikas PD, Yalkowsky SH (1988) Estimation of melting point of flexible molecules: aliphatic hydrocarbons. Toxicol Environ Chem 17:19-33
159. Abramowitz R, Yalkowsky SH (1990) Melting point, boiling point and symmetry. Pharm Res 7:942-947
160. Zhao L, Yalkowsky SH (1999) A combined group contribution and molecular geometry approach for predicting melting points of aliphatic compounds. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:3581-3584
161. Todeschini R, Vighi M, Finizio A et al (1997) 3-D modelling and prediction by WHIM descriptors. Part 8. Toxicity and physicochemical properties of environmental priority chemicals by 2D-TI and 3D-WHIM descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res 7:173-193
162. Bergstrom CAS, Norinder U, Luthman K et al (2003) Molecular descriptors influencing melting point and their role in classification of solid drugs. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43: 1177-1185
163. Modarresi H, Dearden JC, Modarress H (2006) QSPR correlation of melting point for drug compounds based on different sources of molecular descriptors. J Chem Inf Model 46:930-936
164. Godavarthy SS, Robinson RL, Gasem KAM (2006) An improved structure-property model for predicting melting-point temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:5117-5126
165. Karthikeyan M, Glen RC, Bender A (2005) General melting point prediction based on a diverse compound data set and artificial neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 45:581-590
166. Joback KG, Reid RC (1987) Estimation of pure-component properties from group contributions. Chem Eng Commun 57:233-243
167. Simamora P, Yalkowsky SH (1994) Group contribution methods for predicting the melting points and boiling points of aromatic compounds. Ind Eng Chem Res 33: 1405-1409
168. Constantinou L, Gani R (1994) New group contribution method for estimating properties of pure compounds. Am Inst Chem Eng J 40:1697-1710
169. Marrero J, Gani R (2001) Group-contribution based estimation of pure component properties. Fluid Phase Equil 183-184:183-208
170. Tu C-H, Wu Y-S (1996) Group-contribution estimation of normal freezing points of organic compounds. J Chin Inst Chem Eng 27:323-328
171. Gold PI, Ogle GJ (1969) Estimating thermophysical properties of liquids. Part 4-Boiling, freezing and triple-point temperatures. Chem Eng 76:119-122
172. Lyman WJ (2000) Boiling point. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals: environmental and health sciences. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 29-51
173. BanksWH(1939) Considerations of a vapour pressure-temperature equation, and their relation to Burnop?s boiling point function. J Chem Soc 292-295
174. Rechsteiner CE (1990) Boiling point. In: Lyman WJ, Reehl WF, Rosenblatt DH (eds) Handbook of chemical property estimations methods. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 12.1-12.55
175. Ivanciuc O, Ivanciuc T, Cabrol-Bass D et al (2000) Evaluation in quantitative structure- property relationship models of structural descriptors derived from information-theory operators. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40: 631-643
176. Girones X, Amat L, Robert D et al (2000) Use of electron-electron repulsion energy as a molecular descriptor in QSAR and QSPR studies. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14: 477-485
177. Katritzky AR, Mu L, Lobanov VS et al (1996) Correlation of boiling points with molecular structure. 1. A training of 298 diverse organics and a test set of 9 simple inorganics. J Phys Chem 100:10400-10407
178. Sola D, Ferri A, Banchero M et al (2008) QSPR prediction of N-boiling point and critical properties of organic compounds and comparison with a group-contribution method. Fluid Phase Equil 263:33-42
179. Wessel MD, Jurs PC (1995) Prediction of normal boiling points for a diverse set of industrially important organic compounds from molecular structure. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35:841-850
180. Basak SC, Mills D (2001) Use of mathematical structural invariants in the development of QSPR models. Commun Math Comput Chem 44:15-30
181. Hall LH, Story CT (1996) Boiling point and critical temperature of a heterogeneous data set. QSAR with atom type electrotopological state indices using artificial neural networks. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36:1004-1014
182. Kier LB, Hall LH (1999) Molecular structure description: the electrotopological state. Academic, San Diego, CA
183. Stein SE, Brown RL (1994) Estimation of normal boiling points from group contributions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 34:581-587
184. Labute P (2000) A widely applicable set of descriptors. J Mol Graph Model 18:464-477
185. Ericksen D, Wilding WV, Oscarson JL et al (2002) Use of the DIPPR database for development of QSPR correlations: normal boiling point. J Chem Eng Data 47:1293-1302
186. Grain CF (1990) Vapor pressure. In: Lyman WJ, Reehl WF, Rosenblatt DH (eds) Handbook of chemical property estimation methods. American Chemical Society,Washington, DC, pp 14.1-14.20
187. Delle Site A (1996) The vapor pressure of environmentally significant organic chemicals: a review of methods and data at ambient temperature. J Phys Chem Ref Data 26: 157-193
188. Sage ML, Sage GW (2000) Vapor pressure. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals: environmental and health sciences. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 53-65
189. Katritzky AR, Slavov SH, Dobchev DA et al (2007) Rapid QSPR model development technique for prediction of vapor pressure of organic compounds. Comput Chem Eng 31:1123-1130
190. Liang CK, Gallagher DA (1998) QSPR prediction of vapor pressure from solely theoretically-derived descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:321-324
191. Tu C-H (1994) Group-contribution method for the estimation of vapor pressures. Fluid Phase Equil 99:105-120
192. Oberg T, Liu T (2008) Global and local PLS regression models to predict vapor pressure. QSAR Comb Sci 27:273-279
193. Basak SC, Mills D (2009) Predicting the vapour pressure of chemicals from structure: a comparison of graph theoretic versus quantum chemical descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res 20:119-132
194. Goll ES, Jurs PC (1999) Prediction of vapor pressures of hydrocarbons and halohydrocarbons from molecular structure with a computational neural network model. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39:1081-1089
195. Staikova M, Wania F, Donaldson DJ (2004) Molecular polarizability as single-parameter predictor of vapor pressures and octanol-air partitioning coefficients of nonpolar compounds: a priori approach and results. Atmos Environ 38:213-225
196. Andreev NN, Kuznetsov SE, Storozhenko SY (1994) Prediction of vapour pressure and boiling points of aliphatic compounds. Mendeleev Commun 173-174
197. Kuhne R, Ebert R-U, Schuurmann G (1997) Estimation of vapour pressures for hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons from chemical structure by a neural network. Chemosphere 34:671-686
198. Yaffe D, Cohen Y (2001) Neural network based temperature-dependent quantitative structure property relationships (QSPRs) for predicting vapor pressure of hydrocarbons. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:463-477
199. Godavarthy SS, Robinson RL, Gasem KAM (2006) SVRC-QSPR model for predicting saturated vapor pressure of pure fluids. Fluid Phase Equil 246:39-51
200. Schuurmann G, Rothenbacher C (1992) Evaluation of estimation methods for the air-water partition coefficient. Fresenius Environ Bull 1:10-15
201. Mackay D, Shiu WY, Ma KC (2000) Henry?s law constant. In: Boethling RS, Mackay D (eds) Handbook of property estimation methods for chemicals: environmental and health sciences. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 69-87
202. Dearden JC, Cronin MTD, Ahmed SA et al (2000) QSPR prediction of Henry?s law constant: improved correlation with new parameters. In: Gundertofte K, Jorgensen FS (eds) Molecular modeling and prediction of bioactivity. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, NY, pp 273-274
203. Hine J, Mookerjee PK (1974) The intrinsic hydrophilic character of organic compounds. Correlations in terms of structural contributions. J Org Chem 40:292-298
204. Cabani S, Gianni P, Mollica V et al (1981) Group contributions to the thermodynamic properties of non-ionic organic solutes in dilute aqueous solution. J Solut Chem 10:563-595
205. Meylan WM, Howard PH (1991) Bond contribution method for estimating Henry?s law constants. Environ Toxicol Chem 10: 1283-1293
206. Nirmalakhandan NN, Speece RE (1988) QSAR model for predicting Henry?s constant. Environ Sci Technol 22:1349-1357
207. Russell CJ, Dixon SL, Jurs PC (1992) Computer-assisted study of the relationship between molecular structure and Henry?s law constant. Anal Chem 64:1350-1355
208. Modarresi H, Modarress H, Dearden JC (2007) QSPR model of Henry?s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach. Chemosphere 66:2067-2076
209. Abraham MH, Andonian-Haftvan J, Whiting GS et al (1994) Hydrogen bonding. Part 34. The factors that influence the solubility of gases and vapours in water at 298 K, and a new method for its determination. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2:1777-1791
210. Yaffe D, Cohen Y, Espinosa G et al (2003) A fuzzy ARTMAP-based quantitative structure- property relationship (QSPR) for the Henry?s law constant of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:85-112
211. Gharagheizi F, Abbasi R, Tirandazi B (2010) Prediction of Henry?s law constant of organic compounds in water from a new group-contribution- based model. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:10149-10152
212. Katritzky AR, Mu L, Karelson M (1996) A QSPR study of the solubility of gases and vapors in water. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36: 1162-1168
213. Walker JD, Jaworska J, Comber MHI et al (2003) Guidelines for developing and using quantitative structure-activity relationships. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1653-1665
214. Dearden JC, Cronin MTD (2006) Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in drug design. In: Smith HJ (ed) Introduction to the principles of drug design and action, 4th edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, pp 185-209
215. Madden JC (2010) Introduction to QSAR and other in silico methods to predict toxicity. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 11-30
216. OECD Principles: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf
217. OECD Guidelines: www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2004doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00009192/ $FILE/JT00176183.PDF
218. Dearden JC, Cronin MTD, Kaiser KLE (2009) How not to develop a quantitative structure-activity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR). SAR QSAR Environ Res 20:241-266
219. Ghafourian T, Dearden JC (2000) The use of atomic charges and orbital energies as hydrogen- bonding-donor parameters for QSAR studies: comparison of MNDO, AM1 and PM3 methods. J Pharm Pharmacol 52: 603-610
220. Hartung T, Bremer S, Casati S et al (2004) A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. ATLA 32:467-472
221. Netzeva TI, Worth A, Aldenberg T et al (2005) Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop
222. ATLA 33:155-173
223. Hewitt M, Ellison CM (2010) Developing the applicability domain of in silico models: relevance, importance and methods. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 301-333
224. Flynn GL (1990) Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption. In: Gerrity TR, Henry CJ (eds) Principles of route-to-route extrapolation for risk assessment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93-127
225. Young D, Martin T, Venkatapathy R et al (2008) Are the chemical structures in your QSAR correct? QSAR Comb Sci 27: 1337-1345
226. Cronin MTD, Dearden JC, Moss GP et al (1999) Investigation of the mechanism of flux across human skin in vitro by quantitative structure-permeability relationships. Eur J Pharm Sci 7:3250330
227. Hewitt M, Madden JC, Rowe PH, Cronin MTD (2007) Structure-based modelling in reproductive toxicology: (Q)SARs for the placental barrier. SAR QSAR Environ Res 18: 57-76
228. Doniger S, Hofmann T, Yeh J (2002) Predicting CNS permeability of drug molecules: comparison of neural network and support vector machine algorithms. J Comput Biol 9:849-864
229. IUPAC InChI code: www.iupac.orgt.inchi
230. Gedeck P, Rohde B, Bartels C (2006) QSAR-how good is it in practice? Comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets. J Chem Inf Model 46:1924-1936
231. Topliss JG, Costello RJ (1972) Chance correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis. J Med Chem 15:1066-1068
232. Romanelli GP, Cafferata LFR, Castro EA (2000) An improved QSAR study of toxicity of saturated alcohols. J Mol Struct Theochem 504:261-265
233. Yaffe D, Cohen Y, Espinosa G et al (2001) A fuzzy ARTMAP based on quantitative structure- property relationships (QSPRs) for predicting aqueous solubility of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:1177-1207
234. Aptula AO, Jeliazkova NG, Schultz TW et al (2005) The better predictive model: high q2 for the training set or low root mean square error of prediction for the test set? QSAR Comb Sci 24:385-396
235. Eros D, Keri G, Kovesdi I et al (2004) Comparison of predictive ability of water solubility QSPR models generated by MLR, PLS and ANN methods. Mini Rev Med Chem 4:167-177
236. Devillers J, Dore JC (2002) e-Statistics for deriving QSAR models. SAR QSAR Environ Res 13:409-416
237. Scripps Institute: www.scripps.edu/rc/softwaredocs/msi/cerius45/qsar/ working-with- stats.html
238. QSAR World: www.qsarworld.com/statistics. php
239. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:357-369
240. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Muller M et al (2000) On the selection of the training set in environmental QSAR analysis when compounds are clustered. J Chemom 14: 599-616
241. Hemmateenajad B, Javadnia K, Elyasi M (2007) Quantitative structure-retention relationship for the Kovats retention indices of a large set of terpenes: a combined data splitting-feature selection strategy. Anal Chim Acta 592:72-81
242. Cronin MTD (2010) Characterisation, evaluation and possible validation of in silico models for toxicity: determining if a prediction is valid. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, pp 275-300
243. Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK (2003) The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb Sci 22:69-77
244. Benigni R, Bossa C (2008) Predictivity of QSAR. J Chem Inf Model 48:971-980
245. Dearden JC, Hewitt M, Geronikaki AA et al (2009) QSAR investigation of new cognition enhancers. QSAR Comb Sci 28: 1123-1129
246. Johnson SR (2008) The trouble with QSAR (or how I learned to stop worrying and embrace fallacy). J Chem Inf Model 48:25-26
247. Katritzky AR, Kuanar M, Slavov S et al (2010) Quantitative correlation of physical and chemical properties with chemical structure: utility for prediction. Chem Rev 110:5714-5789