Metabolome progression during early gut microbial colonization of gnotobiotic mice

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Marcobal, Angela ^a   Yusufaly, Tahir ^b   Higginbottom, Steven ^a   Snyder, Michael ^a   Sonnenburg, Justin L ^a   Mias, George I ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GERMFREE ANIMAL; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; MICROBIOLOGY; MOUSE; TIME FACTOR;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GERM-FREE LIFE; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; METABOLOME; MICE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84934312516     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep11589     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C. & Wiebe, W. J. Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6578-6583 (1998).
2. Human Microbiome Jumpstart Reference Strains, C. et al. A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome. Science 328, 994-999, doi: 10.1126/science.1183605 (2010).
3. Gevers, D. et al. The Human Microbiome Project: a community resource for the healthy human microbiome. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001377, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001377 (2012).
4. Grice, E. A. & Segre, J. A. The human microbiome: our second genome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 13, 151-170, doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163814 (2012).
5. Human Microbiome Project, C. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486, 215-221, doi: 10.1038/nature11209 (2012).
6. Human Microbiome Project, C. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207-214, doi: 10.1038/nature11234 (2012).
7. Chen, R. et al. Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 148, 1293-1307, doi: 10.1016/j. cell.2012.02.009 (2012).
8. Mias, G. I. & Snyder, M. Personal genomes, quantitative dynamic omics and personalized medicine. Quantitative Biology 1, 71-90 (2013).
9. Schloissnig, S. et al. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493, 45-50, doi: 10.1038/nature11711 (2013).
10. Tralau, T., Sowada, J. & Luch, A. Insights on the human microbiome and its xenobiotic metabolism: what is known about its effects on human physiology? Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 11, 411-425, doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.990437 (2015).
11. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. An obesity-Associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444, 1027-1031, doi: 10.1038/nature05414 (2006).
12. Gophna, U., Sommerfeld, K., Gophna, S., Doolittle, W. F. & Veldhuyzen van Zanten, S. J. Differences between tissue-Associated intestinal microfloras of patients with Crohns disease and ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 4136-4141, doi: 10.1128/ JCM.01004-06 (2006).
13. Nadal, I., Donat, E., Ribes-Koninckx, C., Calabuig, M. & Sanz, Y. Imbalance in the composition of the duodenal microbiota of children with coeliac disease. J. Med. Microbiol. 56, 1669-1674, doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47410-0 (2007).
14. Vrieze, A. et al. The environment within: how gut microbiota may influence metabolism and body composition. Diabetologia 53, 606-613, doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1662-7 (2010).
15. Sonnenburg, E. D. et al. Specificity of polysaccharide use in intestinal bacteroides species determines diet-induced microbiota alterations. Cell 141, 1241-1252, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.005 (2010).
16. Vijay-Kumar, M. et al. Metabolic syndrome and altered gut microbiota in mice lacking Toll-like receptor 5. Science 328, 228-231, doi: 10.1126/science.1179721 (2010).
17. Musso, G., Gambino, R. & Cassader, M. Interactions between gut microbiota and host metabolism predisposing to obesity and diabetes. Annu. Rev. Med. 62, 361-380, doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-012510-175505 (2011).
18. Qin, J. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55-60, doi: 10.1038/ nature11450 (2012).
19. Flint, H. J., Scott, K. P., Louis, P. & Duncan, S. H. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 577-589, doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156 (2012).
20. ElRakaiby, M. et al. Pharmacomicrobiomics: the impact of human microbiome variations on systems pharmacology and personalized therapeutics. OMICS 18, 402-414, doi: 10.1089/omi.2014.0018 (2014).
21. Collins, F. S. & Varmus, H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 793-795, doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523 (2015).
22. Shoaie, S. & Nielsen, J. Elucidating the interactions between the human gut microbiota and its host through metabolic modeling. Front. Genet. 5, 86, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00086 (2014).
23. Palmer, C., Bik, E. M., DiGiulio, D. B., Relman, D. A. & Brown, P. O. Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol. 5, e177, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050177 (2007).
24. Eggesbo, M. et al. Development of gut microbiota in infants not exposed to medical interventions. APMIS 119, 17-35, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02688.x (2011).
25. Weinstock, G. M. Genomic approaches to studying the human microbiota. Nature 489, 250-256, doi: 10.1038/nature11553 (2012).
26. Klaassens, E. S., de Vos, W. M. & Vaughan, E. E. Metaproteomics approach to study the functionality of the microbiota in the human infant gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1388-1392, doi: 10.1128/AEM.01921-06 (2007).
27. Vaishampayan, P. A. et al. Comparative metagenomics and population dynamics of the gut microbiota in mother and infant. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 53-66, doi: 10.1093/gbe/evp057 (2010).
28. Koenig, J. E. et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 Suppl 1, 4578-4585, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000081107 (2011).
29. Adlerberth, I. & Wold, A. E. Establishment of the gut microbiota in Western infants. Acta Paediatr. 98, 229-238, doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01060.x (2009).
30. Ley, R. E., Peterson, D. A. & Gordon, J. I. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell 124, 837-848, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 (2006).
31. De Filippo, C. et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14691-14696, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005963107 (2010).
32. Bjursell, M. K., Martens, E. C. & Gordon, J. I. Functional genomic and metabolic studies of the adaptations of a prominent adult human gut symbiont, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, to the suckling period. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 36269-36279, doi: 10.1074/jbc. M606509200 (2006).
33. Nicholls, A. W., Mortishire-Smith, R. J. & Nicholson, J. K. NMR spectroscopic-based metabonomic studies of urinary metabolite variation in acclimatizing germ-free rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 16, 1395-1404, doi: 10.1021/tx0340293 (2003).
34. Martin, F. P. et al. Dietary modulation of gut functional ecology studied by fecal metabonomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 5284-5295, doi: 10.1021/pr100554m (2010).
35. Lenz, E. M. & Wilson, I. D. Analytical strategies in metabonomics. J. Proteome Res. 6, 443-458, doi: 10.1021/pr0605217 (2007).
36. Want, E. J. et al. Global metabolic profiling procedures for urine using UPLC-MS. Nat. Protoc. 5, 1005-1018, doi: 10.1038/ nprot.2010.50 (2010).
37. Wikoff, W. R. et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3698-3703, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812874106 (2009).
38. Claus, S. P. et al. Systemic multicompartmental effects of the gut microbiome on mouse metabolic phenotypes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 219, doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.56 (2008).
39. Marcobal, A. et al. A metabolomic view of how the human gut microbiota impacts the host metabolome using humanized and gnotobiotic mice. ISME J. 7, 1933-1943, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.89 (2013).
40. El Aidy, S. et al. Temporal and spatial interplay of microbiota and intestinal mucosa drive establishment of immune homeostasis in conventionalized mice. Mucosal Immunol. 5, 567-579, doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.32 (2012).
41. Matsumoto, M. et al. Impact of intestinal microbiota on intestinal luminal metabolome. Sci. Rep. 2, 233, doi: 10.1038/srep00233 (2012).
42. Lee, S. H., An, J. H., Park, H. M. & Jung, B. H. Investigation of endogenous metabolic changes in the urine of pseudo germ-free rats using a metabolomic approach. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life. Sci. 887-888, 8-18, doi: 10.1016/j. jchromb.2011.12.030 (2012).
43. Ley, R. E. et al. Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11070-11075, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504978102 (2005).
44. Yatsunenko, T. et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486, 222-227, doi: 10.1038/nature11053 (2012).
45. Lomb, N. Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data. Astrophys. Space Sci. 39, 447-462 (1976).
46. Scargle, J. D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II-Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J. 263, 835-853 (1982).
47. Scargle, J. D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. III-Fourier transforms, autocorrelation functions, and cross-correlation functions of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J. 343, 874-887 (1989).
48. Hocke, K. Phase estimation with the Lomb-Scargle periodogram method. Ann. Geophys. 16, 356-358 (1998).
49. Van Dongen, H. P., Olofsen, E., VanHartevelt, J. H. & Kruyt, E. W. A procedure of multiple period searching in unequally spaced time-series with the Lomb-Scargle method. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 30, 149-177, doi: 10.1076/brhm.30.2.149.1424 (1999).
50. Schimmel, M. Emphasizing difficulties in the detection of rhythms with Lomb-Scargle periodograms. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 32, 341-345, doi: 10.1076/brhm.32.3.341.1340 (2001).
51. Van Dongen, H. P., Ruf, T., Olofsen, E., VanHartevelt, J. H. & Kruyt, E. W. Analysis of problematic time series with the Lomb-Scargle Method, a reply to emphasizing difficulties in the detection of rhythms with Lomb-Scargle periodograms. Biol. Rhythm. Res. 32, 347-354, doi: 10.1076/brhm.32.3.347.1348 (2001).
52. Glynn, E. F., Chen, J. & Mushegian, A. R. Detecting periodic patterns in unevenly spaced gene expression time series using Lomb-Scargle periodograms. Bioinformatics 22, 310-316, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti789 (2006).
53. Hocke, K. & Kämpfer, N. Gap filling and noise reduction of unevenly sampled data by means of the Lomb-Scargle periodogram. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 4197-4206, doi: 10.5194/acp-9-4197-2009 (2009).
54. Holmes, E., Li, J. V., Athanasiou, T., Ashrafian, H. & Nicholson, J. K. Understanding the role of gut microbiome-host metabolic signal disruption in health and disease. Trends Microbiol. 19, 349-359, doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.05.006 (2011).
55. Tremaroli, V. & Backhed, F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489, 242-249, doi: 10.1038/nature11552 (2012).
56. Sonnenburg, E. D. & Sonnenburg, J. L. Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiotaaccessible carbohydrates. Cell Metab. 20, 779-786, doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.003 (2014).
57. Goodwin, B. L., Ruthven, C. R. & Sandler, M. Gut flora and the origin of some urinary aromatic phenolic compounds. Biochem. Pharmacol. 47, 2294-2297 (1994).
58. Samuel, B. S. & Gordon, J. I. A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host-Archaeal-bacterial mutualism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10011-10016, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602187103 (2006).
59. Mahowald, M. A. et al. Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5859-5864, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901529106 (2009).
60. Shoaie, S. et al. Understanding the interactions between bacteria in the human gut through metabolic modeling. Sci. Rep. 3, 2532, doi: 10.1038/srep02532 (2013).
61. El Aidy, S. et al. Gut bacteria-host metabolic interplay during conventionalisation of the mouse germfree colon. ISME J. 7, 743-755, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.142 (2013).
62. Bouatra, S. et al. The human urine metabolome. PLoS ONE 8, e73076, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073076 (2013).
63. Sonnenburg, J. L., Chen, C. T. & Gordon, J. I. Genomic and metabolic studies of the impact of probiotics on a model gut symbiont and host. PLoS Biol. 4, e413, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040413 (2006).
64. Samuel, B. S. et al. Genomic and metabolic adaptations of Methanobrevibacter smithii to the human gut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10643-10648, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704189104 (2007).
65. Marco, M. L. et al. Convergence in probiotic Lactobacillus gut-Adaptive responses in humans and mice. ISME J. 4, 1481-1484, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.61 (2010).
66. Rey, F. E. et al. Dissecting the in vivo metabolic potential of two human gut acetogens. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 22082-22090, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.117713 (2010).
67. Faith, J. J., McNulty, N. P., Rey, F. E. & Gordon, J. I. Predicting a human gut microbiotas response to diet in gnotobiotic mice. Science 333, 101-104, doi: 10.1126/science.1206025 (2011).
68. Stanberry, L. et al. Integrative analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data from a personal multi-omics profile. Metabolites 3, 741-760 (2013).
69. Wolfram Research, I. Mathematica, Version 9.0. (Wolfram Research, Inc., 2012).
70. Kessner, D., Chambers, M., Burke, R., Agus, D. & Mallick, P. ProteoWizard: open source software for rapid proteomics tools development. Bioinformatics 24, 2534-2536, doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn323 (2008).
71. Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., OMaille, G., Abagyan, R. & Siuzdak, G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem. 78, 779-787, doi: 10.1021/ac051437y (2006).
72. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27-30, doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).
73. Gregory, P. C. Bayesian logical data analysis for the physical sciences: a comparative approach with Mathematica support. (Cambridge Univ Pr, 2005).
74. Ahdesmaki, M., Lahdesmaki, H., Gracey, A., Shmulevich, l. & Yli-Harja, O. Robust regression for periodicity detection in nonuniformly sampled time-course gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 233 (2007).
75. Zhao, W., Agyepong, K., Serpedin, E. & Dougherty, E. R. Detecting Periodic Genes from Irregularly Sampled Gene Expressions: A Comparison Study. EURASIP J. Bioinf. Syst. Biol. 2008, doi: 10.1155/2008/769293 (2008).
76. Yang, R., Zhang, C. & Su, Z. LSPR: an integrated periodicity detection algorithm for unevenly sampled temporal microarray data. Bioinformatics 27, 1023-1025 (2011).