The dorsal attentional system in oculomotor learning of predictive information

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JUL, 2013, Pages

  Tseng, Philip ^a,b   Chang, Chi Fu ^a,b   Chiau, Hui Yen ^a,b   Liang, Wei Kuang ^a,b   Liu, Chia Lun ^a,b   Hsu, Tzu Yu ^a,b   Hung, Daisy L ^a,b   Tzeng, Ovid J L ^a,b   Juan, Chi Hung ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Eye Movements; Predictability; Probability; TMS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Visual Attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; DORSAL ATTENTION NETWORK; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; INFORMATION; LEARNING; OCULOMOTOR SYSTEM; PARIETAL CORTEX; PREDICTION; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SPATIAL LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84933678005     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00404     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Aggleton, J.P., & Brown, M.W. (1999). Episodic memory, amnesia, and thehippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behavioral Brain Science, 22, 425-444.
2. Amador, N., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (2004). Primate antisaccade. II. Supplementary Eye Field neuronal activity predicts correct performance. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1672-1689.
3. Andersen, R.A., Essick, G.K., & Siegel, R.M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230, 456-458.
4. Basso, M.A., & Wurtz, R.H. (1997). Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty. Nature, 389, 66-69.
5. Bichot, N.P., & Schall, J.D. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 4675-4685.
6. Bridgeman, B., & Tseng, P. (2011). Embodied cognitive and the perception-action link. Physics of Life Reviews, 8, 73-85.
7. Brown, M.R., Vilis, T., & Everling, S. (2007). Frontoparietal activation with preparation for antisaccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 1751-1762.
8. Buschman, T.J., Siegel, M., Roy, J.E., & Miller, E.K. (2011) Neural substrates of cognitive capacity limitations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 112252-11255.
9. Campana G., Cowey A, Casco C, Oudsen I, Walsh V. (2007) Left frontal eye field remembers "where" but not "what". Neuropsychologia, 45, 2340-2345.
10. Chambers, C.D., Payne, J.M., Stokes, M.G., & Mattingley, J.B. (2004). Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 217-218.
11. Chao, C.M., Tseng, P., Hsu, T.Y., Su, J.H., Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., Muggleton, N.G., & Juan, C.H. (2011). Predictability of saccadic behaviors is modified by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human posterior parietal cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 1961-1972.
12. Chen, L.L., & Wise, S.P. (1995). Neuronal activity in the Supplementary Eye Field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 1101-1121.
13. Chiau, H.Y., Tseng, P., Su, J.H., Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., Muggleton, N.G., & Juan, C.H. (2011). Trial type probability modulates the cost of antisaccades. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 515-526.
14. Chun, M.M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
15. Chun, M.M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
16. Chun, M.M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 224-234.
17. Chun, M.M., & Phelps, E.A. (1999). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844-847.
18. Cohen, N.J., & Squire, L.R. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210, 207-210.
19. Connolly, J.D., Goodale, M.A., Menon, R.S., Munoz, D.P. (2002). Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1345-1352.
20. Connolly, J.D., Goodale, M.A., Goltz, H.C., & Munoz, D.P. (2005). fMRI activation in the human frontal eye field is correlated with saccadic reaction time. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 605-611.
21. Constantinidis, C., & Steinmetz, M.A. (2005). Posterior parietal cortex automatically encodes the location of salient stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 233-238.
22. Curtis, C.E., & D'Esposito, M. (2003). Success and failure suppressing reflexive behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 409-418.
23. Degonda, N., Mondadori, C.R., Bosshardt, S., Schmidt, C.F., Boesiger, P., Nitsch, R.M., Christoph, Hock., & Katharina, Henke. (2005). Implicit associative learning engages the hippocampus and interacts with explicit associative learning. Neuron, 46, 505-520.
24. Dobbins, I.G., & Sanghoon, H. (2006). Cue-versus probe-dependent prefrontal cortex activity during contextual remembering. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1439-1452.
25. Dorris, M.C., & Glimcher, P.W. (2004). Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective desirability of action. Neuron, 44, 365-378.
26. Dorris, M.C., Pare, M., & Munoz, D.P. (1997). Neuronal activity in monkey superior colliculus related to the initiation of saccadic eye movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 8566-8579.
27. Downar, J., Crawley, A.P., Mikulis, D.J., Davis, K.D. (2001) The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 14, 1256-1267.
28. Duarte, A., Ranganath, C., & Knight, R.T. (2005). Effects of unilateral prefrontal lesions on familiarity, recollection, and source memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8333-8337.
29. Eichenbaum, H. (1999). Conscious awareness, memory and the hippocampus. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 775-776.
30. Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N.J. (1994). Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Science, 17, 449-517.
31. Ellison, A., & Cowey, A. (2006). TMS can reveal contrasting functions of the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 618-625.
32. Ellison, A., Rushworth, M., & Walsh, V. (2003). The parietal cortex in visual search: A visuomotor hypothesis. Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology, 56, 321-330.
33. Everling, S., & Fischer, B. (1998). The antisaccade, a review of basic research and clinical studies. Neuropsychologia, 36, 885-899.
34. Everling, S., Krappmann, P., & Flohr, H. (1997). Cortical potentials preceding proand antisaccades in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 102, 356-362.
35. Everling, S., & Munoz, D.P. (2000). Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 387-400.
36. Farrell, S., Ludwig, C.J., Ellis, L.A., & Gilchrist, I.D. (2009). Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 929-934.
37. Fera, F., Weickert, T.W., Goldberg, T.E., Tessitore, A., Hariri, A., Das, S.,. Venkata, S.M. (2005). Neural mechanisms underlying probabilistic category learning in normal aging. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11340-11348.
38. Fernandez-Duque, D., Grossi, G., Thornton, I.M., & Neville, H.J. (2003). Representation of change: separate electrophysiological markers of attention, awareness, and implicit processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 491-507.
39. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R.N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499-504.
40. Fiser, J., Berkes, P., Orban, G., & Lengyel, M. (2010). Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 119-130.
41. Geng, J.J., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1252-1268.
42. Gottlieb, J.P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M.E. (1998). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481-484.
43. Greene, A.J., Gross, W.L., Elsinger, C.L., & Rao, S.M. (2007). Hippocampal differentiation without recognition: an fMRI analysis of the contextual cueing task. Learning & Memory, 14, 548-553.
44. Hanes, D.P., & Schall, J.D. (1996). Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science, 274, 427-430.
45. Heilman, K.M., & Van Den, Abell, T. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology, 30, 327-330.
46. Hodsoll J., Mevorach C, Humphreys GW (2009). Driven to less dis-traction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 106-114.
47. Juan, C.H., Muggleton, N.G., Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2008). Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2410-2415.
48. Juan, C.H., Shorter-Jacobi, S.M., & Schall, J.D. (2004). Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 15541-15544.
49. Koval, M.J., Ford, K.A., & Everling, S. (2004). Effect of stimulus probability on anti-saccade error rates. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 268-272.
50. Konen, C.S., Kleiser, R., Wittsack, H.J., Bremmer, F., & Seitz, R.J. (2004). The encoding of saccadic eye movements within human posterior parietal cortex. Neuroimage, 22, 304-314.
51. Kristjansson, A. (2007). Saccade landing point selection and the competition account of proand antisaccade generation: the involvement of visual attention-a review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 97-113.
52. Kristjánsson, A., Chen, Y., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1037-1042.
53. Kristjansson, A., Vandenbroucke, M.W., & Driver, J. (2004). When pros become cons for anti-versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types. Experimental Brain Research, 155, 231-244.
54. Kristjánsson, A., Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Macaluso, E., Driver, J. (2007) Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1612-1624.
55. Kunar, M.A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T.S., & Wolfe, J.M. (2007). Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 816-828.
56. Lane, A.R. and Smith, D.T. and Schenk, T. and Ellison, A. (2012) The involvement of posterior parietal cortex and frontal eye fields in spatially primed visual search. Brain Stimulation., 5, 11-17.
57. Liu, C.L., Chiau, H.Y., Tseng, P., Hung, D.L., Tzeng, O.J.L., Muggleton, N.G., & Juan, C.H. (2010). The antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1438-1447.
58. Liu, C.L., Tseng, P., Chiau, H.Y., Liang, W.K., Hung, D.L., Tzeng, O.J.L., Muggleton, N.G., & Juan, C.H. (2011). The location probability effects of saccade reaction times are modulated in the Frontal Eye Fields but not in the Supplementary Eye Field. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1416-1425.
59. Manoach, D.S., Thakkar, K.N., Cain, M.S., Polli, F.E., Edelman, J.A., Fischl, B., & Barton, J.J.S. (2007). Neural activity is modulated by trial history: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1791-1798.
60. McSorley, E., Haggard, P., & Walker, R. (2009). The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition. Vision Research, 49, 608-614.
61. Merriam, E.P., Genovese, C.R., & Colby, C.L. (2003). Spatial updating in human parietal cortex. Neuron, 39, 361-373.
62. Mesulam, M.M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of neurology, 10, 309-325.
63. Mevorach, C., Humphreys, G.W., & Shalev, L. (2006). Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 740-742.
64. Miller, J. (1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 453-471.
65. Morris, A.P., Chambers, C.D., & Mattingley, J.B. (2007). Parietal stimulation destabilizes spatial updating across saccadic eye movements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 9069-9074.
66. Moscovitch, M. (1995). Recovered consciousness: a hypothesis concerning modularity and episodic memory. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 276-290.
67. Muggleton, N.G., Kalla, R., Juan C.H., & Walsh, V. (2011) Dissociating the contributions of human frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex to visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 2891-2896.
68. Munoz, D.P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Review Neuroscience, 5, 218-228.
69. Nakayama, K., Maljkovic, V., & Kristjansson, A. (2004). Short-term memory for the rapid deployment of visual attention. In M.S. Gazzaniga, (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences III. (p. 397-408). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
70. Neider, M.B., & Zelinsky, G.J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research, 46, 614-621.
71. Nobre, A.C., Sebestyen, G.N., Gitelman, D.R., Mesulam, M.M., Frackowiak, R.S., & Frith, C.D. (1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. Brain, 120, 515-533.
72. Nyffeler, T., Rivaud-Pechoux, S., Wattiez, N., & Gaymard, B. (2008). Involvement of the supplementary eye field in oculomotor predictive behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1583-1594.
73. Olk, B., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. Neuroreport, 14, 151-155.
74. Olson, C.R., & Gettner, S.N. (2002). Neuronal activity related to rule and conflict in macaque Supplementary Eye Field. Physiology & Behavior, 77, 663-670.
75. Park, H., Quinlan, J., Thornton, E., & Reder, L.M. (2004). The effect of midazolam on visual search: Implications for understanding amnesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 17879-17883.
76. Peterson, M.S. & Kramer, A.F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
77. Poldrack, R.A., Prabhakaran, V., Seger, C.A., & Gabrieli, J.D.E. (1999). Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. Neuropsychology, 13, 564-574.
78. Reber, A.S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
79. Reber, A.S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 115-119.
80. Roesch, M.R., & Olson, C.R. (2003). Impact of expected reward on neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields and premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 1766-1789.
81. Rushby, J.A., Vercammen, A., Loo, C., Short, B., Weickert, C.S., & Weickert, T.W. (2011). Frontal and parietal contributions to probabilistic association learning. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1879-1888.
82. Sato, T.R., & Schall, J.D. (2003). Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field. Neuron, 38, 637-648.
83. Schall, J.D. (1997). Visuomotor areas of the frontal lobe, in Extrastriatc Cortex of Primates. In: K. Rockland, A. Peters & J. Kaas (Eds.). Cerebral cortex (1st ed., Vol.12, pp. 527-638). New York (NY): Plenum Press.
84. Schall, J.D., Hanes, D.P., Thompson, K.G., & King, D.J. (1995) Saccade target selection in frontal eye field of macaque. I. Visual and premovement activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 6905-6918.
85. Schall, J.D., Morel, A., & Kaas, J.H. (1993). Topography of supplementary eye field afferents to frontal eye field in macaque: implications for mapping between saccade coordinate systems. Visual Neuroscience, 10, 385-393.
86. Schankin, A., & Schubo, A. (2009). Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 46, 668-679.
87. Schenkluhn, B., Ruff, C.C., Heinen, K., & Chambers, C.D. (2008). Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11106-11110.
88. Schlag-Rey, M., Amador, N., Sanchez, H., & Schlag, J. (1997). Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field. Nature, 390, 398-401.
89. Shook, B.L., Schlag-Rey, M., & Schlag, J. (1990). Primate supplementary eye field: I. Comparative aspects of mesencephalic and pontine connections. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 301, 618-642.
90. Squire, L.R., Stark, C.E., & Clark, R.E. (2004). The medial temporal lobe. Annual Review Neuroscience, 27,279-306.
91. Stuphorn, V., Brown, J.W., & Schall, J.D. (2010). Role of supplementary eye field in saccade initiation: executive, not direct, control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 801-816.
92. Stuphorn, V., & Schall, J.D. (2006). Executive control of countermanding saccades by the supplementary eye field. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 925-931.
93. Rushworth, M.F., & Taylor, P.C. (2006) TMS in the parietal cortex: updating representations for attention and action. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2700-2716.
94. Thompson, K.G., Bichot, N.P., & Schall, J.D. (1997) Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. Journal of Neurophysiology 77, 1046-50.
95. Thompson, K.G., Hanes, D.P., Bichot, N.P., & Schall, J.D. (1996) Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology 76, 4040-4055.
96. Todd, J.J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751-754.
97. Todd, J.J., & Marois, R. (2005). Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 144-155.
98. Toth, L.J., & Assad, J.A. (2002). Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex. Nature, 415, 165-168.
99. Tseng, P., Hsu, T.Y., Muggleton, N.G., Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., & Juan, C.H. (2010). Posterior parietal cortex mediates encoding and maintenance processes in change blindness. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1063-1070.
100. Tseng, P., Hsu, T.Y., Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D.L., & Juan, C.H. (2011). Probabilities in implicit learning. Perception, 40, 822-829.
101. Tsubomi, H., Fukuda, K., Watanabe, K., & Vogel, E.K. Neural Limits to Representing Objects Still within View. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 8257-8263.
102. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D.L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
103. Walker, R., McSorley, E., & Haggard, P. (2006). The control of saccade trajectories: Direction of curvature depends on prior knowledge of target location and saccade latency. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 129-138.
104. Weickert, T.W., Goldberg, T.E., Callicott, J.H., Chen, Q., Apud, J.A., Das, S., Venkata S.M. (2009). Neural correlates of probabilistic category learning in patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 1244-1254.
105. Yang, T., & Shadlen, M.N. (2007). Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature, 447, 1075-1080.
106. Yonelinas, A.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517.