Embodied cognition and the perception-action link

Physics of Life Reviews

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 73-85

  Bridgeman, Bruce ^a   Tseng, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHANGE DETECTION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; EMBODIED COGNITION; PERCEPTION-ACTION; PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS; RETINAL IMAGE; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STABLE PLATFORM; VISUAL FUNCTIONS; VISUAL STIMULUS;

ECOLOGY; MUSCLE;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

ANIMAL; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; ECOLOGY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; ECOLOGY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; SACCADES; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79952195383     PISSN: 15710645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2011.01.002     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Abrams R.A., Davoli C.C., Du F., Knapp W.K., Paull D. Altered vision near the hands. Cognition 2008, 107:1035-1047.
2. Allen R.J., Baddeley A.D., Hitch G.J. Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:298-313.
3. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 1995, 5:679-685.
4. Angelone B.L., Levin D.T., Simons D.J. The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures. Perception 2003, 32:947-962.
5. Becker M., Pashler H. Volatile visual representations: failing to detect changes in recently processed information. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2002, 9:744-750.
6. Becker M.W., Pashler H., Anstis S.M. The role of iconic memory in change-detection tasks. Perception 2000, 29:273-286.
7. Blackmore S.J., Brelstaff G., Nelson K., Troscianko T. Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Trans-saccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception 1995, 24:1075-1081.
8. Bridgeman B., Lathrop B. Interactions between cognitive space and motor activity. Spatial processing in navigation, imagery and perception 2007, Springer, Berlin. F. Mast, L. Jänke (Eds.).
9. Bridgeman B. Space constancy 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford. I. Gilchrist (Ed.).
10. Bridgeman B., Hejiden L.V.d., Velichkovsky B. A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1994, 17:247-292.
11. Bridgeman B., Hendry D., Stark L. Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. Vision Research 1975, 15:719-722.
12. Bridgeman B., Kirch M., Sperling A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1981, 29:336-342.
13. Bridgeman B., Mayer M. Failure to integrate visual information from successive fixations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1983, 21:285-286.
14. Bridgeman B., Peery S., Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotormaps of visual space. Perception and Psychophysics 1997, 59:456-469.
15. Bridgeman B., Stark L. Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction. Vision Research 1991, 31:1903-1913.
16. Cardoso-Leite P., Mamassian P., Scuütz-Bosback S., Waszak F. A new look at sensory attenuation: action-effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1740-1745.
17. Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:753-763.
18. Currie C.B., McConkie G.W., Carlson-Radvansky L.A., Irwin D.E. The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62:673-683.
19. Danckert J., Rossetti Y. Blindsight in action: what can the different sub-types of blindsight tell us about the control of visually guided actions?. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Research 2005, 29:1035-1046.
20. Davoli C.C., Abrams R.A. Reaching out with the imagination. Psychological Science 2009, 20:293-295.
21. Deubel H., Schneider W.X. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 1996, 36:1827-1837.
22. Deubel H., Schneider W.X., Bridgeman B. Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement. Vision Research 1996, 36:985-996.
23. Deubel H., Schneider W.X., Bridgeman B. Transsaccadic memory of position and form. Progress in Brain Research 2002, 140:165-180.
24. Di Lollo V. Temporal characteristics of iconic memory. Nature 1977, 267:241-243.
25. di Pellegrino G., Frassinetti F. Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand. Current Biology 2000, 10:1475-1477.
26. Dufour A., Touzalin P. Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 190:91-98.
27. Fernandez-Duque D., Thornton I.M. Change detection without awareness: do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:324-344.
28. Franz V.H., Gegenfurtner K.R., Bülthoff H.H., Fahle M. Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science 2000, 11:20-25.
29. Gibson B.S., Li L., Skow E., Brown K., Cooke L. Searching for one versus two identical targets: when visual search has a memory. Psychological Science 2000, 11:324-327.
30. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems 1966, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
31. Gilchrist I.D., Harvey M. Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology 2000, 10:1209-1212.
32. Hayhoe M., Aivar P., Shrivastavah A., Mruczek R. Visual short-term memory and motor planning. Progress in Brain Research 2002, 140:349-363.
33. Henderson J.M. Identifying objects across saccades: effects of extrafoveal preview and flanker object context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 1992, 18:521-530.
34. Henderson J.M. Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1994, 123:410-426.
35. Henderson J.M. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:498-504.
36. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50:243-271.
37. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics 2003, 65:58-71.
38. Henderson J.M., Hollingworth A. Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science 2003, 14:493-497.
39. Henderson J.M., Siefert A.B. Types and tokens in transsaccadic object identification: effects of spatial position and left-right orientation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:753-760.
40. Hollingworth A. Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:388-403.
41. Hollingworth A. Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:519-537.
42. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:113-136.
43. Hollingworth A., Schrock G., Henderson J.M. Change detection in the flicker paradigm: the role of fixation position within the scene. Memory and Cognition 2001, 29(2):296-304.
44. Ilg U., Bridgeman B., Hoffmann K.-P. Influence of mechanical disturbance on oculomotor behavior. Vision Research 1989, 29:545-551.
45. Irwin D.E., Yantis S., Jonides J. Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics 1983, 34:49-57.
46. Irwin D.E., Zacks J.L., Brown J.S. Visual memory and the perception of a stable visual environment. Perception and Psychophysics 1990, 47:35-46.
47. Irwin D.E., Zelinsky G.J. Eye movements and scene perception: memory for things observed. Perception and Psychophysics 2002, 64:882-895.
48. Johnson J.S., Hollingworth A., Luck S.J. The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:41-55.
49. Jonides J., Irwin D.E., Yantis S. Integrating visual information from successive fixations. Science 1982, 215(4529):192-194.
50. Jonides J., Irwin D.E., Yantis S. Failure to integrate information from successive fixations. Science 1983, 222:188.
51. Lloyd D.M., Azanon E., Poliakoff E. Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space. Brain and Cognition 2010, 73:102-109.
52. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390:279-281.
53. McConkie G.W., Currie C.B. Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:563-581.
54. Melcher D. Persistence of visual memory for scenes. Nature 2001, 412:401.
55. Melcher D. Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision 2006, 6:8-17.
56. Merleau-Ponty M. The visible and the invisible 1968, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
57. Merriam E.P., Genovese C.R., Colby C.L. Spatial updating in human parietal cortex. Neuron 2003, 39:361-373.
58. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
59. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G., Macko K.A. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences 1983, 6:414-417.
60. Morris A.P., Chambers C.D., Mattingley J.B. Parietal stimulation destabilizes spatial updating across saccadic eye movements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007, 104:9069-9074.
61. Nagle M., Bridgeman B., Stark L. Voluntary nystagmus, saccadic suppression, and stabilization of the visual world. Vision Research 1980, 20:1195-1198.
62. Oliva A., Wolfe J.M., Arsenio H.C. Panoramic search: the interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:1132-1146.
63. O'Regan J.K., Levy-Schoen A. Integrating visual information from successive fixations: does trans-saccadic fusion exist?. Vision Research 1983, 23:765-768.
64. O'Regan J.K., Rensink R.A., Clark J.J. Change-blindness as a result of 'mudsplashes'. Nature 1999, 398:34.
65. Paillard J. Cognitive versus sensorimotor encoding of spatial information. Cognitive processes and spatial orientation in animal and man 1987, 43-77. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. P. Ellen, C. Thinus-Blanc (Eds.).
66. Perenin M.T., Rossetti Y. Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field. Neuroreport 1996, 7:793-797.
67. Potter M.C. Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory and Cognition 1993, 21:156-161.
68. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Ehrlich S. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978, 4:529-544.
69. Rayner K., McConkie G.W., Zola D. Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:206-226.
70. Reed C.L., Betz R., Garza J.P., Roberts R.J. Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72:236-245.
71. Reed C.L., Grubb J.D., Steele C. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:166-177.
72. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science 1997, 8:368-373.
73. Rensink R.A. Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology 2002, 53:245-277.
74. Rensink R.A. Visual sensing without seeing. Psychological Science 2004, 15:27-32.
75. Rushworth M.F., Taylor P.C. TMS in the parietal cortex: updating representations for attention and action. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2700-2716.
76. Sampanes A.C., Tseng P., Bridgeman B. The role of gist in scene recognition. Vision Research 2008, 48:2275-2283.
77. Schendel K., Robertson L.C. Reaching out to see: arm position can attenuate human visual loss. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:935-943.
78. Smith D.T., Lane A.R., Schenk T. Arm position does not attenuate visual loss in patients with homonymous field deficits. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:2320-2325.
79. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:644-649.
80. Simons D.J., Rensink R.A. Change blindness: past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:16-20.
81. Standing L. Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 25:207-222.
82. Thiele A., Henning P., Kubischik M., Hoffmann K.P. Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression. Science 2002, 295:2460-2462.
83. Thura D., Boussaoud D., Meunier M. Hand position affects saccadic reaction times in monkeys and humans. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 99:2194-2202.
84. Todd J.J., Marois R. Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature 2004, 428:751-754.
85. Trevarthen C.B. Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychological Research 1968, 31:299-337.
86. Tseng P., Hsu T.Y., Muggleton N.G., Tzeng O.J.L., Hung D.L., Juan C.H. Posterior parietal cortex mediates encoding and maintenance processes in change blindness. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:1063-1070.
87. Tseng P., Tuennermann J., Roker-Knight N., Winter D., Scharlau I., Bridgeman B. Enhancing implicit change detection through action. Perception 2010, 39:1311-1321.
88. Vishton P.M., Rea J.G., Cutting J.E., Nuñez L. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative vs. absolute, not perception vs. action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:1659-1672.
89. Vishton P.M., Sephens N.J., Nelson L.A., Morra S.E., Brunick K.L., Stevens J.A. Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it. Psychological Science 2007, 18:713-719.
90. Wheeler M.E., Treisman A.M. Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2002, 131:48-64.
91. Williams C.C., Henderson J.M., Zacks R.T. Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:816-827.
92. Witt J.K., Proffitt D.R., Epstein W. Perceiving distance: a role of effort and intent. Perception 2004, 33:570-590.
93. Witt J.K., Proffitt D.R., Epstein W. Tool use affects perceived distance but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:880-888.
94. Xu Y., Chun M.M. Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature 2006, 440:91-95.
95. Zelinsky G.J., Loschky L.C. Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:676-690.