Antisaccade cost is modulated by contextual experience of location probability

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1438-1447

  Liu, Chia Lun ^a,b   Chiau, Hui Yan ^a,b   Tseng, Philip ^a,c   Hung, Daisy L ^a,b   Tzeng, Ovid J L ^a,b,d   Muggleton, Neil G ^e   Juan, Chi Hung ^a,b,f  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE OF LINGUISTICS   (Taiwan)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; ENERGY METABOLISM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949712413     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00815.2009     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Amador N, Schlag-Rey M, Schlag J. Primate antisaccades. I. Behavioral characteristics. J Neurophysiol 80: 1775-1786, 1998.
2. Baldauf D, Deubel H. Properties of attentional selection during the preparation of sequential saccades. Exp Brain Res 184: 411-425, 2008.
3. Basso MA, Wurtz RH. Modulation of neuronal activity by target uncertainty. Nature 389: 66-69, 1997.
4. Carpenter RH. Visual selection: neurons that make up their minds. Curr Biol 9: R595-R598, 1999.
5. Carpenter RH, Williams ML. Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377: 59-62, 1995.
6. Chun M, Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cogn Psychol 36: 28-71, 1998.
7. Connolly JD, Goodale MA, Menon RS, Munoz DP. Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set. Nat Neurosci 5: 1345-1352, 2002.
8. Connolly JD, Goodale MA, Goltz HC, Munoz DP. fMRI activation in the human frontal eye field is correlated with saccadic reaction time. J Neurophysiol 94: 605-611, 2005.
9. DeSouza JF, Menon RS, Everling S. Preparatory set associated with prosaccades and anti-saccades in humans investigated with event-related FMRI. J Neurophysiol 89: 1016-1023, 2003.
10. Deubel H, Schneider WX. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res 36: 1827-1837, 1996.
11. Dorris MC, Munoz DP. Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation. J Neurosci 18: 7015-7026, 1998.
12. Everling S, Fischer B. The antisaccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies. Neuropsychologia 36: 885-899, 1998.
13. Everling S, Munoz DP. Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field. J Neurosci 20: 387-400, 2000.
14. Fiser J, Aslin RN. Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychol Sci 12: 499-504, 2001.
15. Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 1030-1044, 1992.
16. Geng JJ, Behrmann M. Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychol Sci 13: 520-525, 2002.
17. Geng JJ, Behrmann M. Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Percept Psychophys 67: 1252-1268, 2005.
18. Geng JJ, Ruff CC, Driver J. Saccades to a remembered location elicit spatially specific activation in the human retinotopic visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 21: 230-245, 2009.
19. Gmeindl L, Rontal A, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Strategic modulation of the fixation-offset effect: dissociable effects of target probability on prosaccades and antisaccades. Exp Brain Res 164: 194-204, 2005.
20. Gold JI, Shadlen MN. The influence of behavioral context on the representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. J Neurosci 23: 632-651, 2003.
21. Gottlieb J, Goldberg ME. Activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey during an antisaccade task. Nat Neurosci 2: 906-912, 1999.
22. Geyer T, Muller HJ, Krummenacher J. Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33: 788-797, 2007.
23. Hallett PE. Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions. Vision Res 18: 1279-1296, 1978.
24. Hoffman JE, Subramaniam B. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57: 787-795, 1995.
25. Hutton SB. Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements. Brain Cogn 68: 327-340, 2008.
26. Juan CH, Muggleton NG, Tzeng OJL, Hung DL, Cowey A, Walsh V. Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields. Cereb Cortex 18: 2410-2415, 2008.
27. Juan CH, Shorter-Jacobi SM, Schall JD. Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 15541-15544, 2004.
28. Koval MJ, Ford KA, Everling S. Effect of stimulus probability on antisaccade error rates. Exp Brain Res 159: 268-272, 2004.
29. Kristjansson A. Saccade landing point selection and the competition account of pro- and antisaccade generation: the involvement of visual attention-a review. Scand J Psychol 48: 97-113, 2007.
30. Kristjansson A. I know what you did on the last trial-a selective review of research on priming in visual search. Front Biosci 13: 1171-1181, 2008.
31. Kristjansson A, Chen Y, Nakayama K. Less attention is more in the preparation of antisaccades, but not prosaccades. Nat Neurosci 4: 1037-1042, 2001.
32. Kristjansson A, Nakayama K. A primitive memory system for the deployment of transient attention. Percept Psychophys 65: 711-724, 2003.
33. Kristjansson A, Vandenbroucke MW, Driver J. When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types. Exp Brain Res 155: 231-244, 2004.
34. Ludwig CJ, Gilchrist ID, McSorley E, Baddeley RJ. The temporal impulse response underlying saccadic decisions. J Neurosci 25: 9907-9912, 2005.
35. Maljkovic V, Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out. II. The role of position. Percept Psychophys 58: 977-991, 1996.
36. Manoach DS, Thakkar KN, Cain MS, Polli FE, Edelman JA, Fischl B, Barton JJ. Neural activity is modulated by trial history: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the effects of a previous antisaccade. J Neurosci 27: 1791-1798, 2007.
37. Miller J. Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14: 453-471, 1988.
38. Milstein DM, Dorris MC. The influence of expected value on saccadic preparation. J Neurosci 27: 4810-4818, 2007.
39. Munoz DP, Everling S. Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 218-228, 2004.
40. Olk B, Kingstone A. Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. Neuroreport 14: 151-155, 2003.
41. Sato TR, Schall JD. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field. Neuron 38: 637-648, 2003.
42. Schall JD. Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 33-42, 2001.
43. Schall JD. On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades. Vision Res 44: 1453-1467, 2004.
44. Schall JD. Frontal eye field. In: Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, edited by Squire LR. Oxford: Academic, 2009, vol. 4, p. 367-374.
45. Schall JD, Hanes DP. Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search. Nature 366: 467-469, 1993.
46. Schall JD, Thompson KG. Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 22: 241-259, 1999.
47. Schiller PH, Kendall J. Temporal factors in target selection with saccadic eye movements. Exp Brain Res 154: 154-159, 2004.
48. Schlag-Rey M, Amador N, Sanchez H, Schlag J. Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field. Nature 390: 398-401, 1997.
49. Stuyven E, Van der Goten K, Vandierendonck A, Claeys K, Crevits L. The effect of cognitive load on saccadic eye movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104: 69-85, 2000.
50. Summerfield C, Egner T. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 403-409, 2009.
51. Walthew C, Gilchrist ID. Target location probability effects in visual search: an effect of sequential dependencies. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 1294-1301, 2006.
52. Wang Q, Cavanagh P, Green M. Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Percept Psychophys 56: 495-500, 1994.