Chapter 33 The parietal cortex in visual search: a visuomotor hypothesis

Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 56, Issue C, 2003, Pages 321-330

  Ellison, Amanda ^a   Rushworth, Matthew ^b   Walsh, Vincent ^c  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957783925     PISSN: 1567424X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70236-3     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allport A. Selection for action: some behavioural and neuroph-syiological considerations of attention and action. In: Heuer H., and Sanders A.F. (Eds). Perspectives on Perception and Action (1987), LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, USA 395-419
2. Arguin M., Cavanagh P., and Joanette Y. Visual feature integration with an attention deficit. Brain and Cognition 24 1 (1994) 44-56
3. Ashbridge E., Walsh V., and Cowey A. Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 35 8 (1997) 1121-1131
4. Assad J., and Toth L.J. Dynamic coding of behaviourally relevant stimuli in parietal cortex. Nature 415 6868 (2002) 165-168
5. Bekkering H., and Neggers S.F.W. Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science 13 4 (2002) 370-374
6. Corbetta M., Miezin F.M., Dobmeyer S., Shulman G.L., and Petersen S.E. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 11 (1991) 1202-1226
7. Desimone R., and Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (1995) 193-222
8. Donner T., Kettermann A., Diesch E., Ostendorf F., Villringer A., and Brandt S.A. Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search. Europ. J. Neurosci. 12 9 (2002) 3407-3414
9. Duncan J., and Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Rev. 96 3 (1989) 433-458
10. Friedman Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., and Treisman A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 269 5225 (1995) 853-855
11. Humphreys G., and Riddoch J. Detection by action: neuropsychological evidence for action-defined templates in search. Nat. Neurosci. 4 1 (2001) 84-88
12. James W. Psychology II (1890/1964), Dover Press, New York
13. Maioli C., Benaglio I., Siri S., Sosta K., and Cappa S. The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: evidence from eye movement recording. Europ. J. Neurosci. 13 2 (2000) 364-372
14. Moran J., and Desimone R. Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229 4715 (1985) 782-784
15. Robertson L.C. What can spatial deficits teach us about feature binding and spatial maps?. Vis. Cog. 6 (1999) 409-430
16. Rushworth M.F., Ellison A., and Walsh V. Complementary localization and lateralization of orienting and motor attention. Nature Neuroscience 4 6 (2001) 656-661
17. Treisman A. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6 2 (1996) 171-178
18. Walsh V., Ashbridge E., and Cowey A. Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologi 36 (1998) 45-49
19. Walsh V., Ellison A., Ashbridge E., and Cowey A. The role of parietal cortex in visual attention-hemispheric asymmetries and the effects of learning: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 37 (1999) 245-251
20. Wocjiulik E., and Kanwisher N. Implicit but not explicit feature binding in a Balint's patient. Vis. Cog. 5 (1998) 157-181
21. Wolfe J. Guided search 2.0: a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1 (1994) 202-238
22. Zhang M., and Barash S. Neuronal switching of sensorimotor transformations for antisaccades. Nature 408 6815 (2000) 971-975