Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2410-2415

  Juan, C H ^a,b   Muggleton, N G ^c   Tzeng, O J L ^b,d   Hung, D L ^a,b,d   Cowey, A ^e   Walsh, V ^c  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d INSTITUTE OF LINGUISTICS   (Taiwan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION; FRONTAL LOBE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 56349125794     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Corbetta M. 1998. Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:831-838.
2. Deubel H, Schneider WX. 1996. Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Res. 36:1827-1837.
3. Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Friston KJ, Mesulam MM. 2002. Functional anatomy of visual search: regional segregations within the frontal eye fields and effective connectivity of the superior colliculus. Neuroimage. 15:970-982.
4. Godijn R, Kramer AF. 2006. Prosaccades and antisaccades to onsets and color singletons: evidence that erroneous prosaccades are not reflexive. Exp Brain Res. 172:439-448.
5. Grosbras MH, Paus T. 2002. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 14:1109-1120.
6. Hunt AR, Kingstone A. 2003a. Covert and overt voluntary attention: linked or independent? Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 18:102-105.
7. Hunt AR, Kingstone A. 2003a. Inhibition of return: dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 29:1068-1074.
8. Juan C-H, Walsh V. 2003. Feedback to V1: a reverse hierarchy in vision. Exp Brain Res. 150:259-263.
9. Juan C-H, Shorter-Jacobi SM, Schall JD. 2004a. Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101: 15541-15544.
10. Juan C-H, Campana G, Walsh V. 2004b. Cortical interactions in vision and awareness: hierarchy in reverse. Prog Brain Res. 144: p. 117-130.
11. Klein R. 1980. Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention?. In: Nickerson R, editor. Attention and performance. Vol.8. New York: Academic Press. p. 259-2760.
12. Klein RM. 2004. On the control of visual orienting. In: Posner M, editor. Cognitive neuroscience of attention. New York: Guilford Press. p. 29-44.
13. Klein RM, Shore DI. 2000. Relations among modes of visual orienting. In: Monsell S, Driver J, editors. Attention and performance XVIII: control of cognitive processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 195-208.
14. Kustov AA, Robinson DL. Shared neural control of attentional shifts and eye movements. Nature. 384: p. 74-77.
15. Muggleton NG, Juan C-H, Cowey A, Walsh V. 2003. Human frontal eye fields and visual search. J Neurophysiol. 89:3340-3343.
16. Olk B, Kingstone A. 2003. Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm. Neuroreport. 14:151-155.
17. O'Shea J, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, Walsh V. 2004. Timing of target discrimination in human frontal eye fields. J Cogn Neurosci. 16:1060-1067.
18. Pascual-Leone A, Walsh V. 2001. Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science. 292: p. 510-512.
19. Priori A, Bertolasi L, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Marsden CD. 1993. Some saccadic eye movements can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortex in man. Brain. 116:355-367.
20. Rizzolatti G. 1983. Mechanisms of selective attention in mammals. In: Ewert J, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ, editors. Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. New York: Plenum Press. p. 261-297.
21. Ro T, Farne A, Chang E. 2002. Locating the human frontal eye fields with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 24:930-940.
22. Sato TR, Schall JD. 2003. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on neural selection in frontal eye field. Neuron. 38:637-648.
23. Schall JD. 2004. On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades. Vision Res. 44:1453-1467.
24. Sheliga BM, Riggio L, Rizzolatti G. 1994. Orienting of attention and eye movements. Exp Brain Res. 98:507-522.
25. Sheliga BM, Riggio L, Rizzolatti G. 1995. Spatial attention and eye movements. Exp Brain Res. 105:261-275.
26. Shepherd M, Findlay JM, Hockey RJ. 1986. The relationship between eye movements and spatial attention. Q J Exp Physiol. 38:475-491.
27. Smith DT, Jackson SR, Rorden C. 2005. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues. Neuropsychologia. 43:1288-1296.
28. Stewart LM, Walsh V, Rothwell JC. 2001. Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study. Neuropsychologia. 39:415-419.
29. Thickbroom GW, Stell R, Mastaglia FL. 1996. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field. J Neurol Sci. 144:114-118.
30. Wasserman EM. 1998. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 108:1-16.