The role of attention in processing morphologically complex spoken words: An EEG/MEG study

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue JAN, 2013, Pages

  Leminen, Alina ^a   Lehtonen, Minna ^a,b   Leminen, Miika ^a,c   Nevalainen, Päivi ^d   Mäkelä, Jyrki P ^d   Kujala, Teija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^d HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Attention; Auditory; Derived; ERP; Inflected; Lexicon; MEG; Morphology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84933671074     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00353     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., and Schröger, E. (2008). Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage 41, 1111-1119.
2. Bertram, R., Laine M., and Karvinen, K. (1999). The interplay of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity in lexical process- ing: evidence from a morphologi- cally rich language. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 28, 213-226.
3. Bölte J., Jansma B. M., Zilverstrand, A., and Zwitserlood P. (2009). Derivational morphology approached with event-related potentials. Ment. Lex. 4, 336-353.
4. Boudelaa, S., Pulvermüller, F., Hauk O., Shtyrov, Y., and Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Arabic morphology in the neural language system. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 998-1010.
5. Bozic M., and Marslen-Wilson W. D. (2010). Neurocognitive context for morphological complexity: dissociating inflection and derivation. Lang. Linguist. Compass 4, 1063-1073.
6. Bozic M., Tyler, L. K., and Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2009). Neuro-cognitive complexity of derivationally complex words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21(Suppl. SS1).
7. Butterworth, B. (1983). "Lexical representation," in Language Production, ed B. Butterworth (London: Academic Press), 257-259.
8. Clahsen, H., Sonnenstuhl, I., and Blevins J. P. (2003). "Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon: a dual mechanism account," in Morphological Structure in Language Processing, eds R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 125-155.
9. Feldman, L. (1994). Beyond orthog- raphy and phonology: differences between inflections and derivations. J. Mem. Lang. 33, 442-470.
10. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., and Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regularly and irregularly morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Mem. Cognit. 13, 255.
11. Frauenfelder, U. H., and Schreuder, R. (1992). "Constraining psycholin- guistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity," in Yearbook of Morphology 1991, eds G. E. Booij and J. Van Marle (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 165-183.
12. Havas, V., Rodriguez-Fornells A., and Clahsen, H. (2012). Brain potentials for derivational morphology: an ERP study of deadjectival nominalizations in Spanish. Brain Lang. 120, 332-344.
13. Hyönä J., Laine M., and Niemi J. (1995). "Effects of a word, morphological complexity on readers' eye fixation patterns," in Eye Movement Research: Mechanisms, Processes, and Applications, eds J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, and R. W. Kentridge (New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing), 444-463.
14. Ille, N., Berg P., and Scherg M. (2002). Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19, 113-124.
15. Janssen, U., Wiese, R., and Schlesewsky M. (2006). Electrophysiological responses to violations of mor- phosyntactic and prosodic features in derived German nouns. J. Neurolinguist. 19, 466-482.
16. Järvikivi J., Bertram, R., and Niemi J. (2006). Affixal salience and the processing of derivational morphology: the role of suffix allomorphy. Lang. Cogn. Process. 21, 394-431.
17. Laine M. (1996). Lexical status of inflectional and derivational suffixes: evidence from Finnish. Scand. J. Psychol. 37, 238-248.
18. Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., and Caramazza, A. (1992). Processing inflectional and derivational morphology. J. Mem. Lang. 31, 348.
19. Lehtonen M., Cunillera, T., Rodríguez Fornells, A., Hultén, A., Tuomainen J., and Laine M. (2007). Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Res. 1148, 123-137.
20. Lehtonen M., and Laine M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in bilinguals and monolinguals. Biling. Lang. Cogn. 6, 213-225.
21. Leinonen, A., Brattico P., Järvenpää M., and Krause, C. M. (2008). Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflec- tional and derivational rules of Finnish. Brain Res. 1218, 181-193.
22. Leinonen, A., Grönholm-Nyman P., Järvenpää M., Söderholm, C., Lappi, O., Laine M., et al. (2009). Neurocognitive processing of auditorily and visually presented inflected words and pseudowords: evidence from a morphologically rich language. Brain Res. 1275, 54-66.
23. Leminen, A., Leminen M., Lehtonen M., Nevalainen P., Ylinen, S., Kimppa, L., et al. (2011). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of spoken inflected and derived words: a com- bined EEG and MEG study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:66. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00066
24. Leminen, A., Leminen M. M., and Krause, C. M. (2010). Time course of the neural processing of spo- ken derived words: an event-related potential study. Neuroreport 21, 948-952.
25. Marslen-Wilson W.D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition 25, 71-102.
26. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2007). "Morphological processes in language comprehension," in The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed M. G. Gaskell (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 175-193.
27. Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional sub- strate for language comprehension. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 823-836.
28. Meunier, F., and Longtin, C.M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 457-471.
29. Morris J., and Holcomb, P. J. (2005). Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 963-981.
30. Niemi J., Laine M., and Tuominen J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: foundations of a new model. Lang. Cogn. Process. 3, 423-446.
31. Palmovic M., and Maricic, A. (2008). Mental lexicon and derivational rules. Coll. Antropol. 32(Suppl. 1), 177-181.
32. Penke M., Weyerts, H., Gross M., Zander, E., Münte, T., and Clahsen, H. (1997). How the brain processes complex words: an event-relatedpotential study of German verb inflections. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 6, 37-52.
33. Perrin, F., Pernier J., Bertrand O., and Echallier J. F. (1989). Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72, 184-187.
34. Pulvermüller, F., and Shtyrov Y. (2006). Language outside the focus of atten- tion: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cogni- tive processes. Prog. Neurobiol. 79, 49-71.
35. Pulvermüller, F., and Shtyrov Y. (2009). Spatiotemporal signatures of large- scale synfire chains for speech pro- cessing as revealed by MEG. Cereb. Cortex 19, 79-88.
36. Rastle, K., and Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthog- raphy. Lang. Cogn. Process. 23, 942-971.
37. Raveh, M., and Rueckl J. G. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: long-term morpho- logical priming in fragment com- pletion and lexical decision. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 103-119.
38. Relander, K., Rämä P., and Kujala, T. (2008). Word semantics is processed even without atten- tional effort. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 1511-1522.
39. Rodríguez-Fornells, A., Clahsen, H., Lleó, C., Zaake, W., and Münte, T. (2001). Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 11, 47-58.
40. Schreuder, R., and Baayen, R. H. (1995). "Modeling morphological processing," in Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, ed L. Feldman (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 131-154.
41. Schriefers, H., Friederici, A., and Graetz P. (1992). Inflectional and derivational morphology in the mental lexicon: symmetries and asymmetries in repetition priming. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 44, 390-390.
42. Shtyrov Y. (2010). Automaticity and attentional control in spoken language processing. Neuropsychological evidence. Ment. Lex. 5, 255-276.
43. Shtyrov Y., Nikulin, V. V., and Pulvermuller, F. (2010). Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning. J. Neurosci. 30, 16864-16867.
44. Shtyrov Y., Pihko, E., and Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Determinants of dom- inance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech? Neuroimage 27, 37-47.
45. Shtyrov Y., and Pulvermuller, F. (2002). Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 1085-1091.
46. Solomyak, O., and Marantz, A. (2010). Evidence for early morphological decomposition in visual word recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2042-2057.
47. Soveri, A., Lehtonen M., and Laine M. (2007). Word frequency and morphological processing in Finnish revisited. Ment. Lex. 2, 359-385.
48. Stanners, R. F., Neiser J. J., Hernon W. P., and Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 18, 399-412.
49. Taft M. (2004). Morphological decom- position and the reverse base frequency effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 57, 745-765.
50. Taft M., and Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav.14, 638-647.
51. Taulu, S., and Simola J. (2006). Spatiotemporal signal space sep- aration method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG mea- surements. Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 1759-1768.
52. Vannest J., Bertram, R., Järvikivi J., and Niemi J. (2002). Counterintuitive cross-linguistic differences: more morphological computation in English than in Finnish. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 31, 83-106.
53. Vartiainen J., Aggujaro, S., Lehtonen M., Hultén, A., Laine M., and Salmelin, R. (2009). Neural dynam- ics of reading morphologically complex words. Neuroimage 47, 2064-2072.
54. Virtanen J., Rinne, T., Ilmoniemi, R. J., and Näätänen, R. (1996). MEG- compatible multichannel EEG electrode array. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 99, 568-570.