Word frequency and morphological processing in finnish revisited

Mental Lexicon

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 359-385

  Soveri, Anna ^a,b   Lehtonen, Minna ^a,b,c   Laine, Matti ^a,b  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Finnish; Lexical access; Lexical decision; Morphological processing; Word frequency

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249155440     PISSN: 18711340     EISSN: 18711375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ml.2.3.04sov     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2007). Storage and computation in the mental lexicon. In G. Jarema & G. Libben (Eds.), The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives (pp. 81-104). The Netherlands: Elsevier.
3. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
4. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 489-511.
5. Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyona, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13-B25.
6. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
7. Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production, Vol. 2 (pp. 257-294). London: Academic Press.
8. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
9. Chialant, D., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Where is morphology and how is it processed? The case of written word recognition. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 55-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Hyona, J., Laine, M., & Niemi, J. (1995). Effects of word’s morphological complexity on reader’s eye fixation patterns. In J. M. Findlay, R. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, Processes and Applications (pp. 445-452). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Hyona, J., Vainio, S., & Laine, M. (2002). A morphological effect obtains for isolated words but not for words in sentence context. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 417-433.
12. Laine, M., & Koivisto, M. (1998). Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision. Psychological Research, 61, 220-229.
13. Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselka-Sallinen, P, Ahlsen, E., & Hyona, J. (1994). A neurolinguistic analysis of morphological deficits in a Finnish-Swedish bilingual aphasic. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 8, 177-200.
14. Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselka-Sallinen, P, & Hyona, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 457-502.
15. Laine, M., Vainio, S., & Hyona, J. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 109-135.
16. Laine, M., & Virtanen, P (1999). WordMill Lexical Search Program. Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku.
17. Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6, 213-225.
18. Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (2006). Recognition of inflected words in a morphologically limited language: frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 121-146.
19. Lehtonen, M., Vorobyev, V. A., Hugdahl, K., Tuokkola, T., & Laine, M. (2006). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 98, 182-193.
20. Lehtonen, M., Cunillera, T., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Hulten, A., Tuomainen, J., & Laine, M. (2007). Recognition of morphologically complex words in Finnish: evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1148, 123-137.
21. New, B., Brysbaert, M, Segui, J., Ferrand, L., & Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 568-585.
22. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 423-446.
23. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
24. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing (pp. 131-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, 25, 425-437.
26. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272.
27. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
28. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57 A, 745-765.
29. Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.