The influence of a reading task on children's eye movements during reading

Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 640-656

  Kaakinen, Johanna K ^a   Lehtola, Annika ^a   Paattilammi, Satu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Children; Expository text; Eye movements; Reading; Task effects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY; OCULOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; WORKING MEMORY; ADULT; BOOK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIRST PASS REINSPECTION DURATION; FORWARD FIRST PASS FIXATION; GROUP DYNAMICS; GROUPS BY AGE; INTEGRATION QUESTION; LOOK BACK DURATION; LOOK BACK FIXATION; PRIMARY SCHOOL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCIENCE; TEXT MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 84933279423     PISSN: 20445911     EISSN: 2044592X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1005623     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4.0: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.999999-4). Retrieved from http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/
2. Blythe, H. I., & Joseph, H. S. S. L. (2011). Children's eye movements during reading. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 643-662). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31-42. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
4. Ellis, N. C., Natsume, M., Stavropoulou, K., Hoxhallari, L., van Daal, V. H. P., Polyzoe, N., ... Petalas, M. (2004). The effects of orthographic depth on learning to read alphabetic, syllabic, and logographic scripts. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 438-468. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.4.5
5. Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553-576. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
6. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retreived from http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion
7. Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Manolitsis, G., Lyytinen, H., & Parrila, R. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading & Writing, 25, 321-346. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9271-x
8. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading & Writing, 2, 127-160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
9. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313-334). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10. Hyönä, J., & Nurminen, A. M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 31-50.
11. Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40, 239-257. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4003-4
12. Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2007). Perspective effects in repeated reading: An eye movement study. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1323-1336. doi:10.3758/BF03193604
13. Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2003). How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye-fixations in expository text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 447-457. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.447
14. Kaakinen, J. K., Olkoniemi, H., Kinnari, T., & Hyönä, J. (2014). Processing of written irony: An eye movement study. Discourse Processes, 51, 287-311. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.870024
15. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Laine, M., & Virtanen, P. (1999). WordMill lexical search program. Turku: Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Turku.
17. Lindeman, J. (1998). Ala-asteen lukutesti ALLU [ALLU test of reading skills for elementary school]. Turku, Finland: Oppimistutkimuksen keskus.
18. Narvaez, D., Van den Broek, P., & Barron-Ruiz, A. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488-496. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.488
19. Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 573-590. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90029-W
20. Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91-121. doi:10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
21. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468. doi:10.1080/01690960344000008
22. Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383. doi:10.1080/10888430701530730
23. Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 91-109. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701-7
24. Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72, 675-688. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3
25. Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289-312. doi:10.1080/10888430701530417
26. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
27. Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
28. R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
29. Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don't believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25, 1218-1226. doi:10.1177/0956797614531148
30. Schumacher, G. M., Moses, J. D., & Young, D. (1983). Students' studying processes on course related texts: The impact of inserted questions. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 15, 19-36.
31. Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859
32. Singer, M. (1990). Answering questions about discourse. Discourse Processes, 13, 261-277. doi:10.1080/01638539009544759
33. Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199-228. doi:10.1080/01638539709545013
34. Smith, B. L., Holliday, W. G., & Austin, H. W. (2010). Students' comprehension of science textbooks using a question-based reading strategy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 363-379. doi:10.1002/tea.20378
35. van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453-456. doi:10.1126/science.1182594
36. van den Broek, P., Tzeng, Y., Risden, K., Trabasso, T., & Basche, P. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects of questioning on narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 521-529. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.521
37. van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. Leon, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. van den Broek, P., White, M. J., Kendeou, P., & Carlson, S. (2009). Reading between the lines. Developmental and individual differences in cognitive processes in reading comprehension. In. K. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, & C. Plythian-Sence (Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension (pp. 107-123). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39. van der Schoot, M., Vasbinder, A. L., Horsley T. M., & Van Lieshout, E. C. D. M. (2008). The role of two reading strategies in text comprehension: An eye fixation study in primary school children. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 203-223. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00354.x
40. Wotschack, C., & Kliegl, R. (2013). Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 548-562. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.625094