Processing of Written Irony: An Eye Movement Study

Discourse Processes

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 287-311

  Kaakinen, Johanna K ^a   Olkoniemi, Henri ^a   Kinnari, Taina ^a   Hyönä, Jukka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899733141     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0163853X.2013.870024     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). Package lme4. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf.
3. Blasko, D. (1999). Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor?Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1675-1683.
4. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
5. Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 172-188.
6. Dai, D. Y., & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 332-347.
7. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
8. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422-433.
9. Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999). Obligatory processing of literal and non-literal meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1579-1599.
10. Dress, M. L., Kreuz, R. J., Link, K. E., & Caucci, G. M. (2008). Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 71-85.
11. Filik, R., & Moxey, L. M. (2010). The on-line processing of written irony. Cognition, 116, 421-436.
12. Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 3-15.
13. Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor & Symbol, 15, 5-27.
14. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Colston, H. L. (2007). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239-264.
16. Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 182-206.
17. Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 919-929.
18. Giora, R., Fein, O., & Schwartz, T. (1998). Irony: Graded salience and indirect negation. Metaphor & Symbol, 13, 83-101.
19. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P.Cole & J.Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J.Hyönä, R.Radach, & H.Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313-334). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
21. Hyönä, J., & Nurminen, A. M. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 31-50.
22. Ivanko, S. L., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). Context incongruity and irony processing. Discourse Processes, 35, 241-279.
23. Ivanko, S. L., Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 244-271.
24. Katz, A., Blasko, D. G., & Kazmerski, V. A. (2004). Saying what you don't mean: Social influences on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 186-189.
25. Kazmerski, V., Blasko, D., & Dessalegn, B. (2003). ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 5, 673-689.
26. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Pexman, P. M. (2008). It's fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 286-290.
28. Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2000). Discourse factors that influence on-line reading of metaphor and irony. Discourse Processes, 29, 201-222.
29. Pierce, R., MacLaren, R., & Chiappe, D. (2010). The role of working memory in the metaphor interference effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 400-404.
30. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
31. Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Obligatory processing of the literal meaning of ironic utterance: Further evidence. Metaphor & Symbol, 15, 47-61.
32. Shamay-Tsoory, S., Tomer, R., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology, 19, 288-300.
33. Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361-366.
34. Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743.
35. Vauras, M., Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (1992). Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: Evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 39-54.
36. Weingartner, K. M., & Klin, C. M. (2005). Perspective-taking during reading: An on-line investigation of the illusory transparency of intention. Memory & Cognition, 333, 48-58.