Temporal trends in hatchery releases of fall-run chinook salmon in California's central valley

San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Huber, Eric R ^a   Carlson, Stephanie M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial propagation; Growth; Life history; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; Phenotypic diversity; Portfolio effect; Sacramento san joaquin delta; San francisco estuary; Stocking

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 84932625451     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15462366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15447/sfews.2015vol13iss2art3     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS. 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318(5847):100-103. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1145621
2. Augerot, X. 2005. Atlas of Pacific salmon. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 161 p.
3. Barnett-Johnson R, Grimes CB, Royer CF, Donohoe CJ. 2007. Identifying the contribution of wild and hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to the ocean fishery using otolith microstructure as natural tags. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1683-1692. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/F07-1
4. Bond N, Lake P. 2003. Local habitat restoration in streams: constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota. Ecol Manag Restor 4(3):193-198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00156.x
5. Brannon EL, Amend DF, Cronin MA, Lannan JE, LaPatra S, McNeil WJ, Noble RE, Smith CE, Talbot AJ, Wedemeyer GA, Westers H. 2004. The controversy about salmon hatcheries. Fisheries 29(9):12-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2004)29[12:TCASH]2.0.CO;2
6. Brown RL. 2006. Nimbus salmon and steelhead hatchery-the first 50 years of Chinook culture with a note on steelhead. Prepared for the Water Forum. Available from: http://www.cahatcheryreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Brown-2006.doc.
7. [California HSRG] California Hatchery Scientific Review Group. 2012. California hatchery review report. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission.
8. Carlson SM, Satterthwaite WH. 2011. Weakened portfolio effect in a collapsed salmon population complex. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:1579-1589. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/F2011-084
9. Chapman DW, Bjornn TC. 1969. Distribution of salmonids in streams. Symposium on Salmon and Trout in Streams. In: Northcote TG, MacMillan HR, editors. Lectures in Fisheries. Vancouver (BC): Institute of Fisheries, University of British Columbia.
10. Cope OB, Slater DW. 1957. Role of Coleman Hatchery in maintaining a king salmon run. Research report 47. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 22 p.
11. Cramer SP. 1991. Contribution of Sacramento basin hatcheries to ocean catch and river escapement of fall Chinook salmon. Sacramento (CA): S.P. Cramer & Associates. Report prepared for the California Department of Water Resources.
12. Dettman DH, Kelley DW, Mitchell WT. 1987. The influence of flow on Central Valley salmon. Newcastle (CA): D.W. Kelley & Associates. Report prepared for the California Department of Water Resources.
13. Doak DF, Bigger D, Harding EK, Marvier MA, O'Malley RE, Thomson D. 1998. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. Am Nat 151(3):264-276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/286117
14. Dittman AH, Quinn TP. 1996. Homing in Pacific salmon: mechanisms and ecological basis. J Exp Biol 199:83-91.
15. [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2014. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2014. Rome (Italy): United Nations.
16. Fisher FW. 1994. Past and present status of Central Valley Chinook salmon. Conserv Biol 8(3):870-873. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030863-5.x
17. Fleming I, Agustsson T, Finstad B, Johnsson J, Björnsson B. 2002. Effects of domestication on growth physiology and endocrinology of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59(8):1323-1330. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/F02-082
18. Fraser DJ. 2008. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids. Evol Appl 1(4):535-586. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00036.x
19. Garza JC, Blankenship SM, Lemaire C, Charrier G. 2008. Genetic population structure of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California's Central Valley. Santa Cruz (CA): Report prepared for the CalFed Research Project "Comprehensive Evaluation of Population Structure and Diversity for Central Valley Chinook Salmon". [Internet]. [cited 2014 Aug 21];16:15. Available from https://swfsc.noaa.gov/publications/FED/01110.pdf
20. Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN. 2007. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21(3):394-407. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01283.x
21. Gustafson RG, Waples RS, Myers JM, Weitkamp LA, Bryant GJ, Johnson OW, Hard JJ. 2007. Pacific salmon extinctions: quantifying lost and remaining diversity. Conserv Biol 21(4):1009-1020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00693.x
22. Hankin DG. 1990. Effects of month of release of hatchery-reared Chinook salmon on size at age, maturation schedule, and fishery contribution. Information report no. 90-94. Portland (OR): Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
23. Healey MC. 1980. Utilization of the Nanaimo River estuary by juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Fish B-NOAA 77:653-668.
24. Healey MC. 1991. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In: Groot C, Margolis L, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. Vancouver (BC): UBC Press.
25. Hilborn R, Quinn TP, Schindler DE, Rogers DE. 2003. Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100(11):6564-6568. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1037274100
26. [HSRG] Hatchery Scientific Review Group. 2004. Hatchery reform: principles and recommendations of the HSRG. Seattle (WA): Puget Sound and Coastal Washington Hatchery Reform Project.
27. [HSRG] Hatchery Scientific Review Group. 2009. Columbia River hatchery reform system-wide report. Seattle (WA): Columbia River Hatchery Reform Project.
28. Jeffres CA, Opperman JJ, Moyle PB. 2008. Ephemeral floodplain habitats provide best growth conditions for juvenile Chinook salmon in a California river. Environ Biol Fish 83(4):449-458. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-008-9367-1
29. [JHRC] Joint Hatchery Review Committee. 2001. Final report on anadromous salmonid fish hatcheries in California. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Fish and Game and National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Region.
30. Johnson G, Sather N, Skalski J, Teel D. 2014. Application of diversity indices to quantify early life-history diversity for Chinook salmon. Ecol Indic 38:170-180. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.005
31. Johnson RC, Weber PK, Wikert JD, Workman ML, MacFarlane RB, Grove MJ, Schmitt AK. 2012. Managed metapopulations: do salmon hatchery "sources" lead to in-river "sinks" in conservation? PloS ONE 7:e28880. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028880
32. Kormos B, Palmer-Zwahlen M, Low A. 2012. Recovery of coded-wire tags from Chinook salmon in California's Central Valley escapement and ocean harvest in 2010. Fisheries Branch administrative report no. 2012-2. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Fish and Game.
33. Laikre L, Schwartz MK, Waples RS, Ryman N. 2010. Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends Ecol Evol 25(9):520-529. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.013
34. Lasko GR, Titus RG, Ferreira JR, Coleman RM. 2014. Straying of late-fall run Chinook salmon from the Coleman National Fish Hatchery into the lower American River, California. California Fish and Game 100(4):665-682. Available from: https://nrm.dfg. ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=99281
35. Lichatowich JA. 2001. Salmon without rivers: a history of the Pacific salmon crisis. Washington (DC): Island Press.
36. Limm MP, Marchetti MP. 2009. Juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) growth in off-channel and main-channel habitats on the Sacramento River, CA using otolith increment widths. Environ Biol Fish 85(2):141-151. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-009-9473-8
37. Lindley ST, Grimes CB, Mohr MS, Peterson W, Stein J, Anderson JT, Botsford LW, Bottom DL, Busack CA, Collier TK, Ferguson J, Garza JC, Grover AM, Hankin DG, Kope RG, Lawson PW, Low A, MacFarlane RB, Moore K, Palmer-Zwahlen M, Schwing FB, Smith J, Tracy C, Webb R, Wells BK, and Williams TH. 2009. What caused the Sacramento River fall Chinook stock collapse? NOAA technical memorandum NMFS no. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-447. Santa Cruz (CA): U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service.
38. Lufkin A, editor. 1991. California's salmon and steelhead: The struggle to restore an imperiled resource. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 288 p.
39. Mahnken C, Ruggerone G, Waknitz W, Flagg T. 1998. A historical perspective on salmonid production from Pacific Rim hatcheries. North Pac Anadromous Fish Comm Bull 1:38-53.
40. Moyle PB. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. 502 p.
41. Myers JM, Kope RG, Bryant GJ, Teel D, Lierheimer LJ, Wainwright TC, Grant WE, Waknitz WF, Neely K, Lindley ST, Waples RS. 1998. Status review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS no. NOAA-NMFS-NWFSC TM-35. Seattle (WA): U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service.
42. Myers RA, Levin SA, Lande R, James FC, Murdoch WW, Paine RT. 2004. Hatcheries and endangered salmon. Science 303(5666):1980. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1095410
43. Naish KA, Taylor JE, Levin PS, Quinn TP, Winton JR, Huppert D, Hilborn R. 2008. An evaluation of the effects of conservation and fishery enhancement hatcheries on wild populations of salmon. Adv Mar Biol 53:61-194. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(07)53002-6
44. Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16:4-21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1991)016<0004:PSATCS>2.0.CO;2
45. Newman KB, Rice J. 2002. Modeling the survival of Chinook salmon smolts outmigrating through the lower Sacramento River system. J Am Stat Assoc 97(460):983-993. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214502388618771
46. [NMFS] National Marine Fisheries Service. 2011. Columbia River Estuary ESA recovery plan module for salmon and steelhead. Seattle (WA): NMFS Northwest Region.
47. [PFMC] Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2014. Appendix B. In: Review of 2013 ocean salmon fisheries: stock assessment and fishery evaluation document for the Pacific Coast salmon fishery management plan. Report prepared for the council and its advisory entities. [cited 2014 Aug 21];15:30. Available from: http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/salsafe2013_appdxb.pdf
48. Palmer-Zwahlen M, Kormos B. 2013. Recovery of coded-wire tags from Chinook salmon in California's Central Valley escapement and ocean harvest in 2011. Fisheries Branch administrative report no. 2013-2. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Fish and Game.
49. Rand PS, Berejikian BA, Bidlack A, Bottom D, Gardner J, Kaeriyama M, Lincoln R, Nagata M, Pearsons TN, Schmidt M. 2012. Ecological interactions between wild and hatchery salmonids and key recommendations for research and management actions in selected regions of the North Pacific. Environ Biol Fish 94(1):343-358. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-012-9988-2
50. Reisenbichler RR, Rubin SP. 1999. Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations. ICES J Mar Sci 56(4):459-466. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0455
51. Roegner GC, Dawley EW, Russell M, Whiting A, Teel DJ. 2010. Juvenile salmonid use of reconnected tidal freshwater wetlands in Grays River, lower Columbia River basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 139(4):1211-1232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/T09-082.1
52. Ruckelshaus MH, Levin P, Johnson JB, Kareiva PM. 2002. The Pacific salmon wars: what science brings to the challenge of recovering species. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 33:665-706. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150504
53. Satterthwaite WH, Carlson SM, Allen-Moran SD, Vincenzi S, Bograd SJ, Wells BK. 2014. Matchmismatch dynamics and the relationship between ocean-entry timing and relative ocean recoveries of Central Valley fall run Chinook salmon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 511: 237-248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps10934
54. Schindler DE, Hilborn R, Chasco B, Boatright CP, Quinn TP, Rogers LA, Webster MS. 2010. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465:609-612. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09060
55. State of California Legislature. 2010. California Fish and Game Code, Section 6902.5. Section 425.11 of the Government Code, relating to fish. Assembly Bill 2063, as amended, Huffman. Fish: Chinook and Coho salmon. Available from: ftp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2051-2100/ab_2063_bill_20100601_amended_sen_v97.html
56. Sholes WH, Hallock RJ. 1979. An evaluation of rearing fall-run Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, to yearlings at Feather River Hatchery, with a comparison of returns from hatchery and downstream releases. Calif Fish Game 65:239-255.
57. Upton HF. 2013. Commercial fishery disaster assistance. Congressional research service report no. RL34209. Washington (D.C.): Congressional Research Service. Available from: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34209.pdf
58. [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982. Report of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on problem no. A-6 of the Central Valley fish and wildlife management study, Coleman National Fish Hatchery and trap. 39 p + appendices. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
59. [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Coleman National Fish Hatchery: station development plan. Portland (OR): U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Engineering, Region 1.
60. Utter F. 2004. Population genetics, conservation and evolution in salmonids and other widely cultured fishes: some perspectives over six decades. Rev Fish Biol Fish 14:125-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11160-004-3768-9
61. Williams JG. 2006. Central Valley salmon: a perspective on Chinook and steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci [Internet]. [cited 2014 July 06];4(3). Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/21v9x1t7 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2006v4iss3art2
62. Williams JG. 2012. Juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in and around the San Francisco Estuary. San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci [Internet]. [cited 2014 June 16];10(3). Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/96f2t9xw doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2012v10iss3art2
63. Williamson KS, May B. 2005. Homogenization of fallrun Chinook salmon gene pools in the Central Valley of California, USA. N Am J Fish Manag 25:993-1009.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/M04-136.1
64. Yoshiyama RM, Fisher FW, Moyle PB. 1998. Historical abundance and decline of Chinook salmon in the Central Valley region of California. N Am J Fish Manag 18:487-521. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1998)018<0487:HAADOC> 2.0.CO;2
65. Schwarzenegger A. 2008. A proclamation by the governor of the state of California, April 10, 2008. Sacramento (CA): Office of the Governor.
66. Schwarzenegger A. 2009. A proclamation of a state of emergency, April 21, 2009. Sacramento (CA): Office of the Governor.