Managed metapopulations: Do salmon hatchery 'sources' lead to in-river 'sinks' in conservation?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Johnson, Rachel C ^a,g   Weber, Peter K ^b   Wikert, John D ^c   Workman, Michelle L ^d,h   MacFarlane, R Bruce ^e   Grove, Marty J ^f,i   Schmitt, Axel K ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c United States Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^d EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT   (United States)

^e SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

^h U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

ⁱ STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER; ISOTOPE; SULFUR; SULFUR 34; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; GROWTH RATE; HATCHERY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; JUVENILE ANIMAL; METAPOPULATION; NATURAL POPULATION; NONHUMAN; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; OTOLITH; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GROWTH; REARING; RIVER; SOURCE SINK DYNAMICS; SPAWNING; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES HABITAT; SURVIVAL; WATERSHED; ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; SALMON;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RIVERS; SALMON; SULFUR ISOTOPES;

EID: 84863025195     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028880     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Hanski I, Simberloff DS, (1997) The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In: Hanksi I, Gilpin ME, editors. Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics and Evolution San Diego Academic Press pp. 5-16.
2. Wiens JA, (1996) Wildlife in Patchy Environments: Metapopulations, mosaics, and management. In: McCullough DR, editors. Metapopulations and Wildlife Conservation Washington, D.C. Island Press.
3. Carr MH, Neigel S, Andelman S, Estes J, Lagier J, et al. (2003) Environmental and ecological differences between terrestrial and marine systems: implications for the objectives and design of protected areas. Ecological Applications 13: 90-107.
4. Carlson SM, Seamons TR, (2008) A review of quantitative genetic components of fitness in salmonids: implications for adaptation to future change. Evolutionary Applications 1: 222-238.
5. Taylor EB, (1991) A review of local adaptation in Salmonidae, with particular reference to Pacific and Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture 98: 185-207.
6. Gilpin M, Hanski I, (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations London Academic Press.
7. Schtickzelle N, Quinn TP, (2007) A metapopulation perspective for salmon and other anadromous fish. Fish and Fisheries 8: 297-314.
8. Dunham JB, Rieman BE, (1999) Metapopulation structure of bull trout: Influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecological Applications 9: 642-655.
9. Cooper AB, Mangel M, (1999) The Dangers of Ignoring Metapopulation Structure for the Conservation of Salmonids. Fishery Bulletin 97: 213-226.
10. Pulliam HR, (1988) Sources, Sinks and Population Regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652-661.
11. Levins R, (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15: 237-240.
12. Brawn JD, Robinson SK, (1996) Source-sink population dynamics may complicate the interpretation of long-term census data. Ecology 77: 3-12.
13. Van Horne B, (1983) Density as a Misleading Indicator of Habitat Quality. Journal of Wildlife Management 47: 893-901.
14. Gowan C, Fausch KD, (1996) Long-Term Demographic Responses of Trout Populations to Habitat Manipulation in Six Colorado Streams. Ecological Applications 6: 931-946.
15. Snyder NFR, Derrickson SR, Bessinger SR, Wiley JW, Smith TB, et al. (1996) Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology 10: 338-348.
16. Mann CC, Plummer ML, (2000) Can science rescue salmon? Science 52: 119-126.
17. Levin PS, Zabel RW, Williams JG, (2001) The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: negative association of fish hatcheries with threatened salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B- Biological Sciences 268: 1153-1158.
18. McClure M, Holmes EE, Sanderson BL, Jordan CE, (2003) A large-scale, multispecies status assessment: anadromous salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Ecological Applications 13: 964-989.
19. Barnett-Johnson R, Grimes CB, Royer CF, Donohoe CJ, (2007) Identifying the contribution of wild and hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to the ocean fishery using otolith microstructure as natural tags. Canadian Journal Of Fisheries And Aquatic Sciences 318: 100.
20. Ruggerone GT, Peterman RM, Dorner B, Myers KW, (2010) Magnitude and trends in abundance of hatchery and wild pink salmon, chum salmon, and sockeye salmon in the North Pacific Ocean Marine and Coastal Fisheries. Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 2: 306-328.
21. Campana SE, Thorrold SR, (2001) Otoliths, Increments, and Elements: Keys to a Comprehensive Understanding of Fish Populations? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 58: 30-38.
22. Walther BD, Thorrold SR, (2006) Water, not food, contributes the majority of strontium and barium deposited in the otoliths of a marine fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311: 125-130.
23. Campana SE, (1999) Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Marine Ecology Progress Series 188: 263-297.
24. Kennedy BP, Folt CL, Blum JD, Chamberlain CP, (1997) Natural isotope markers in salmon. Nature 387: 766-767.
25. Ingram BL, Weber PK, (1999) Salmon origin in California's Sacramento-San Joaquin river system as determined by otolith strontium isotopic composition. Geology 27: 851-854.
26. Barnett-Johnson R, Ramos FC, Pearson T, Grimes CB, MacFarlane RB, (2008) Tracking natal origins of salmon using isotopes, otoliths, and landscape geology. Limnology & Oceanography 53: 1633-1642.
27. Hesslein RH, Hallard KA, RRamal P, (1993) Replacement of sulfur, carbon and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 50: 2071-2076.
28. Fry B, Chumchal MM, (2011) Sulfur stable isotope indicators of residency in estuarine fish. Limnology and Oceanography 56: 1563-1576.
29. Weber PK, Hutcheon ID, McKeegan KD, Ingram BL, (2002) Otolith sulfur isotope method to reconstruct salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) life history. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 59: 587-592.
30. Nriagu JO, Rees CE, Mekhtiyeva VL, Lein AY, Fritz P, et al. (1991) Hydrosphere. In: Krouse HR, Grinenko VA, editors. Stable Isotopes: Natural and Anthropogenic Sulphur in the Environment New York John Wiley & Sons pp. 177-265.
31. Godbout L, Trudel M, Irvine JR, Wood CC, Grove MJ, et al. (2010) Sulfur isotopes in otoliths allow discrimination of anadromous and non-anadromous ecotypes of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Environmental Biology of Fishes 89: 521-532.
32. Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA, (1991) Pacific Salmon at the Crossroads: Stocks at Risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16: 4-21.
33. Barnett-Johnson R, Grimes C, Royer C, Donohoe C, (2007) Identifying the contribution of wild and hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to the ocean fishery using otolith microstructure as natural tags. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 1683-1692.
34. Merz JE, Setka JD, (2004) Evaluation of a spawning habitat enhancement site for Chinook salmon in a regulated California River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24: 397-407.
35. Merz JE, Moyle PB, (2006) Salmon, wildlife, and wine: marine-derived nutrients in human-dominated ecosystems of Central California. Ecological Applications 16: 999-1009.
36. Fisher FW, (1994) Past and present status of Central Valley chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 8: 870-873.
37. Barnett-Johnson R, Ramos FC, Grimes CB, MacFarlane RB, (2005) Validation of Sr isotopes in otoliths by laser ablation multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICPMS): opening avenues in fisheries science applications. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 62: 2425-2430.
38. Krouse HR, Stewart JWB, Grinenko VA, (1991) Pedosphere and biosphere. In: Krouse HR, Grinenko VA, editors. Stable Isotopes: Natural and Anthropogenic Sulphur in the Environment New York John Wiley & Sons pp. 267-306.
39. Ding T, Valkiers S, Kipphardt H, De Bièvre P, Taylor PDP, et al. (2001) Calibrated sulfur isotope abundance ratios of three IAEA sulfur isotope reference materials and V-CDT with a reassessment of the atomic weight of sulfur. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65: 2433-2437.
40. Laplace PS, (1812) Theorie Analytique des Probabilites Paris Courcier.
41. Agresti A, Coull B, (1998) Approximate is better than "Exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions. The American Statistician 52: 119-126.
42. Lewis JR, Sauro J, (2006) When 100% really isn't 100%: Improving the accuracy of small-sample estimates of completion rates. Journal of Usability Studies 1: 136-150.
43. Hill MF, Hastings A, Botsford LW, (2002) The effects of small dispersal rates on extinction times in structured metapopulation models. American Naturalist 160: 389-402.
44. Lindley ST, Schick RS, Mora E, Adams PB, Anderson JJ, et al. (2007) Framework for assessing viability of threatened and endangered Chinook salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Basin. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 5: 26.
45. Moyle PB, (1994) The Decline of Anadromous Fishes in California. Conservation Biology 8: 869-870.
46. Weber ED, Fausch DK, (2003) Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: differences in biology and evidence for competition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 60: 1018-1036.
47. Blanchet S, Paez DJ, Bernatchez L, Dobson JJ, (2008) An integrated comparision of captive-bred and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): Implications for supportive breeding programs. Biological Conservation 141: 1898-1999.
48. McGinnity P, Prodohl P, Ferguson K, Hynes R, O'Maoileidigh N, et al. (2003) Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B- Biological Sciences 270: 2443-2450.
49. Kostow KE, (2004) Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61: 577-589.
50. Ford MJ, (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conservation Biology 16: 815-825.
51. Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS, (2007) Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318: 100.
52. Araki H, Arden WR, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin MS, (2007) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: Evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conservation Biology 21: 181-190.
53. Chilcote MW, Goodson KW, Falcy MR, (2011) Reduced recruitment performance in natural populations of anadromous salmonids associated with hatchery-reared fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 68: 511-522.
54. Lichatocwich J, (1999) Salmon without rivers Washington, D.C. Island Press.
55. Bachman RA, (1984) Foraging behavior of free-ranging wild and hatchery brown trout in a stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113: 1-32.
56. Rhodes JS, Quinn TP, (1999) Comparative performance of genetically similar hatchery and naturally reared juvenile coho salmon in streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19: 670-677.
57. Williams JG, (2006) Central Valley salmon: a perspective on Chinook and steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 4. Available:http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/21v9x1t7.
58. Hendry AP, Wenburg JK, Bentzen P, Volk EC, Quinn TP, (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290: 516-519.