Identifying the contribution of wild and hatchery Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) to the ocean fishery using otolith microstructure as natural tags

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1683-1692

  Barnett Johnson, Rachel ^a,b   Grimes, Churchill B ^a   Royer, Chantell F ^a,c   Donohoe, Christopher J ^a,b  

^a SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; GROWTH RESPONSE; HATCHERY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MICROSTRUCTURE; OTOLITH; PERSISTENCE; SALMONID; WILD POPULATION;

ALASKA; BRITISH COLUMBIA; CALIFORNIA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 48549090427     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F07-129     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Araki, H., Cooper, B., and Blouin, M.S. 2007. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science (Washington, D.C.), 318: 100-103.
2. Bachman, R.A. 1984. Foraging behavior of free-ranging wild and hatchery brown trout in a stream. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 113(1): 1-32.
3. Banks, M.A., Rashbrook, V.K., Calavetta, M.J., Dean, C.A., and Hedgecock, D. 2000. Analysis of microsatellite DNA resolves genetic structure and diversity of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in California's Central Valley. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57(5): 915-927.
4. Barnett-Johnson, R. 2007. Spatial scales of mixing and natal source contributions of salmon populations in the coastal ocean detected by otolith and genetic signatures of origin. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, The University of California - Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, Calif.
5. Berejikian, B.A., Tezak, E.P., Schroder, S.L., Flagg, T.A., and Knudsen, C.M. 1999. Competitive differences between newly emerged offspring of captive-reared and wild coho salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128(5): 832-839.
6. Berg, S., and Jorgensen, J. 1991. Stocking experiments with 0+ and 1+ trout parr, Salmo trutta L., of wild and hatchery origin.1. Post-stocking mortality and smolt yield. J. Fish Biol. 39(2): 151-169.
7. Brannon, E.L., Amend, D.F., Cronin, M.A., Lannan, J.E., LaPatra, S., McNeil, W.J., Nobel, R.E., Smith, C.E., Talbot, A.J., Wedemeyer, G.A., and Westers, H. 2004. The controversy about salmon hatcheries. Fisheries, 29(9): 12-31.
8. California Department of Fish and Game. 2001. Final report on anadromous salmonids fish hatcheries in California. California Department of Fish and Game and the National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Region Joint Hatchery Review Committee. Available from the National Marine Fisheries Service, Santa Cruz Laboratory Library, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA.
9. Campana, S.E., and Casselman, J.M. 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50(5): 1062-1083.
10. Campana, S.E., and Neilson, J.D. 1985. Microstructure of fish otoliths. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42(5): 1014-1032.
11. Cramer, S.P. 1989. Contribution of Sacramento Basin hatcheries to ocean catch and river escapement of fall chinook salmon. Available from S.P. Cramer and Associates, Inc., 300 S.E. Arrow Creek Land, Gresham, OR 97080, USA.
12. DeVries, D.A., Grimes, C.B., and Prager, M.H. 2002. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic stocks of king mackerel. Fish. Res. 57(1): 51-62.
13. Fabrizio, M.C. 2005. Experimental design and sampling strategies for mixed-stock analysis. In Stock identification methods - applications in fishery science. Edited by S.X. Cadrin, K.D. Friedland, and J.R. Waldman. Elsevier Academic Press, San Francisco, Calif. pp. 467-498.
14. Fleming, I.A., and Gross, M.R. 1989. Evolution of adult female life history and morphology in a Pacific salmon (Coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch). Evolution, 43(1): 141-157.
15. Friedland, K.D., and Reddin, D.G. 1994. Use of otolith morphology in stock discriminations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51(1): 91-98.
16. Grimes, C.B. 1998. Marine stock enhancement: sound management or techno-arrogance? Fisheries, 23(9): 18-23.
17. Hilborn, R. 1992. Hatcheries and the future of salmon in the Northwest. Fisheries, 17(1): 5-8.
18. Hilborn, R., and Eggers, D. 2000. A review of hatchery programs for pink salmon in Prince William Sound and Kodiak Island, Alaska. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 129(2): 333-350.
19. Hjort, R.C., and Schreck, C.B. 1982. Phenotypic differences among stocks of hatchery and wild coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, in Oregon, Washington, and California. Fish. Bull. 80(1): 105-119.
20. Koljonen, M.L., Pella, J.J., and Mesuda, M. 2005. Classical individual assignments versus mixture modeling to estimate stock proportions in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) catches from DNA microsatellite data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62(9): 2143-2158.
21. Lichatowich, J. 1999. Salmon without rivers: a history of the Pacific salmon crisis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
22. MacCall, A.D. 1989. Against marine fish hatcheries: ironies of fishery politics in the technological era. CalCOFI Rep. 30: 46-48.
23. Marshall, S.L., and Parker, S.S. 1982. Pattern identification in the microstructure of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) otoliths. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39(4): 542-547.
24. Millar, R.B. 1987. Maximum likelihood estimation of mixed stock fishery composition. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44(3): 583-590.
25. Millar, R.B. 1990. A versatile computer program for mixed-stock fishery composition estimation. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 1753.
26. Myers, J.M., Kope, R.G., Bryant, G.J., Teel, D., Leirheimer, L.J., Wainwright, T.C., Grant, W.S., Waknitz, F.W., Neely, K., Lindley, S.T., and Waples, T.S. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. US Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech Memo. No. NMFS-NWFSC-35.
27. Myers, R.A., Levin, S.A., Lande, R., James, F.C., Murdoch, W.W., and Paine, R.T. 2004. Hatcheries and endangered salmon. Science (Washington, D.C.), 303(5666): 1980.
28. National Research Council (NRC). 1996. Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
29. Neilson, J.D., and Geen, G.H. 1982. Otoliths of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): daily growth increments and factors influencing their production. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39(10): 1340-1347.
30. Olla, B.L., Davis, M.W., and Ryer, C.H. 1998. Understanding how the hatchery environment represses or promotes the development of behavioral survival skills. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62(2): 531-550.
31. Pacific Fishery Management Council. 2004. Review of 2003 ocean salmon fisheries. Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland, OR 97220-1384, USA.
32. Payan, P., De Pontual, H., Edeyer, A., Borelli, G., Boeuf, G., and Mayer-Gostan, N. 2004. Effects of stress on plasma homeostasis, endolymph chemistry, and check formation during otolith growth in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61(7): 1247-1255.
33. Pearcy, W.G. 1997. Salmon production in changing ocean domains. In Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options. Edited by D.J. Strouder, P.A. Bisson, R.J. Naiman, and M.G. Duke. Chapman and Hall, New York. pp. 331-352.
34. Pella, J.J., and Robertson, T.L. 1979. Assessment of composition of stock mixtures. Fish. Bull. (U.S.), 77(2): 387-398.
35. Reinhardt, U.G., Yamamoto, T., and Nakano, S. 2001. Effects of body size and predators on intracohort competition in wild and domesticated juvenile salmon in a stream. Ecol. Res. 16(2): 327-334.
36. Rhodes, J.S., and Quinn, T.P. 1999. Comparative performance of genetically similar hatchery and naturally reared juvenile coho salmon in streams. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 19(3): 670-677.
37. Rybock, J.T., Horton, H.F., and Fessler, J.L. 1975. Use of otoliths to separate juvenile steelhead trout from juvenile rainbow trout. Fish. Bull. (U.S.), 73(3): 654-659.
38. Skoglund, H., and Barlaup, B.T. 2006. Feeding pattern and diet of first feeding brown trout fry under natural conditions. J. Fish Biol. 68(2): 506-521.
39. Smith, N.G., Sullivan, P.J., and Rudstam, L.G. 2006. Using otolith microstructure to determine natal origin of Lake Ontario Chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 135(4): 909-914.
40. Stephens, D.W., and Krebs, J.R. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
41. Sweeting, R.M., Beamish, R.J., and Neville, C.M. 2004. Crystalline otoliths in teleosts: comparisons between hatchery and wild coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the Strait of Georgia. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 14(3): 361-369.
42. Taylor, E.B. 1986. Differences in morphology between wild and hatchery populations of juvenile coho salmon. Prog. Fish. Cult. 48(3): 171-176.
43. Titus, K., Mosher, J.A., and Williams, B.K. 1984. Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant analysis: ecological applications. Am. Midl. Nat. 111(1):1-7.
44. Titus, R.G., Volkoff, M.C., and Snider, W.M. 2004. Use of otolith microstructure to estimate growth rates of juvenile Chinook salmon from a Central Valley, California, stock. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 39: 181-202.
45. Unwin, M.J., and Glova, G.J. 1997. Changes in life history parameters in a naturally spawning population of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) associated with releases of hatchery-reared fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54(6): 1235-1245.
46. Victor, B.C. 1982. Daily otolith increments and recruitment in two coral-reef wrasses, Thalassoma bifasciatum and Halichoeres bivittatus. Mar. Biol. 71(2): 203-208.
47. Weber, P.K., Hutcheon, I.D., McKeegan, K.D., and Ingram, B.L. 2002. Otolith sulfur isotope method to reconstruct salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) life history. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59(4): 587-592.
48. Zhang, Z., Beamish, R.J., and Riddell, B.E. 1995. Differences in otolith microstructure between hatchery-reared and wild chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52(2): 344-352.