Geographic range size is predicted by plant mating system

Ecology Letters

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 706-713

  Grossenbacher, Dena ^a   Briscoe Runquist, Ryan ^a   Goldberg, Emma E ^a   Brandvain, Yaniv ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Baker's law; Outcrossing; Phylogeny; Range size; Selfing

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DATA SET; DIVERGENCE; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; OUTCROSSING; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; POLYPLOIDY; RANGE SIZE; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGY; PLOIDY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SELF FERTILIZATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHY; LINEAR MODELS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; PLANTS; PLOIDIES; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SELF-FERTILIZATION;

EID: 84931572112     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12449     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agosta, S.J., Bernardo, J., Ceballos, G. & Steele, M.A. (2013). A macrophysiological analysis of energetic constraints on geographic range size in mammals. PLoS ONE, 8, e72731.
2. Baker, H.G. (1955). Self compatibility and establishment after long distance dispersal. Evolution, 9, 347-349.
3. Baker, H.G. (1966). The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. The Plumbaginaceae. Evolution, 20, 349-368.
4. Baker, H.G. (1974). The evolution of weeds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 5, 1-24.
5. Barrett, S.C.H., Harder, L.D. & Worley, A.C. (1996). The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 351, 1271-1280.
6. Barringer, B. (2007). Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. Am. J. Bot., 94, 1527-1533.
7. Bell, G. (1982). The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Bierzychudek, P. (1985). Patterns in plant parthenogenesis. Experientia, 41, 1255-1264.
9. Böhning-Gaese, K., Caprano, T., van Ewijk, K. & Veith, M. (2006). Range size: disentangling current traits and phylogenetic and biogeographic factors. Am. Nat., 167, 555-567.
10. Brown, J.H., Stevens, G.C. & Kaufman, D.M. (1996). The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27, 597-623.
11. Cheptou, P. & Massol, F. (2009). Pollination fluctuations drive evolutionary syndromes linking dispersal and mating system. Am. Nat., 174, 46-55.
12. Crawford, K.M. & Whitney, K.D. (2010). Population genetic diversity influences colonization success. Mol. Ecol., 19, 1253-1263.
13. Crawford, D.J., Archibald, J.K., Stoermer, D., Mort, M.E., Kelly, J.K. & Santos-Guerra, A. (2008). A test of Baker's law: breeding systems and the radiation of Tolpis (Asteraceae) in the Canary Islands. Int. J. Plant Sci., 169, 782-791.
14. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London.
15. Gaston, K.J. (2003). The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
16. Glesener, R.R. & Tilman, D. (1978). Sexuality and the components of environmental uncertainty: clues from geographic parthenogenesis in terrestrial animals. Am. Nat., 112, 659-673.
17. Goodwillie, C., Kalisz, S. & Eckert, C.G. (2005). The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 47-79.
18. Griffin, P.C. & Willi, Y. (2014). Evolutionary shifts to self-fertilisation restricted to geographic range margins in North American Arabidopsis lyrata. Ecol. Lett., 17, 484-490.
19. Haag, C.R. & Ebert, D. (2004). A new hypothesis to explain geographic parthenogenesis. Ann. Zool. Fennici, 41, 539-544.
20. Hamrick, J.L. & Godt, M.J.W. (1996). Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci., 351, 1291-1298.
21. Hargreaves, A.L. & Eckert, C.G. (2014). Evolution of dispersal and mating systems along geographic gradients: implications for shifting ranges. Funct. Ecol., 28, 5-21.
22. Heller, R. & Smith, J.M. (1978). Does Muller's ratchet work with selfing? Genet. Res., 32, 289-293.
23. Henslow, G. (1879). On the self-fertilization of plants. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, 1, 317-398.
24. Hörandl, E. (2010). The evolution of self-fertility in apomictic plants. Sex. Plant Reprod., 23, 73-86.
25. Igic, B. & Busch, J.W. (2013). Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? New Phytol., 198, 386-397.
26. Jablonski, D. (1987). Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of cretaceous mollusks. Science, New Series, 238, 360-363.
27. Johnson, M.T.J., Smith, S.D. & Rausher, M.D. (2009). Effects of plant sex on range distributions and allocation to reproduction. New Phytol., 186, 769-779.
28. Johnson, A.L., Govindarajulu, R. & Ashman, T. (2014). Bioclimatic evaluation of geographical range in Fragaria (Rosaceae): consequences of variation in breeding system, ploidy and species age. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 176, 99-114.
29. Jordaens, K., Geenen, S., Reise, H., Van Riel, P., Verhagen, R. & Backeljau, T. (2000). Is there a geographical pattern in the breeding system of a complex of hermaphroditic slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Carinarion)? Heredity (Edinb), 85, 571-579.
30. Kay, K.M., Whittall, J.B. & Hodges, S.A. (2006). A survey of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer substitution rates across angiosperms: an approximate molecular clock with life history effects. BMC Evol. Biol., 6, 36.
31. Lloyd, D.G. (1980). Demographic factors and mating patterns in angiosperms. In: Demogr. Evol. plantPopul. (ed. Solbrig, O.T.). Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 67-88.
32. Lowry, E. & Lester, S.E. (2006). The biogeography of plant reproduction: potential determinants of species' range sizes. J. Biogeogr., 33, 1975-1982.
33. Lynch, M. (1984). Destabilizing hybridization, general-purpose genotypes and geographic parthenogenesis. Q. Rev. Biol., 59, 257-290.
34. Martin, S.L. & Husband, B.C. (2009). Influence of phylogeny and ploidy on species ranges of North American angiosperms. J. Ecol., 97, 913-922.
35. Mittelbach, G.G., Schemske, D.W., Cornell, H.V., Allen, A.P., Brown, J.M., Bush, M.B. et al. (2007). Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol. Lett., 10, 315-331.
36. Pannell, J.R. & Barrett, S.C.H. (1998). Baker's law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution, 52, 657-668.
37. Pigot, A.L., Owens, I.P.F. & Orme, C.D.L. (2012). Speciation and extinction drive the appearance of directional range size evolution in phylogenies and the fossil record. PLoS Biol., 10, e1001260.
38. Pujol, B., Zhou, S.-R., Vilas, J.S. & Pannell, J.R. (2009). Reduced inbreeding depression after species range expansion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 106, 15379-15383.
39. Randle, A., Slyder, J. & Kalisz, S. (2009). Can differences in autonomous selfing ability explain differences in range size among sister-taxa pairs of Collinsia (Plantaginaceae)? An extension of Baker's. New Phytol., 183, 618-629.
40. Robertson, K., Goldberg, E.E. & Igić, B. (2011). Comparative evidence for the correlated evolution of polyploidy and self-compatibility in Solanaceae. Evolution, 65, 139-155.
41. Sexton, J.P., McIntyre, P.J., Angert, A.L. & Rice, K.J. (2009). Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 40, 415-436.
42. Shaw, A.K. & Kokko, H. (2015). Dispersal evolution in the presence of allee effects can speed up or slow down invasions. Am. Nat., 185, 631-639.
43. Sheth, S.N. & Angert, A.L. (2014). The evolution of environmental tolerance and range size: a comparison of geographically restricted and widespread Mimulus. Evolution, 68, 2917-2931.
44. Stebbins, G.L. (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York, London.
45. Stebbins, G.L. (1957). Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Am. Nat., 91, 337-354.
46. Stevens, G.C. (1989). The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. Am. Nat., 133, 240-256.
47. Wright, S.I., Kalisz, S. & Slotte, T. (2013). Evolutionary consequences of self-fertilization in plants. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 280, 20130133.