Reduced inbreeding depression after species range expansion

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 36, 2009, Pages 15379-15383

  Pujol, Benoit ^a,c   Zhou, Shu Rong ^a,b   Vilas, Julia Sanchez ^a   Pannell, John R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c École Nationale de Formation Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

Genetic bottleneck; Mating system; Phenotypic performance; Range margins; Self fertilization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOTTLENECK POPULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERTILIZATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; INCIDENCE; MATING SYSTEM; MIGRATION; NONHUMAN; PLEISTOCENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELFING; SPECIES REFUGE; SPECIES TRANSLOCATION;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; EUPHORBIACEAE; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; MOROCCO; PORTUGAL; SPAIN;

EID: 70349310539     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902257106     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hewitt G (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907-913.
2. Pujol B, Pannell JR (2008) Reduced responses to selection following species range expansion. Science 321:96. (Pubitemid 351956238)
3. Kimura M, Maruyama T, Crow JF (1963) The mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48:1303-1312.
4. Barrett SCH, Charlesworth D (1991) Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352:522-524.
5. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70. (Pubitemid 3035218)
6. Byers DL, Waller DM (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:479-513.
7. Bataillon T, Kirkpatrick M (2000) Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populations: Size does matter. Genet Res 75:75-81. (Pubitemid 30135860)
8. Glemin S (2003) How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57:2678-2687.
9. Crnokrak P, Barrett SCH (2002) Purging the genetic load: A review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358. (Pubitemid 36108550)
10. Barrett SCH (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274-284.
11. Bell G (1982) The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality (Univ of California Press, Berkeley).
12. Peck JR, Yearsley JM, Waxman D (1998) Explaining the geographic distributions of sexual and asexual populations. Nature 391:889-892.
13. Vandel A (1928) "Geographic parthenogenesis: a contribution to the biological and cytological study of natural parthenogenesis" (Translated from French). Bull Biol Belg 62:164-281.
14. Lynch M (1984) Destabilizing hybridization, general-purpose genotypes and geographic parthenogenesis. Q Rev Biol 59:257-290.
15. Haag CR, Ebert D (2004) A new hypothesis to explain geographic parthenogenesis. Ann Zool Fenn 41:539-544.
16. Engelkes T, et al. (2008) Successful range-expanding plants experience less aboveground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature 456:946-948.
17. Glesener RR, Tilman D (1978) Sexuality and components of environmental uncertainty: Clues from geographic parthenogenesis in terrestrial animals. Am Nat 112:659-673.
18. Levin DA (1975) Pest pressure and recombination systems in plants. Am Nat 109:437-457.
19. Antonovics J (1968) Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations: V Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity 23:219-238.
20. Bierzychudek P (1985) Patterns in plant parthenogenesis. Experientia 41:1255-1264.
21. Stebbins GL (1958) Longevity, habitat, and release of genetic variability in the higher plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 23:365-378.
22. Schoen DJ, Morgan MT, Bataillon T (1996) How does self-pollination evolve? Inferences from floral ecology and molecular genetic variation. Philos Trans R Soc London B 351:1281-1290.
23. Lande R, Schemske DW (1985) The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants: I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40. (Pubitemid 16276773)
24. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:273-288.
25. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:47-79. (Pubitemid 43068850)
26. Herlihy CR, Eckert CG (2002) Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416:320-323.
27. Obbard DJ, Harris SA, Pannell JR (2006) Sexual systems and population genetic structure in an annual plant: Testing the metapopulation model. Am Nat 167:354-366.
28. Klinkhamer PGL, de Jong TJ, Metz H (1997) Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol Evol 12:260-265.
29. Charlesworth D, Morgan MT (1991) Allocation of resources to sex functions in flowering plants. Philos Trans R Soc London B 332:91-102.
30. Pannell JR, Dorken ME, Pujol B, Berjano R (2008) Gender variation and transitions between sexual systems in Mercurialis annua (Euphorbiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 169:129-139. (Pubitemid 351230628)
31. Harper JL (1977) Population Biology of Plants (Academic, London).
32. Ibrahim KM, Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1996) Spatial patterns of genetic variation generated by different forms of dispersal during range expansion. Heredity 77:282-291. (Pubitemid 27064080)
33. Obbard DJ, Harris SA, Buggs RJA, Pannell JR (2006) Hybridization, polyploidy, and the evolution of sexual systems in Mercurialis (Euphorbiaceae). Evolution 60:1801-1815.
34. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am Nat 112:975-997.
35. Eppley SM, Pannell JR (2007) Density-dependent self-fertilization and male versus hermaphrodite siring success in an androdioecious plant. Evolution 61:2349-2359.
36. Dorken ME, Pannell JR (2008) Density-dependent regulation of the sex ratio in an annual plant. Am Nat 171:824-830.