Multiple imputation strategies for multiple group structural equation models

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 35-54

  Enders, Craig K ^a   Gottschall, Amanda C ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78651317614     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2011.532695     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bodner, T. E. (2008). What improves with increased missing data imputations? Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 651-675.
4. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation approach. New York: Wiley.
5. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330-351.
6. Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 352-370.
7. Enders, C. K. (2006a). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), A second course in structural equation modeling (pp. 313-344). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
8. Enders, C. K. (2006b). A primer on the use of modern missing data methods in psychosomatic medicine research. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 427-436.
9. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.
10. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430-457.
11. Graham, J. W. (2003). Adding missing-data relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 80-100.
12. Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549-576.
13. Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206-213.
14. Graham, J. W., & Schafer, J. L. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Hancock, G. R., & Lawrence, F. R. (2006). Using latent growth models to evaluate longitudinal change. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 171-196). Greenwood, CT: Information Age.
16. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 49-69.
17. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
18. Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21-39.
19. MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
22. Muthén, B. O. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Muthén, B. O. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
25. Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
26. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys. New York: Wiley.
27. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
28. Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3-15.
29. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
30. Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545-571.
31. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Sinharay, S., Stern, H. S., & Russell, D. (2001). The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. Psychological Methods, 6, 317-329.
33. Tofighi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2007). Identifying the correct number of classes in a growth mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317-341). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34. von Hippel, P. T. (2009). How to impute interactions, squares, and other transformed variables. Sociological Methodology, 39, 265-291.