Classroom assessment: Making space for diversity

Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 249-265

  Cowie, Bronwen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931438428     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52.
2. Aikenhead, G., Orpwood, G., & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 28-44). New York: Routledge.
3. Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008-1026.
4. Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50-73.
5. Bell, B. (2005). Learning in science: The Waikato research experience. London: Routledge.
6. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Bishop, R., & Glynn, T. (1999). Culture counts: Changing power relations in education. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31.
9. Carlone, H., Haun-Frank, J., & Webb, A. (2011). Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth-grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 459-485.
10. Cosgrove, M. (1995). A study in science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 295-310.
11. Cowie, B. (2000). Formative assessment in science classrooms. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Waikato.
12. Cowie, B., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2011). Exploring the value of 'horizontal' learning in early years science classrooms. Early Years, 31(3), 285-295.
13. Cowie, B., Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). The Classroom InSiTE Project: Understanding classroom interactions to enhance teaching and learning in science and technology in Years 1-8. Wellington: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.
14. Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., Glynn, T., Kara, H., Anderson, M., Doyle, J., Parkinson, A., & Te Kiri C. (2011). Culturally responsive pedagogy and assessment in primary science classrooms: Whakamana tamariki. Summary report. Wellington: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative.
15. Driver, D., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
16. Durie, M. (2004). Mauri Ora. Melbourne: Oxford University.
17. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291.
18. Dutro, E., Kazemi, E., Balf, R., & Lin, Y. (2008). "What are you and where are you from?" Race, identity, and the vicissitudes of cultural relevance. Urban Education, 43(3), 269-298.
19. Dweck, C. (2006). The mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
20. Fensham, P. (2009). Real world contexts in PISA Science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884-896.
21. Fleer, M. (1999). Children's alternative views: Alternative to what? International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 119-135.
22. Fleer, M., & Quinones, G. (2009). Assessment of children's technological funds of knowledge as embedded community practices. In A. Jones & M. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 579-597). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
23. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College.
24. Gipps, C., & Murphy, P. (1994). A fair test? Assessment, achievement and equity. Buckingham: Open University.
25. Glynn, T., Cowie, B., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). Quality Teaching Research and Development Science Hub (Waikato): Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Maori students. Report to Ministry of Education. Hamilton: Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, University of Waikato.
26. Glynn, T., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., & Macfarlane, A. (2010). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Connecting New Zealand teachers of science with their Ma¯ori students. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39, 118-127.
27. González, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando el puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge. Journal of Educational Policy, 16(4), 623-641.
28. James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Beyond method: Assessment and learning practices and values. Curriculum Journal, 17(2), 109-138.
29. Kelly, G., & Brown, C. (2003). Communicative demands of learning science through technological design: Third grade students' construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics and Education, 13(4), 483-532.
30. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Education Research Journal, 35, 465-491.
31. Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2010). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy and practice. New York: Teachers College.
32. McKinley, L., & Stewart, G. (2009). Falling into place. Indigenous science education research in the Pacific. In S. Ritchie (Ed.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Australasia (pp. 49-65). Rotterdam: Sense.
33. Ministry of Education. (2007). New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
34. Ministry of Education. (2008). Ka Hikitia-Managing for success: The Mäori education strategy 2008-2012. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
35. Moje, E. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1-44.
36. Moss, P. (2008). Sociocultural implications for assessment I: Classroom assessment. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, E. Haertel, J. Gee, & L. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 222-258). New York: Cambridge University.
37. Moss, P., Pullin, D., Haertel, E., Gee, J., & Young, L. (Eds.). (2008). Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn. New York: Cambridge University.
38. Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland: Heinemann.
39. Osborne, R., & Gilbert, J. (1980). A technique for exploring students' world. Physics Education, 15, 376-379.
40. Parkinson, A., Doyle, J., Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., & Glynn, T. (2011). Engaging wha¯nau with children's science learning. Set: Research Information for Educational Research, 1, 3-9.
41. Pea, R., & Collins, A. (2008). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. Linn, & J. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education: Implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy (pp. 3-12). New York: Teachers College.
42. Shepard, L. (2001). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
43. Southerland, S., Smith, L., Sowell, S., & Kittleson, J. (2007). Resisting unlearning: Understanding science education's response to the United States' national accountability movement. Review of Research in Education, 31, 45-72.
44. Stobart, G. (2005). Fairness in multicultural assessment systems. Assessment in Education, 12(3), 275-287.
45. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.
46. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Maidenhead: Open University.
47. Upadhyay, B. (2009). Teaching science for empowerment in an urban classroom: A case study of a Hmong teacher. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(2), 217-232.
48. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.
49. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University.
50. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1051-1098). Greenwich: Information Age.