A new generalized heterogeneous data model (GHDM) to jointly model mixed types of dependent variables

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 79, Issue , 2015, Pages 50-77

  Bhat, Chandra R ^a,b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Big data analytics; High dimensional data; Latent factors; MACML estimation approach; Mixed dependent variables; Structural equations models

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

DATA ANALYTICS; DEPENDENT VARIABLES; ESTIMATION APPROACHES; HIGH DIMENSIONAL DATA; LATENT FACTOR; STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ESTIMATION METHOD; LOCATION DECISION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84930947283     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aditjandra P.T., Cao X.J., Mulley C. Understanding neighbourhood design impact on travel behaviour: an application of structural equations model to a British metropolitan data. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46(1):22-32.
2. Bartholomew K.J., Ntoumanis N., Ryan R.M., Bosch J.A., Thøgersen-Ntoumani C. Self-determination theory and diminished functioning the role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2011, 37(11):1459-1473.
3. Ben-Akiva M., McFadden D., Train K., Walker J., Bhat C., Bierlaire M., Bunch D.S. Hybrid choice models: progress and challenges. Marketing Letters 2002, 13(3):163-175.
4. Bhat C.R. The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(7):923-939.
5. Bhat C.R. The composite marginal likelihood (CML) inference approach with applications to discrete and mixed dependent variable models. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 2014, 7(1):1-117.
6. Bhat C.R., Dubey S.K. A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B 2014, 67:68-85.
7. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41(5):506-526.
8. Bhat C.R., Sidharthan R. A simulation evaluation of the maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimator for mixed multinomial probit models. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(7):940-953.
9. Bhat C.R., Paleti R., Pendyala R.M., Lorenzini K., Konduri K.C. Accommodating immigration status and self-selection effects in a joint model of household auto ownership and residential location choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2013, 2382(1):142-150.
10. Bhat C.R., Astroza S., Sidharthan R., Jobair Bin Alam M., Khushefati W.H. A joint count-continuous model of travel behavior with selection based on a multinomial probit residential density choice model. Transportation Research Part B 2014, 68:31-51.
11. Bhat C.R., Paleti R., Singh P. A spatial multivariate count model for firm location decisions. Journal of Regional Science 2014, 54(3):462-502.
12. Bolduc D., Ben-Akiva M., Walker J., Michaud A. Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models. Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioral Foundations 2005, 275-302. Elsevier, Oxford. M. Lee-Gosselin, S. Doherty (Eds.).
13. Bollen K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics 1989, John Wiley & Sons.
14. Brownstone D., Golob T.F. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. Journal of Urban Economics 2009, 65(1):91-98.
15. Cao X., Fan Y. Exploring the influences of density on travel behavior using propensity score matching. Environment and Planning-Part B 2012, 39(3):459.
16. Castro M., Eluru N., Bhat C.R., Pendyala R.M. Joint model of participation in nonwork activities and time-of-day choice set formation for workers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2011, 2254:140-150.
17. Castro M., Paleti R., Bhat C.R. A latent variable representation of count data models to accommodate spatial and temporal dependence: application to predicting crash frequency at intersections. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(1):253-272.
18. Clark W.A., Huang Y., Withers S. Does commuting distance matter?: commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2003, 33(2):199-221.
19. Day L.L. Choosing a house: the relationship between dwelling type, perception of privacy and residential satisfaction. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2000, 19(3):265-275.
20. Daziano R.A., Bolduc D. Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 2013, 9(1):74-106.
21. De Leon A.R., Carrière K. General mixed-data model: extension of general location and grouped continuous models. Canadian Journal of Statistics 2007, 35(4):533-548.
22. De Leon A.R., Chough K.C. Analysis of Mixed Data: Methods & Applications 2013, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
23. De Leon A.R., Zhu Y. ANOVA extensions for mixed discrete and continuous data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2008, 52(4):2218-2227.
24. De Leon A., Soo A., Williamson T. Classification with discrete and continuous variables via general mixed-data models. Journal of Applied Statistics 2011, 38(5):1021-1032.
25. Faes C., Geys H., Catalano P. Joint models for continuous and discrete longitudinal data. Longitudinal Data Analysis 2009, 327-348.
26. Feddag M.-L. Composite likelihood estimation for multivariate probit latent traits models. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 2013, 42(14):2551-2566.
27. Gates K.M., Molenaar P., Hillary F.G., Slobounov S. Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. NeuroImage 2011, 54(2):1151-1158.
28. Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and social factors that influence pro environmental concern and behaviour: a review. International Journal of Psychology 2014, 49(3):141-157.
29. Godambe V.P. An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1960, 31(4):1208-1211.
30. Gueorguieva R., Sanacora G. Joint analysis of repeatedly observed continuous and ordinal measures of disease severity. Statistics in Medicine 2006, 25(8):1307-1322.
31. Heckman J.J., Vytlacil E.J. The relationship between treatment parameters within a latent variable framework. Economics Letters 2000, 66(1):33-39.
32. Heckman J., Tobias J.L., Vytlacil E. Four parameters of interest in the evaluation of social programs. Southern Economic Journal 2001, 211-223.
33. Hoshino T., Bentler P.M. Bias in factor score regression and a simple solution. Analysis of Mixed Data: Methods & Applications 2013, 43-61. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. A.R. De Leon, K.C. Chough (Eds.).
34. Jansen S.J. What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2012, 27(3):273-300.
35. Jöreskog K.G. Factor analysis by least squares and maximum likelihood methods. Statistical Methods for Digital Computers 1977, John Wiley & Sons, New York. K. Enslein, A. Ralston, H.S. Wilf (Eds.).
36. Keane M.P. A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 1992, 10(2):193-200.
37. Kim J., Brownstone D. The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and fuel consumption: evidence from national samples. Energy Economics 2013, 40:196-206.
38. Liu X., Vedlitz A., Shi L. Examining the determinants of public environmental concern: evidence from national public surveys. Environmental Science & Policy 2014, 39:77-94.
39. Maddala G. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics 1983, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
40. Mokhtarian P.L., Cao X. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(3):204-228.
41. Munkin M.K., Trivedi P.K. Bayesian analysis of the ordered probit model with endogenous selection. Journal of Econometrics 2008, 143(2):334-348.
42. O'Brien R.M. Identification of simple measurement models with multiple latent variables and correlated errors. Sociological Methodology 1994, 24:137-170.
43. Pace L., Salvan A., Sartori N. Adjusting composite likelihood ratio statistics. Statistica Sinica 2011, 21(1):129.
44. Paleti R., Bhat C.R., Pendyala R.M. Integrated model of residential location, work location, vehicle ownership, and commute tour characteristics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2013, 2382:162-172.
45. Pinjari A.R., Eluru N., Bhat C.R., Pendyala R.M., Spissu E. Joint model of choice of residential neighborhood and bicycle ownership: accounting for self-selection and unobserved heterogeneity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2008, 2082:17-26.
46. Pinjari A.R., Pendyala R.M., Bhat C.R., Waddell P.A. Modeling the choice continuum: an integrated model of residential location, auto ownership, bicycle ownership, and commute tour mode choice decisions. Transportation 2011, 38(6):933-958.
47. Rashidi T.H., Auld J., Mohammadian A.K. A behavioral housing search model: two-stage hazard-based and multinomial logit approach to choice-set formation and location selection. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46(7):1097-1107.
48. Reilly T., O'Brien R.M. Identification of confirmatory factor analysis models of arbitrary complexity the side-by-side rule. Sociological Methods & Research 1996, 24(4):473-491.
49. Schwanen T., Mokhtarian P.L. Attitudes toward travel and land use and choice of residential neighborhood type: evidence from the San Francisco bay area. Housing Policy Debate 2007, 18(1):171-207.
50. Sener I.N., Eluru N., Bhat C.R. An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US. Transportation 2009, 36(5):511-539.
51. Shiftan Y., Outwater M.L., Zhou Y. Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation. Transport Policy 2008, 15(3):186-195.
52. Stapleton D.C. Analyzing political participation data with a MIMIC model. Sociological Methodology 1978, 52-74.
53. Sutton A.J., Abrams K.R., Jones D.R., Sheldon T.A., Song F. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.
54. Teixeira-Pinto A., Harezlak J. Factorization and latent variable models for joint analysis of binary and continuous outcomes. Analysis of Mixed Data: Methods & Applications 2013, 81-91. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. A.R. De Leon, K.C. Chough (Eds.).
55. Temme D., Paulssen M., Dannewald T. Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models - a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software. Business Research 2008, 1(2).
56. Wu B., de Leon A., Withanage N. Joint analysis of mixed discrete and continuous outcomes via copulas. Analysis of Mixed Data: Methods & Applications 2013, 39-156. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. A.R. De Leon, K.C. Chough (Eds.).
57. Zhao Y., Joe H. Composite likelihood estimation in multivariate data analysis. Canadian Journal of Statistics 2005, 33(3):335-356.