Joint model of choice of residential neighborhood and bicycle ownership accounting for self-selection and unobserved heterogeneity

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2082, 2008, Pages 17-26

  Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof ^a   Eluru, Naveen ^a   Bhat, Chandra R ^a   Pendyala, Ram M ^b   Spissu, Erika ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOUSING;

BAY AREAS; CALIFORNIA; JOINT MODELS; NEIGHBOURHOOD; POLICY SIMULATION; RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS; SAN FRANCISCO; SIMULATION ANALYSIS; SOCIODEMOGRAPHICS; UNOBSERVED HETEROGENEITY;

BICYCLES;

EID: 61349084860     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2082-03     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rietveld, P. Biking and Walking: The Position of Non-Motorized Transport Modes in Transport Systems. In Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control (K. J. Button and D. A. Hensher, eds.), Pergamon, London, 2001, pp. 299-319.
2. Cao, X., S. L. Handy, and P. L. Mokhtarian. The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1-20.
3. Chatman, D. G. How the Built Environment Influences Non-Work Travel: Theoretical and Empirical. Essays. PhD dissertation. Department of Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, 2005.
4. Kitamura, R., P. L. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1997, pp. 125-158.
5. Handy, S. L., X. Cao, and P. L. Mokhtarian. Self-Selection in the Relationship Between Built Environment and Walking? Evidence from Northern California. Journal, of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, No. 1, 2006, pp. 55-74.
6. Schwanen, T., and P. L. Mokhtarian. What If You Live in the Wrong Neighborhood? The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type Dissonance on Distance Traveled. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2005, pp. 127-151.
7. Bagley, M. N., and P. L. Mokhtarian. The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behavior: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, pp. 279-297.
8. Baltes, M. R. Factors Influencing Nondiscretionary Work Trips by Bicycle Determined from 1990 U.S. Census Metropolitan Statistical Area Data. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 96-101.
9. Beck, M. J. H., and L. H. Immers. Bicycle Ownership and Use in Amsterdam. In Transportation Research Record .1441, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 141-146.
10. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. Walking, Bicycling, and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Final Summary Report. University of California Transportation Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2003.
11. Ewing, R., W. Schroeer, and W. Greene. School Location and Student Travel: Analysis of Factors Affecting Mode Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1895, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 55-63.
12. Hunt, J. D., and J. E. Abraham. Influences on Bicycle Use. Tixtnsportation, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2007, pp. 453-470.
13. Wigan, M. R. Bicycle Ownership, Use and Exposure: Participation and Activity Patterns in Melbourne, Australia. Transportation Research, Part A, Vol. 18, No. 5-6, 1984, pp. 379-398.
14. Roads and Traffic Authority. Cycling in Sydney: Bicycle Ownership and Use. Transport Data Centre, New South Wales Department of Transport, Sydney, Australia, 2007.
15. Bicycle and Pedestrian Data: Sources, Needs, and Gaps. Report BTS00-02. U.S. Department of Transportation and Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, D.C., 2000.
16. Cervero, R., N. Creedman, M. Pohan, and M., Pai. City CarShare: Assessment of Short-Term Travel-Behavior Impacts. Technical Report. Department of Transportation and Parking, San Francisco, Calif., 2002.
17. Simma, A., and K. W. Axhausen. Structures of Commitment in Mode Use: A Comparison of Switzerland, Germany and Great Britain. Paper STRC 2001. Presented at First Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verità/Ascona, Switzerland, 2001.
18. Pinjari, A. R., R. M. Pendyala, C. R. Bhat, and P. A. Waddell. Modeling Residential Sorting Effects to Understand the Impact of the Built Environment on Commute Mode Choice. Transportation, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2007, pp. 557-573.
19. Pinjari, A. R., C. R. Bhat, and D. A. Hensher. Incorporating Residential Self-Selection Effects in Activity Time-Use Behavior: Formulation and Application of a Joint Mixed Multinomial Logit-Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value Model. Technical paper. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, 2007.
20. Bhat, C. R., and J. Y. Guo. A Comprehensive Analysis of Built Environment Characteristics on Household Residential Choice and Auto Ownership Levels. Transportation Research, Part B, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2007, pp. 506-526.
21. Cao, X., S. L. Handy, and P. L. Mokhtarian. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: Methodologies and Empirical Findings. Presented at 11th International Association for Travel Behavior Research Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
22. Song, Y., and Q. J. Knapp. Measuring Urban Form. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 70, 2004, pp. 210-226.
23. Rodriguez, D. A., R. J. Schneider, and H. M. Young. Easy-to-Compute Index for Identifying Built Environments That Support Walking. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
24. Cervero, R. America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use-Transportation Link. Unwin Hyman, Boston, Mass., 1989.
25. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman, Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity and Design. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199-219.
26. Ewing, R., R. Pendall, and D. Chen. Measuring Sprawl and. Its Impacts. Smart Growth America, Washington, D.C., 2002.
27. Srinivasan, S. Quantifying Spatial Characteristics of Cities. Urban Studies, Vol. 39, 2002, pp. 2005-2028.
28. Bay Area Travel Survey Final Report. MORPACE International, Inc., Farmington Hills, Mich., 2002.
29. Bhat, C. R. Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models Using Randomized and Scrambled Halton Sequences. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 37, No. 9, 2003, pp. 837-855.
30. Wooldridge, J. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2002.