A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 68-85

  Bhat, Chandra R ^a,b   Dubey, Subodh K ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

ICLV models; MACML estimation approach; Multinomial probit

Indexed keywords

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; TRANSPORTATION;

ESTIMATION APPROACHES; INDICATOR VARIABLES; LOG-LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MAXIMUM APPROXIMATE COMPOSITE MARGINAL LIKELIHOODS; MULTINOMIAL PROBIT; SIMULATION APPROACH; SIMULATION EXERCISE; TRAVEL MODE CHOICES;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 84901774810     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.04.011     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alvarez-Daziano R., Bolduc D. Incorporating pro-environmental preferences towards green automobile technologies through a Bayesian hybrid choice model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science 2013, 9(1):74-106.
2. Ashok K., Dillon W.R., Yuan S. Extending discrete choice models to incorporate attitudinal and other latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research 2002, 39(1):31-46.
3. Ben-Akiva M., Walker J., Bernardino A.T., Gopinath D.A., Morikawa T., Polydoropoulou A. Integration of choice and latent variable models. In Perpetual Motion: Travel Behavior Research Opportunities and Application Challenges 2002, 431-470. Pergamon, Elsevier Science. H. Mahmassani (Ed.).
4. Bhat C.R. Endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science 1997, 31(1):34-48.
5. Bhat C.R. Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Research Part A 1998, 32(7):495-507.
6. Bhat C.R. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(7):677-693.
7. Bhat C.R. The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(7):923-939.
8. Bhat, C.R., 2014. The composite marginal likelihood (CML) inference approach with applications to discrete and mixed dependent variable models. Foundations and Trends® in Econometrics (forthcoming).
9. Bhat C.R., Sidharthan R. A simulation evaluation of the maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimator for mixed multinomial probit models. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(7):940-953.
10. Bhat C.R., Sidharthan R. A new approach to specify and estimate non-normally mixed multinomial probit models. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(7):817-833.
11. Bhat C.R., Schofer J.L., Koppelman F.S., Bautch R.C. Driver recruitability for advanced traveler information system experiments. Transportation Research Part C 1993, 1(4):265-274.
12. Bolduc D., Alvarez-Daziano R.A. On estimation of hybrid choice models. Choice Modelling: The State-of-the-Art and the State-of-Practice: Proceedings from the Inaugural International Choice Modelling Conference 2010, Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 259-287. S. Hess, A. Daly (Eds.).
13. Bolduc D., Ben-Akiva M., Walker J., Michaud A. Hybrid choice models with logit kernel: applicability to large scale models. Integrated Land-Use and Transportation Models: Behavioural Foundations 2005, 275-302. Elsevier, Oxford. M. Lee-Gosselin, S. Doherty (Eds.).
14. Cox D.R., Reid N. A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities. Biometrika 2004, 91(3):729-737.
15. Daly A., Hess S., Patruni B., Potoglou D., Rohr C. Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: A study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour. Transportation 2012, 39(2):267-297.
16. Franzese, R.J., Hays, J.C., Schaffer, L., 2010. Spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal autoregressive probit models of binary outcomes: estimation, interpretation, and presentation. APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper, August.
17. Godambe V.P. An optimum property of regular maximum likelihood estimation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1960, 31(4):1208-1211.
18. Johansson M.V., Heldt T., Johansson P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40(6):507-525.
19. Keane M. A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1992, 10(2):193-200.
20. Koppelman F.S., Hauser J.R. Destination choice behavior for non-grocery-shopping trips. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1978, 673:157-165.
21. Lindsay B.G. Composite likelihood methods. Contemporary Mathematics 1988, 80:221-239.
22. Lindsay B.G., Yi G.Y., Sun J. Issues and strategies in the selection of composite likelihoods. Statistica Sinica 2011, 21(1):71-105.
23. McKelvey R.D., Zavoina W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1975, 4(1):103-120.
24. Molenberghs G., Verbeke G. Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data 2005, Springer Series in Statistics. Springer Science + Business Media Inc, New York.
25. Munkin M.K., Trivedi P.K. Bayesian analysis of the ordered probit model with endogenous selection. Journal of Econometrics 2008, 143(2):334-348.
26. Revelt, D., Train, K., 1996. Incentives for appliance efficiency in a competitive energy environment. ACEEE Summer Study Proceedings Paper, Panel 3, Paper 15, August.
27. Stapleton D.C. Analyzing political participation data with a MIMIC Model. Sociological Methodology 1978, 9:52-74.
28. Temme D., Paulssen M., Dannewald T. Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models-a simultaneous estimation approach using SEM software. BuR-Business Research 2008, 1(2):220-237.
29. Varin C., Reid N., Firth D. An overview of composite likelihood methods. Statistica Sinica 2011, 21(1):5-42.
30. Vij, A., Walker, J., 2014. Hybrid choice models: the identification problem. In: Hess, S., Daly, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Choice Modelling. Edward Elgar Publishing (forthcoming).
31. Xu X., Reid N. On the robustness of maximum composite likelihood estimate. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2011, 141(9):3047-3054.
32. Yi G.Y., Zeng L., Cook R.J. A robust pairwise likelihood method for incomplete longitudinal binary data arising in clusters. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 2011, 39(1):34-51.
33. Zhao Y., Joe H. Composite likelihood estimation in multivariate data analysis. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 2005, 33(3):335-356.