Improved water resistance in undecylenic acid (UA)-modified soy protein isolate (SPI)-based adhesives

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 74, Issue , 2015, Pages 577-584

  Liu, Haijing ^a   Li, Cong ^a   Sun, Xiuzhi Susan ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Soy protein adhesive; Undecylenic acid (UA); Water resistance

Indexed keywords

ACID RESISTANCE; ADHESIVES; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CARBON; CHAINS; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; FORMALDEHYDE; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); PARTICLE SIZE; THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS; UREA; UREA FORMALDEHYDE RESINS;

CHEMICAL PATHWAYS; PHENOL FORMALDEHYDE; PROTEIN PARTICLES; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; SOY PROTEIN ADHESIVES; SOY PROTEIN ISOLATES; UNDECYLENIC ACID; WATER-RESISTANCES;

PROTEINS;

ADHESION; CARBON; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; FATTY ACID; FORMALDEHYDE; PARTICLE SIZE; PROTEIN; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOYBEAN; UREA; VISCOSITY; WOOD;

EID: 84930942028     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ASTM International, 2002. Standard Practice for Estimating the Percentage of Wood Failurein Adhesive Bonded Joints. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D5266-99 Vol 15 (06), West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 143.
2. ASTM International, 2002. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D2339-98 Vol 15 (06), West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 158-160.
3. ASTM International, 2002. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D1131-00 Vol 15 (06), West Conshohocken, PA, pp. 67-69.
4. Allaoua A., Wang Z., Xu S. Enzymatic hydrolysis of soy protein isolate and effect of succinylation on the functional properties of resulting protein hydrolysates. Food Res. Int. 1998, 31(9):617-623.
5. Berthier L., Tarjus G. The role of attractive forces in viscous liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134(21).
6. Bunaciu A.A., Fleschin S., Aboul- Enein H.Y. Infrared microspectroscopy applications - review. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2013, 10(1):132-139.
7. Das S.N., Routray M., Nayak P.L. Spectral, thermal, and mechanical properties of furfural and formaldehyde cross-linked soy protein concentrate: a comparative study. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2008, 47(6):576-582.
8. Eaton P., West P. Atomic Force Microscopy 2010, Oxford University Press.
9. Garcia R., Gomez C.J., Martinez N.F., Patil S., Dietz C., Magerle R. Identification of nanoscale dissipation processes by dynamic atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97(1).
10. Grabarek Z., Gergely J. Zero-length crosslinking procedure with the use of active esters. Anal. Biochem. 1990, 185(1):131-135.
11. Hettiarachchy N.S., Kalapathy U., Myers D.J. Alkali-modified soy protein with improved adhesive and hydrophobic properties. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1995, 72(12):1461-1464. http://www.columbiaforestproducts.com/product/purebond-classic-core.
12. Huang W.N., Sun X.Z. Adhesive properties of soy proteins modified by sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2000, 77(7):705-708.
13. Huang W.N., Sun X.Z. Adhesive properties of soy proteins modified by urea and guanidine hydrochloride. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2000, 77(1):101-104.
14. Jackson M., Mantsch H.H. The use and misuse of FTIR spectroscopy in the determination of protein-structure. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995, 30(2):95-120.
15. Kim S., Sessa D.J., Lawton J.W. Characterization of zein modified with a mild cross-linking agent. Ind. Crops Prod. 2004, 20:291-300.
16. Kumar R., Choudhary V., Mishra S., Varma I.K., Mattiason B. Adhesives and plastics based on soy protein products. Ind. Crops Prod. 2002, 16(3):155-172.
17. Lakemond C.M.M., de Jongh H.H.J., Hessing M., Gruppen H., Voragen A.G.J. Soy glycinin: influence of pH and ionic strength on solubility and molecular structure at ambient temperatures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48(6):1985-1990.
18. Liu Y., Li K.C. Modification of soy protein for wood adhesives using mussel protein as a model: the influence of a mercapto group. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2004, 25(21):1835-1838.
19. Mo X.Q., Sun X.Z. Thermal and mechanical properties of plastics molded from sodium dodecyl sulfate-modified soy protein isolates. J. Polym. Environ. 2000, 8(4):161-166.
20. Moore S., Spackman D.H., Stein W.H. Chromatography of amino acids on sulfonated polystyrene resinsan improved system. Anal. Chem. 1958, 30(7):1185-1190.
21. Noy A., Sanders C.H., Vezenov D.V., Wong S.S., Lieber C.M. Chemically-sensitive imaging in tapping mode by chemical force microscopy: relationship between phase lag and adhesion. Langmuir 1998, 14(7):1508-1511.
22. Perlman H.H. Undecylenic acid in psoriasis. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1951, 147(5):525.
23. Qi G., Sun X.S. Peel adhesion properties of modified soy protein adhesive on a glass panel. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010, 32(3):208-212.
24. Qi G., Li N., Wang D., Sun X.S. Physicochemical properties of soy protein adhesives modified by 2-octen-1-ylsuccinic anhydride. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 46:165-172.
25. Sarin V.K., Kent S.B.H., Tam J.P., Merrifield R.B. Quantitative monitoring of solud-phase peptide-synthesis by the ninhydrin reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1981, 117(1):147-157.
26. Schmidt V., Giacomelli C., Soldi V. Thermal stability of films formed by soy protein isolate-sodium dodecyl sulfate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 87(1):25-31.
27. Sehgal D., Vijay I.K. A method for the high efficiency of water-soluble carbodiimide-mediated amidation. Anal. Biochem. 1994, 218:87-91.
28. Zhang Y., Zhu W., Lu Y., Gao Z., Gu J. Water-resistant soybean adhesive for wood binder employing combinations of caustic degradation, nano-modification, and chemical crosslinking. Bioresources 2012, 8(1):1283-1291.
29. van Oss C.J. Long-range and short-range mechanisms of hydrophobic attraction and hydrophilic repulsion in specific and aspecific interactions. J. Mol. Recognit. 2003, 16(4):177-190.