The projected hand illusion: component structure in a community sample and association with demographics, cognition, and psychotic-like experiences

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 207-219

  Graham, Kyran T ^a,b   Martin Iverson, Mathew T ^a,b   Holmes, Nicholas P ^c   Waters, Flavie A ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b GRAYLANDS HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Agency; Embodiment; Principal components analysis; Psychotic like experiences; Rubber hand illusion; Self perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DELUSION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT TERM MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; DELUSIONS; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930793653     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0748-6     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adamo, D., Alexander, N., & Brown, S. (2009). The influence of age and physical activity on upper limb proprioceptive ability. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 17, 272.
2. Albrecht, M., Martin-Iverson, M., Price, G., Lee, J., Iyyalol, R., & Waters, F. (2011). Dexamphetamine effects on separate constructs in the rubber hand illusion test. Psychopharmacology, 217, 39–50. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2255-y
3. Armel, K. C., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, 1499–1506.
4. Arzy, S., Overney, L. S., Landis, T., & Blanke, O. (2006a). Neural mechanisms of embodiment: Asomatognosia due to premotor cortex damage. Archives of Neurology, 63, 1022–1025.
5. Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., & Blanke, O. (2006b). Neural basis of embodiment: Distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8074–8081. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0745-06.2006
6. Asai, T., Mao, Z., Sugimori, E., & Tanno, Y. (2011). Rubber hand illusion, empathy, and schizotypal experiences in terms of self-other representations. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1744–1750. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.005
7. Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551–559.
8. Blanke, O., Landis, T., Spinelli, L., & Seeck, M. (2004). Out‐of‐body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain, 127, 243–258. doi:10.1093/brain/awh040
9. Blanke, O., & Mohr, C. (2005). Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin: Implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness. Brain Research Reviews, 50, 184–199.
10. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
11. Bremner, A. J., Hill, E. L., Pratt, M., Rigato, S., & Spence, C. (2013). Bodily illusions in young children: Developmental change in visual and proprioceptive contributions to perceived hand position. Plos One, 8, e51887. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051887
12. Claridge, G. (1997). Theoretical background and issues. In G. Claridge (Ed.), Schizotypy—Implication for Illness and Health (pp. 3–17). Oxford, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
13. Claridge, G., & Beech, T. (1995). Fully and quasi-dimensional constructions of schizotypy. In A. Raine, T. Lencz, & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Schizotypal personality (pp. 192–216). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press.
14. Coslett, H. B., Saffran, E. M., & Schwoebel, J. (2002). Knowledge of the human body - A distinct semantic domain. Neurology, 59, 357–363.
15. Cowie, D., Makin, T. R., & Bremner, A. J. (2013). Children’s responses to the rubber-hand illusion reveal dissociable pathways in body representation. Psychological Science, 24, 762–769.
16. Cressman, E., Salomonczyk, D., & Henriques, D. P. (2010). Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults. Experimental Brain Research, 205, 533–544. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2392-2
17. Crow, T. (1985). The two-syndrome concept. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 11, 471–486.
18. de Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image–Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48, 669–680.
19. de Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181. doi:10.1080/00273170902794206
20. Dummer, T., Picot-Annand, A., Neal, T., & Moore, C. (2009). Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception, 38, 271–280. doi:10.1068/p5921
21. Egsgaard, L. L., Petrini, L., Christoffersen, G., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2011). Cortical responses to the mirror box illusion: A high-resolution EEG study. Experimental Brain Research, 215, 345–357. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2902-x
22. Ehrsson, H. H. (2009). How many arms make a pair? Perceptual illusion of having an additional limb. Perception, 38, 310–312. doi:10.1068/p6304
23. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An (“E-Prime,”) companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Gentile, G., Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 105, 910–922. doi:10.1152/jn.00840.2010
25. Germine, L., Benson, T. L., Cohen, F., & Hooker, C. I. L. (2013). Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry Research, 207, 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.11.022
26. Goble, D. J., Coxon, J. P., Wenderoth, N., Van Impe, A., & Swinnen, S. P. (2009). Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: Degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 271–278.
27. Gray, N. S., Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (1994). Psychoticism and dopamine D2 binding in the basal ganglia using single photon emission tomography. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 431–434. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90289-5
28. Heed, T., Grundler, M., Rinkleib, J., Rudzik, F. H., Collins, T., Cooke, E., & O'Regan, J. K. (2011). Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect reach-to-grasp actions. Acta Psychologica, 138, 263–271.
29. Holle, H., McLatchie, N., Maurer, S., & Ward, J. (2011). Proprioceptive drift without illusions of ownership for rotated hands in the “rubber hand illusion” paradigm. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 171–178.
30. Holmes, N. P., Snijders, H. J., & Spence, C. (2006). Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 685–701.
31. Ijsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W., & Haans, A. (2006). Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 455–464. doi:10.1162/pres.15.4.455
32. Jablensky, A., McGrath, J., Herrman, H., Castle, D., Gureje, O., Evans, M., & Harvey, C. (2000). Psychotic disorders in urban areas: An overview of the Study on Low Prevalence Disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 221–236.
33. Josse, F. H. J., Le, S., & Mazet, J. (2013). FactoMineR: Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining with R (Version 1.25). Retrieved from http://factominer.free.fr/
34. Kalckert, A., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2012). Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: A dissociation of ownership and agency. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 40.
35. Kammers, M. P. M., Kootker, J. A., Hogendoorn, H., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2010). How many motoric body representations can we grasp? Experimental Brain Research, 202, 203–212. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2124-7
36. Kammers, M. P. M., Longo, M. R., Tsakiris, M., Dijkerman, H. C., & Haggard, P. (2009a). Specificity and coherence of body representations. Perception, 38, 1804–1820. doi:10.1068/p6389
37. Kammers, M. P. M., Verhagen, L., Dijkerman, H. C., Hogendoorn, H., De Vignemont, F., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2009b). Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the Rubber Hand Illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1311–1320.
38. Leube, D. T., Knoblich, G., Erb, M., & Kircher, T. T. J. (2003). Observing one's hand become anarchic: An fMRI study of action identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 597–608.
39. Lezak, M., Howieson, D., Loring, D., Hannay, H., & Fischer, J. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Li, L., Yao, D., & Yin, G. (2009). Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method. Brain Research, 1282, 84–94.
41. Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2009). Sense of agency primes manual motor responses. Perception, 38, 69–78. doi:10.1068/p6045
42. Longo, M. R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M. P., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2008). What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 107, 978–998.
43. Meehl, P. E. (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist, 17, 827–838.
44. Nelson, B., Fornito, A., Harrison, B., Yücel, M., Sass, L., Yung, A., & McGorry, P. (2009). A disturbed sense of self in the psychosis prodrome: Linking phenomenology and neurobiology. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 807–817.
45. Newport, R., Pearce, R., & Preston, C. (2010). Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 385–395. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2104-y
46. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353–359. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00270
47. Peled, A., Pressman, A., Geva, A. B., & Modai, I. (2003). Somatosensory evoked potentials during a rubber-hand illusion in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 64, 157–163. doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(03)00057-4
48. Peled, A., Ritsner, M., Hirschmann, S., Geva, A. B., & Modai, I. (2000). Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 1105–1108.
49. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & the R Development Core Team. (2013). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models (Version R package version 3.1-110).
50. Core Team, R. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2.15.2). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
51. Rohde, M., Di Luca, M., & Ernst, M. O. (2011). The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. Plos One, 6, e21659.
52. Rossetti, Y., Desmurget, M., & Prablanc, C. (1995). Vectorial coding of movement: Vision, proprioception, or both? Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 457–463.
53. Sapnas, K. G., & Zeller, R. A. (2002). Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10, 135–154. doi:10.1891/jnum.10.2.135.52552
54. Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2003). Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29, 427–444.
55. Shimada, S., Fukuda, K., & Hiraki, K. (2009). Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. Plos One, 4, e6185.
56. Shimada, S., Qi, Y., & Hiraki, K. (2010). Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 359–364. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2028-6
57. Sims, A. (1988). Symptoms in the mind: An introduction to descriptive psychopathology (1st ed.). Oxford: Bailliere Tindall.
58. Soliman, A., O'Driscoll, G. A., Pruessner, J., Holahan, A.-L. V., Boileau, I., Gagnon, D., & Dagher, A. (2007). Stress-induced dopamine release in humans at risk of psychosis: A [11C]raclopride PET study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 33, 2033–2041.
59. Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1298–1319. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1298
60. Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2009). Was it me or was it you? How the sense of agency originates from ideomotor learning revealed by fMRI. NeuroImage, 46, 290–298.
61. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Pearson International/5th ed.). Boston/London: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
62. Tajadura-Jiménez, A., Longo, M. R., Coleman, R., & Tsakiris, M. (2012). The person in the mirror: Using the enfacement illusion to investigate the experiential structure of self-identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1725–1738. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.004
63. Thakkar, K. N., Nichols, H. S., McIntosh, L. G., & Park, S. (2011). Disturbances in body ownership in schizophrenia: Evidence from the rubber hand illusion and case study of a spontaneous out-of-body experience. Plos One, 6, e27089. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027089
64. Tipper, S. P., Lloyd, D., Shorland, B., Dancer, C., Howard, L. A., & McGlone, F. (1998). Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. Neuroreport, 9, 1741–1744. doi:10.1097/00001756-199806010-00013
65. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 31, 80–91. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80
66. Tsakiris, M., Longo, M. R., & Haggard, P. (2010). Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2740–2749.
67. Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., & Haggard, P. (2006). Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 423–432. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004
68. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231–251.
69. Waters, F. A. V., & Badcock, J. C. (2010). First-rank symptoms in schizophrenia: Reexamining mechanisms of self-recognition. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36, 510–517. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn112