Quantifying the Triple Helix relationship in scientific research: Statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries

Quality and Quantity

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1381-1396

  Choi, Sujin ^a   Yang, Joshua Sung Woo ^b   Park, Han Woo ^c  

^a Kookmin University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^c Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Developed and developing countries; Global divide; Innovation; Scientific collaboration; Triple Helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930753430     PISSN: 00335177     EISSN: 15737845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0052-5     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amir, S., Nugroho, Y.: Beyond the triple helix: framing STS in the developmental context. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. (2013). doi:10.1177/0270467613509603
2. Chen, W., Wellman, B.: The global digital divide—within and between countries. IT Soc. 1(7), 39–45 (2004)
3. Chilote, R.: Dependency: a critical synthesis of the literature. Latin Am. Perspect. 1(1), 4–29 (1974)
4. Choi, S., Park, H.W.: Flow of online content from production to consumption in the context of globalization theory. Globalizations 11(2), 171–187 (2014)
5. Choi, S., Yang, J.S.W., Park, H.W.: The triple helix and international collaboration in science. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2014). doi:10.1002/asi.23165
6. Etzkowitz, H.: The triple helix: science, technology and the entrepreneurial spirit. J. Knowl. Based Innov. China 3(2), 76–90 (2011)
7. Etzkowitz, H.: Can a teaching university be an entrepreneurial university? Civic entrepreneurship and the formation of a cultural cluster in Ashland, Oregon. CIMR Research Working Paper Series. CA: Centre for Innovation Management Research (2013)
8. Etzkowitz, H., Dzisah, J.: Rethinking development: circulation in the triple helix. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 20(6), 653–666 (2008)
9. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Rev. 14(1), 11–19 (1995)
10. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., Terra, B.R.C.: The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res. Policy 29(2), 313–330 (2000)
11. Eun, J.H., Lee, K., Wu, G.: Explaining the “University-run enterprises” in China: a theoretical framework for university–industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Res. Policy 35(9), 1329–1346 (2006)
12. Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., Hoekman, J.: Spatial scientometrics: towards a cumulative research program. J. Inf. 3, 222–232 (2009)
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M.: The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London (1994)
14. Glänzel, W., Schlemmer, B.: National research profiles in a changing Europe (1983–2003): an exploratory study of sectoral characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics 70(2), 267–275 (2007)
15. Jiang, K.: International Sstudent flows between Asia, Australia, and Russia: a network analysis. J. Contemp. Eastern Asia 13(1), 83–98 (2014). http://eastasia.yu.ac.kr/Ke_13_1.pdf
16. Khan, G.F., Park, H.W.: Measuring the triple helix on the web: longitudinal trends in the university–industry–government relationship in Korea. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 62(12), 2443–2455 (2011)
17. Khan, G.F., Park, H.W.: The e-government research domain: a triple helix network analysis of collaboration at the regional, country, and institutional levels. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(2), 182–193 (2013)
18. Kim, H., Huang, M., Jin, F., Bodoff, D., Moon, J., Choe, Y.C.: Triple helix in the agricultural sector of Northeast Asian countries: a comparative study between Korea and China. Scientometrics 90(1), 101–120 (2012)
19. Krippendorff, K.: Information of interactions in complex systems. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 38(6), 669–680 (2009)
20. Leydesdorff, L.: The mutual information of university–industry–government relations: an indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics 58(2), 445–467 (2003)
21. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H.: The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Sci. Public Policy 25(3), 195–203 (1998)
22. Leydesdorff, L., Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: university–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 60(4), 778–788 (2009)
23. Leydesdorff, L., Ivanova, I.A.: Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems: steps toward a calculus of processing meaning. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(2), 386–399 (2014)
24. Mehta, M.D.: Nanoscience and nanotechnology: assessing the nature of innovation in these fields. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 22(4), 269–273 (2002)
25. Merton, R.K.: Science and technology in a democratic order. J. Legal Polit. Sociol. 1, 115–126 (1942)
26. Mok, K.H.: The quest for innovation and entrepreneurship: the changing role of university in East Asia. Glob. Soc. Educ. 10(3), 317–335 (2012)
27. Park, H.W., Hong, H.D., Leydesdorff, L.: A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and The Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics 65(1), 3–27 (2005)
28. Park, H.W., Leydesdorff, L.: Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry–government relations in South Korea: the role of programmatic incentives. Res. Policy 39(5), 640–649 (2010)
29. Phillips, F.: Triple helix and the circle of innovation. J. Contemp. Eastern Asia 13(1), 57–68 (2014). http://eastasia.yu.ac.kr/Phillips_13_1.pdf
30. Ponds, R., Van Oort, F.G., Frenken, K.: The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Pap. Reg. Sci. 86, 423–443 (2007)
31. Rho, W.-J.: Triple helix for social innovation: the Saemaul undong for eradicating poverty. J. Contemp. Eastern Asia 13(1), 39–55 (2014). http://eastasia.yu.ac.kr/Rho_13_1.pdf
32. Saad, M., Zawdie, G., Malairaja, C.: The triple helix strategy for universities in developing countries: the experiences in Malaysia and Algeria. Sci. Public Policy 35(6), 431–443 (2008)
33. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)
34. Senker, J.: A Ttransnational Investigation of University-Industry Linkages in Advanced Engineering Ceramic. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK (1994)
35. Schiller, H.: Not yet the post-imperialist era. Crit. Stud. Mass Commun. 8(1), 13–28 (1991)
36. Steiber, A., Alänge, S.: The formation and growth of Google: a firm-level triple helix perspective. Soc. Sci. Inf. 52(4), 575–604 (2013)
37. Wallerstein, I.: The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: concepts for comparative analysis. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 16(4), 387–415 (1974)
38. Ye, F.Y., Yu, S.S., Leydesdorff, L.: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64(11), 2317–2325 (2013)
39. Ziman, J.: Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1994)