The triple helix strategy for universities in developing countries: The experiences in Malaysia and Algeria

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 431-443

  Saad, Mohammed ^a   Zawdie, Girma ^b   Malairaja, Chandra ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c Kemeneterian Sains Teknologi dan Inovasi   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; EDUCATION POLICY; INNOVATION; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; STATE ROLE; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

AFRICA; ALGERIA; ASIA; EURASIA; MALAYSIA; NORTH AFRICA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

EID: 49749131502     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234208X323316     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abramovitz, M 1986 Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), June, 385-406.
2. Ali, A 2003 Engaging economic development through the commercialisation of research: the Malaysian experience. Paper presented at the General Conference of the Association of Commonwealth Universities, 31 August-4 September, Belfast.
3. Almeida, M, J Mello and H Etzkowitz 2007 Innovation in incubation and inclusion: the diffusion of the Brazilian cooperative incubator. Paper presented at the Triple Helix VI Conference, 16-18 May, Singapore.
4. Blaikie, N 2000 Designing Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Bourdieu, P 1985 The social space and genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14(6), 723-744.
6. Burt, R 2005 Brokerage and Closure: an Introduction to Social Capital. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Burt, R S 2004 Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
8. Cavusgil, S T, R J Catelone and Y Zhao 2003. Tacit knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 18(l), 6-21.
9. Clark, N and C Juma 1987 Long-Run Economics: an Evolutionary Approach to Economic Growth. London/New York: Pinter.
10. Cohen, W M and D A Levinthal 1990 Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 28-152.
11. Coleman, J S 1990 Foundation of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Doloreux, D and S Parto 2004 Regional innovation systems: a critical synthesis. INTECH (Institute for New Technologies) Discussion Paper Series. Maastricht, The Netherlands: United Nations University.
13. Dosi, G 1982 Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, Research Policy, 11(3),147-162.
14. Etzkowitz, H 2002 Networks of innovation: science, technology and development in the triple helix era. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 7-20.
15. Etzkowitz, H 2003 Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109-121.
16. Etzkowitz, H 2006 The new visible hand: an assisted linear model of science and innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 33(5), 310-320.
17. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff, eds. 1997 The University in the Global Knowledge Economy. London: Continuum.
18. Etzkowitz, H and J M C de Mello 2004 The rise of a triple helix culture: innovation in Brazilian economic and social development. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 2(3), 159-171.
19. Etzkowitz, H and L Leydesdorff 2000 The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
20. Fine, B 2001 Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science. London: Routledge.
21. Freeman, C and C Perez 1988 Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, eds. G Dosi, C Freeman, R Nelson, G Silverberg and L Soete. London: Frances Pinter.
22. GoM, Government of Malaysia 2001 Eighth Malaysian Plan, 2001-2005, Kuala Lumpur: Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister's Department.
23. Granovetter, M 1973 The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
24. Jones, C, W S Hesterly and SP Borgatti 1997 A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945.
25. Juma, C 2006 Redesigning African Economies: the Role of Engineering in International Development. London: Royal Academy of Engineering.
26. Kraak, A 2001 Debating Castells and Camoy on the network society. In Challenges of Globalisation: South African Debates with Manuel Castells, eds. J Muller, N Cloete and S Badat. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.
27. Kruss, G 2005 Harnessing innovation potential? Institutional approaches to industry-higher education research partnerships in South Africa. Industry and Higher Education, 19(2), 131-142.
28. Kruss, G (forthcoming 2008) Balancing old and new organisational forms: changing dynamics of government, industry and university interaction in South Africa, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management.
29. Leydesdorff, L 2001 Knowledge-based innovation systems and the model of a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Paper presented at the New Economic Windows: New Paradigms for the New Millennium conference, September, Salerno, Italy.
30. Leydesdorff, L and H Etzkowitz 1998 The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203.
31. Leydesdorff, L and H Etzkowitz 2001 The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology 5(4), , last accessed 7 July 2008.
32. Lin, N 2001 Social Capital: a Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lundvall, B-A 2002 The university in the learning economy. DRUID Working Paper No.02-06. University of Aaalborg: Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics.
34. Makadok, R 2001 Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387-401.
35. MIGHT, Malaysian Industry-Government Group for High Technology Report 2002 Prospecting Industry Deepening. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
36. Moran, P and S Ghoshal 1996 Theories of economic organisation: the case for realism and balance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 58-72.
37. Morgan, K 1997 The learning region; institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491-503.
38. Morgan, R M and S D Hunt 1994 The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, July, 20-38.
39. Nahapiet, J and S Ghoshal 1998 Social capital, intellectual capital and the organisational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
40. Nonaka, I and M Takeuchi 1995 The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press
41. Portes A 1998 Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
42. Pouris, A and A Pouris 2007 The state of science and technology in Africa (2000-2004). In Proceedings of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISI), eds. D Torres-Salinas and H Moed. Madrid: Spain.
43. Prahalad, C K and G Hamel 1990 The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 71-91.
44. Putnam, R D 2000 Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
45. Rothwell, R 1992 Successful industrial innovation: critical success factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22(30), 221-239.
46. Saad, M 2004 Issues and challenges arising from the application of innovation strategies based on the triple helix culture - experience of the incubation system in Algeria. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 19-36.
47. Saad, M and G Zawdie 2005 From technology transfer to the emergence of a triple helix culture: the experience of Algeria in innovation and technological capability development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(1), 1-15.
48. Sadullah, A F 2002 Commercialisation of research results: issues and challenges. USM Engineering and Campus Perspective, USM Frontiers, 1(2), July.
49. Sawyer, A 2004 Challenges Facing African Universities. Accra, Ghana: Association of African Universities.
50. Shinn, T 2002 The triple helix and new production of knowledge: prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Science, 32(4), 599-614.
51. Spender, J C 1996 Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, special issue: Knowledge and the Firm, 45-62.
52. Sutz, J 2000 The university-industry-government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29(2), 279-290.
53. Tidd, J, J Bessant and K Pavitt 2001 Managing Innovation, 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley.
54. Van Dijk, M P and H Sandee eds. 2002 Innovation and Small Enterprises in the Third World: New Horizons in the Economics of Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
55. UNDP, United Nations Development Programme 2001 Human Development Report 2001. Making New Technologies Work for Human Development. New York: UNDP.
56. Wernerfelt, B 1995 The Resource-based view of the firm: ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171-174.
57. Williamson, O E 1979 The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233-261.
58. World Bank 2002 Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
59. Zawdie, G 1996 Tertiary education and technological progress in transitional economies: whither demand pull? Science, Technology and Development, 13(3), 89-104.
60. Zawdie, G and A Djeflat 1996 Tertiary education and technological progress in transitional economies: whither demand pull? Science, Technology and Development, 13(3), 89-104.